Talk:Strava

Peer Review

Length

The article (at a word count of around 1030 words) is adequately long according to the rubric for the assignment.

Structure

The article is well-structured with a clear and concise introductory paragraph, a well-defined body divided into two sections exploring the features of and ethical concerns with the app, and the presence of well-reputed sources to act as references for the content on the site.

The author could consider introducing citations for material in the introductory paragraph (as opposed to waiting for the body that expands on it to cite sources). For the body, the inclusion of well-sourced, relevant images depicting the app's features would greatly enhance the section on features. The author could also consider adding more content about the features of the platform if possible.

Clarity

The issue at stake is made very clear by the article. It sets up the content on the ethical issues well, and elaborates well!

Objective Reporting

The article does a good job of keeping the discourse around the ethical issues examined objective and neutral. The author could consider adding some content to detail Strava's responses to concerns about privacy (especially with respect to exposing sensitive information like the location of military bases).