Talk:Stan Twitter

All sections added together, excluding the summary section come to 988 words, which confers to the requirements of the draft assignment word count. The opening describes a little summary of the origin and what stan-twitter is. The author could gain more clarity on how stan-Twitter has affected the online population by stating the pros and cons of the existence of stan-Twitter. The body paragraphs are properly broken apart into different sections and contribute to the topic at hand. A minor detail about the section headers, it would be beneficial to add more details about the text under the section headers to add clarity(specifically the politics section). The author properly cites the sources as well as references them in the body paragraphs, no further improvements are needed. The issue wasn’t apparent at first by the opening. Similar to the previous comment on the opening, adding more information regarding how stan-Twitter is affecting the population and what were the effects of stan-Twitter. This can illustrate the current situation at hand and lead to a discussion of issues and potential solutions. As there are unfinished sections in the draft still, this fix could be done after writing all body paragraphs. However, the opening gives ideas about the issues of stan-Twitter and leads to ideas regarding the discussion of its ethics. The improvement could be implemented by letting the issues of stan-Twitter lead to ethical questionings, which is then elaborated on the impact of stan-Twitter and how positively or negatively it impacts the online population.

The author doesn’t support a side on the topic and discussed the topic objectively. This is made apparent through the politics section, where the author stated the events and analyzed what stan-Twitter culture has done to the crowd or online population.