Difference between revisions of "Talk:Chris Hong"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Chris, I really like the way you have approached this assignment. Your introduction describing yourself is a really good entrance point to your analysis. It explains where the idea to split your avatar into the three phases could come from. I think it is original to split a Facebook avatar into separate stages, based on how your real “me” was evolving. | Chris, I really like the way you have approached this assignment. Your introduction describing yourself is a really good entrance point to your analysis. It explains where the idea to split your avatar into the three phases could come from. I think it is original to split a Facebook avatar into separate stages, based on how your real “me” was evolving. | ||
| + | |||
The structure of the “paper” is very well organized. The idea to focus in each section only on three Facebook elements makes it very consistent and easy to follow. Furthermore, the reader can quickly understand the changes that were happening in your personal life. Also, I like your use of screenshots from your Facebook account and the quotes you have added. In addition, I like how you have used the MediaWiki formatting. However, in “The Third Phase” there is a little bit of text between two screenshots, which look a little bit awkward, but it is a little detail. | The structure of the “paper” is very well organized. The idea to focus in each section only on three Facebook elements makes it very consistent and easy to follow. Furthermore, the reader can quickly understand the changes that were happening in your personal life. Also, I like your use of screenshots from your Facebook account and the quotes you have added. In addition, I like how you have used the MediaWiki formatting. However, in “The Third Phase” there is a little bit of text between two screenshots, which look a little bit awkward, but it is a little detail. | ||
| + | |||
Overall, I think you did a great job on explaining how your avatar was changing with your real identity and using solid examples to support your points. I also agree with you that no matter how much information one will put on Facebook it will never fully represent who that person is in real life. I think that is actually a great thing because people still have motivation for offline interactions. | Overall, I think you did a great job on explaining how your avatar was changing with your real identity and using solid examples to support your points. I also agree with you that no matter how much information one will put on Facebook it will never fully represent who that person is in real life. I think that is actually a great thing because people still have motivation for offline interactions. | ||
| + | |||
-Jan Konarzewski | -Jan Konarzewski | ||
Revision as of 01:56, 19 November 2012
Chris, I really like the way you have approached this assignment. Your introduction describing yourself is a really good entrance point to your analysis. It explains where the idea to split your avatar into the three phases could come from. I think it is original to split a Facebook avatar into separate stages, based on how your real “me” was evolving.
The structure of the “paper” is very well organized. The idea to focus in each section only on three Facebook elements makes it very consistent and easy to follow. Furthermore, the reader can quickly understand the changes that were happening in your personal life. Also, I like your use of screenshots from your Facebook account and the quotes you have added. In addition, I like how you have used the MediaWiki formatting. However, in “The Third Phase” there is a little bit of text between two screenshots, which look a little bit awkward, but it is a little detail.
Overall, I think you did a great job on explaining how your avatar was changing with your real identity and using solid examples to support your points. I also agree with you that no matter how much information one will put on Facebook it will never fully represent who that person is in real life. I think that is actually a great thing because people still have motivation for offline interactions.
-Jan Konarzewski
