Difference between revisions of "Talk:Morgan Tucker"
(Created page with "Zhen Lian's Review Hey Morgan, I enjoyed reading about your views on your personal data identity. Your introduction clearly stated your argument and it made it easy to underst...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Zhen Lian's Review | + | === Zhen Lian's Review === |
Hey Morgan, | Hey Morgan, | ||
I enjoyed reading about your views on your personal data identity. Your introduction clearly stated your argument and it made it easy to understand the rest of your writing. The contents in your writing had a very good logical flow and good transitions from one point to the next. It was clear that your analysis reflected your data identity statement. In addition, the placements of your ideas were perfectly separated, and it made the writing much easier to follow. One suggestion I have is to talk more about the information you got from Checkmate. Was the information outdated? Was there anything that surprised you or that you expected as a result, but didn’t show? Overall, I think you did great exploring your data identity with detailed analysis of the results of your searches. | I enjoyed reading about your views on your personal data identity. Your introduction clearly stated your argument and it made it easy to understand the rest of your writing. The contents in your writing had a very good logical flow and good transitions from one point to the next. It was clear that your analysis reflected your data identity statement. In addition, the placements of your ideas were perfectly separated, and it made the writing much easier to follow. One suggestion I have is to talk more about the information you got from Checkmate. Was the information outdated? Was there anything that surprised you or that you expected as a result, but didn’t show? Overall, I think you did great exploring your data identity with detailed analysis of the results of your searches. | ||
Revision as of 00:27, 24 February 2021
Zhen Lian's Review
Hey Morgan, I enjoyed reading about your views on your personal data identity. Your introduction clearly stated your argument and it made it easy to understand the rest of your writing. The contents in your writing had a very good logical flow and good transitions from one point to the next. It was clear that your analysis reflected your data identity statement. In addition, the placements of your ideas were perfectly separated, and it made the writing much easier to follow. One suggestion I have is to talk more about the information you got from Checkmate. Was the information outdated? Was there anything that surprised you or that you expected as a result, but didn’t show? Overall, I think you did great exploring your data identity with detailed analysis of the results of your searches.
