Difference between revisions of "Public Morality"

From SI410
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
== Public Morality and Religion ==
 
== Public Morality and Religion ==
A common reason for Public morality is religion. Philosophers such as John Rawls and Jürgen Habermas have tried to argue that public morality should remain neutral and not deal with religion and other controversial issues, but the two concepts are inseparable as civil law is derived from natural law.<ref>Blasi, Fulvio Di. "Public Morality." New Catholic Encyclopedia Supplement 2012-2013: Ethics and Philosophy, edited by Robert L. Fastiggi, vol. 3, Gale, 2013, pp. 1280-1282. Gale Virtual Reference Library, link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/CX2762500603/GVRL?u=umuser&sid=GVRL&xid=b99c4392.</ref> George Washington, the first president of the United States, wrote in his Farewell Address:
+
A common reason for Public morality is religion. Philosophers such as John Rawls and Jürgen Habermas have tried to argue that public morality should remain neutral and not deal with religion and other controversial issues, but the two concepts are inseparable as civil law is derived from natural law.<ref>Blasi, Fulvio Di. "Public Morality." New Catholic Encyclopedia Supplement 2012-2013: Ethics and Philosophy, edited by Robert L. Fastiggi, vol. 3, Gale, 2013, pp. 1280-1282. Gale Virtual Reference Library, link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/CX2762500603/GVRL?u=umuser&sid=GVRL&xid=b99c4392.</ref>
  
''“Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports… And let us with caution indulge the supposition that morality can be maintained without religion. Whatever may be conceded to the influence of refined education on minds of peculiar structure, reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle.”''<ref>"Avalon Project - Washington's Farewell Address 1796". Avalon.Law.Yale.Edu, 2019, avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/washing.asp.</ref><ref name="name">Galston, William A. “Public Morality and Religion in the Liberal State.” PS, vol. 19, no. 4, 1986, pp. 807–824. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/419315.</ref>
+
Washington said that morality and religion complement each other<ref>"Avalon Project - Washington's Farewell Address 1796". Avalon.Law.Yale.Edu, 2019, avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/washing.asp.</ref><ref name="name">Galston, William A. “Public Morality and Religion in the Liberal State.” PS, vol. 19, no. 4, 1986, pp. 807–824. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/419315.</ref>
 
+
. He intended for America to be a "Christian nation", and believed that religion provides reasons for convincing citizens that liberal principles are correct. <ref name="name" /> Certain Islamic countries such as Iran, Saudi Arabia and Malaysia have religious police<ref>“Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.” The Koran for Dummies, by Sohaib Sultan, Hungry Minds, 2004, pp. 238–246.</ref> who enforce religious standards in public. Common examples of religious standards include not abiding by Islamic dress codes, consumption of alcohol and pork, and homosexual behavior. If any of these acts are seen by said police the citizens may be arrested.
 
+
Washington said that morality and religion complement each other. He intended for America to be a "Christian nation", and believed that religion provides reasons for convincing citizens that liberal principles are correct. <ref name="name" /> Certain Islamic countries such as Iran, Saudi Arabia and Malaysia have religious police<ref>“Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.” The Koran for Dummies, by Sohaib Sultan, Hungry Minds, 2004, pp. 238–246.</ref> who enforce religious standards in public. Common examples of religious standards include not abiding by Islamic dress codes, consumption of alcohol and pork, and homosexual behavior. If any of these acts are seen by said police the citizens may be arrested.
+
  
 
== Public Morality Evolving ==     
 
== Public Morality Evolving ==     

Revision as of 19:21, 15 April 2019

Public morality is the observance and subscription to moral principles and ethical standards which a society enforces by statutory law, police work or social pressure in everyday public life. Activities that are regulated range from behavior of individual citizens in public spaces to the content that citizens post on social media. Typically, regulation includes prohibiting or restricting prostitution, pornography, and other forms of sexual vice, as well as gambling, cruelty to animals, and the use of alcohol and drugs. [1] These behaviors and actions are usually deemed immoral, sinful or degrading, contaminating the social well being of society. Public morality limits the behavior of individuals in public places to what is socially acceptable, and is often used to justify censorship. In theocracies, public morality may be equated with religious instruction, where both are given the equal force of law.

Public Morality and Religion

A common reason for Public morality is religion. Philosophers such as John Rawls and Jürgen Habermas have tried to argue that public morality should remain neutral and not deal with religion and other controversial issues, but the two concepts are inseparable as civil law is derived from natural law.[2]

Washington said that morality and religion complement each other[3][4] . He intended for America to be a "Christian nation", and believed that religion provides reasons for convincing citizens that liberal principles are correct. [4] Certain Islamic countries such as Iran, Saudi Arabia and Malaysia have religious police[5] who enforce religious standards in public. Common examples of religious standards include not abiding by Islamic dress codes, consumption of alcohol and pork, and homosexual behavior. If any of these acts are seen by said police the citizens may be arrested.

Public Morality Evolving

Views on public morality are not definite, as they are constantly changing. [6] In most countries, Homosexuality used to be a criminal offense. There are still 10 Islamic countries ruled by Sharia law, meaning that the death penalty is given to those that display homosexual acts. Only at the beginning of the 21st century is when countries started legalizing same-sex marriages. Society has also began to accept Pornography. Prior to the Golden Age of Porn,[7] participation in the creation, distribution and consumption of pornography was illegal in most of the United States. Today the porn industry in the U.S. is worth between $10-$12 billion.

Public morality standards vary across cultures and countries. For example, the public consumption of alcohol in public is banned in much of the United States, while in countries such as Portugal, Spain, Germany, the United Kingdom, New Zealand, Japan and China, it is legal. Similarly, the recreational use of marijuana has been legalized in Canada and certain states in America, while it still remains illegal in the many other parts of the world.

Public Morality in the Digital Age

Kenny's brother abusing Dusty the cat

Public morality also applies to the cyberspace. There have been many cases where the online community has charged perpetrators of immoral acts. In 2009, a fourteen year old named Kenny Glenn posted two videos of him and his brother abusing a cat named Dusty. The online community responded by tracking down the creator of the videos and passed his details to the local police department. This resulted in an arrest and the cat being taken to a safe place.

Reddit, the online community responsible for outing Kenny Glenn for his behavior, plays a major part in this online space for public morality. Reddit has thousands of subreddits dedicated to outing certain behavior that go against these norms. Reddit outed major names in online outbreaks like gamergate, and even deals with smaller issues within subreddits in the realm of cheating boyfriends and girlfriends. Reddit, and social media in a sense, is the online hub that people can use to call outrage to people and instances that go against public morality.

Given the prominence of social media in society, public morality offenses have become much easier to discover as individuals shift their personal and private lives into online public spheres. This has raised some ethical issues concerning privacy.

Ethical Concerns

Public Morality and Social Media

"Overheard at umich" Facebook Group, where anyone can see the posts

There used to be a separation between private and public morality, where private conduct does not affect an individual’s behavior in public roles and vice versa. [8] But, one's conduct outside of the home, be it a student, celebrity or manager of a corporation, is evaluated through the lens of public morality. With the convergence of private and public lives due to social media, one's actions in private will be judged using public morality standards, which leads to punishments in virtual environments. What individuals say to their friends in private might get published on social media by someone who overheard the conversation.[9]

An example of this is the "Overheard at umich" Facebook group[10] where students at the University of Michigan post conversations that they overheard around campus. Some of the more controversial conversations are criticized by group members and can be traced back to the student who said those words. Any student can get into trouble if they are not careful with their words and actions due to the blurring of private and public morality caused by social media.

A more culturally specific example of public morality and social media can be seen in the rise in popularity of the Asian-centric Facebook groups “Subtle Asian Traits” and “Subtle Asian Dating”. [11] The majority of the members of these groups are Asian. However, although the majority of the members are Asian, they come from all over the world. The bulk of the members are Asians based in the United States, Australia and the United Kingdom, but there are also a large number of members from Singapore and other parts of Asia. Due to these geographical differences, different members often have varying reactions to the content posted in these groups. Some members, particularly those that are based in Asia, can be more conservative than their United States or Australia-based peers. This shows that cultural differences can influence public morality even in groups where members predominantly have the same ethnicity.


References

  1. George, Robert P. "public morality." The Oxford Companion to Philosophy. : Oxford University Press, January 01, 2005. Oxford Reference, oxfordreference.com.proxy.lib.umich.edu/view/10.1093/acref/9780199264797.001.0001/acref-9780199264797-e-2086>.
  2. Blasi, Fulvio Di. "Public Morality." New Catholic Encyclopedia Supplement 2012-2013: Ethics and Philosophy, edited by Robert L. Fastiggi, vol. 3, Gale, 2013, pp. 1280-1282. Gale Virtual Reference Library, link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/CX2762500603/GVRL?u=umuser&sid=GVRL&xid=b99c4392.
  3. "Avalon Project - Washington's Farewell Address 1796". Avalon.Law.Yale.Edu, 2019, avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/washing.asp.
  4. 4.0 4.1 Galston, William A. “Public Morality and Religion in the Liberal State.” PS, vol. 19, no. 4, 1986, pp. 807–824. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/419315.
  5. “Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.” The Koran for Dummies, by Sohaib Sultan, Hungry Minds, 2004, pp. 238–246.
  6. Anglim, Christopher, et al. Privacy Rights in the Digital Age, Grey House Publishing, 2016. ProQuest Ebook Central, ebookcentral-proquest-com.proxy.lib.umich.edu/lib/umichigan/detail.action?docID=4454671.
  7. Paasonen, Susanna; Saarenmaa, Laura (July 19, 2007). The Golden Age of Porn: Nostalgia and History in Cinema (PDF). WordPress. Retrieved April 30, 2017.
  8. Smith, Jeffery. "Morality, Public and Private." The SAGE Encyclopedia of Business Ethics and Society. Ed. Robert W. Kolb. Thousand Oaks,: SAGE Publications, Inc., 2018. 2383-2384. SAGE Knowledge. Web. 15 Mar. 2019, doi: 10.4135/9781483381503.n807.
  9. Daulerio, A. J. (October 1, 2010). "A Glimpse Into How The Duke Fuck List Went Viral". Deadspin. Archived from the original on 4 October 2010. Retrieved 11 October 2010.
  10. “Overheard at Umich.” Overheard at Umich Public Group, www.facebook.com/groups/1643645399032633/.
  11. Kwai, Isabella. “How 'Subtle Asian Traits' Became a Global Hit.” The New York Times, The New York Times, 11 Dec. 2018, www.nytimes.com/2018/12/11/world/australia/subtle-asian-traits-facebook-group.html.