Talk:Ron's Gone Wrong (film) (2021)
Length Based on what I am able to tell, the article is roughly 3030 words which fall directly within the 3000 words plus or minus 100. While I do wish that there was more length to the setting section I do appreciate the amount which was able to be said about the ethical issues addressed in the movie.
Structure The article does contain an opening paragraph and it does a good job of summarizing what the movie is about. The opening paragraph gives the reader information, such as release date and directors, as well as a brief synopsis of the film. If there were more words available I would elaborate a bit more on the summary of the movie to make the reader more interested in reading further about the details of the film. The body of the article is separated into appropriate sections which divide the contents. In terms of structure of the article I feel like either more length should be added to the Settings section or combine the settings section with the Plot section in order to make a smoother structure to the article. In terms of sources most of the sources are from well known publications like Time or The Atlantic, however with topics such as artificial intelligence or technology addiction like is discussed in the ethical issues section, I believe that there should be some very good available sources from published papers or academic journals. Because these are topics which are currently being discussed by academics I think that you should be able to find some really strong sources which will strengthen the discussion of ethical issues in the article.
Clarity The issues addressed about ethical issues related to the film in the article are, Human Relationships with Artificial Intelligence, The Impact of High-tech Intelligence on Human Beings, Double-edged Perspective of High-tech Intelligence. I think that the article does a good job of addressing what the ethical issues are and how they relate to both the film and to real life/ society.
Objective Reporting I think that in the discussion of ethical issues there are both really good examples of objective reporting and places where it feels like personal arguments are slipping in. In the areas where a large amount of references are used, such as in the last paragraph of “‘The Impact of High-Tech Intelligence on human beings”’, the ethical debates happening in the related topic are highlighted by including researched statistics and previously stated view points. In other parts such as in the discussion of “‘Human Relationships With Artificial Intelligence”’ the long spans of writing without reference to a source makes the viewpoints presented seem personal and originating from the author. I think that by expanding the list of references you will be able to find other authors who have written about or researched the ethical issues discussed so you will be able to provide the reader with more objective reports showing multiple perspectives previously made on the topic. Additionally, I think that by including more sources from academic publications, as stated earlier in the review, it will both make the reporting of the issues more objective, but also strengthen the report of the specific issues. In addition, I think that the final paragraph of the “‘Double-Edged Perspective of High-Tech Intelligence”’ seems more like a conclusion paragraph than a report of the issue. I would consider going back and changing the paragraph and including sources to have previous perspectives on the topic rather than a personal standpoint on the issues. Because it's a wiki post the last paragraph doesn’t have to bring a conclusion to the article and having the inclusion of more sources to conclude the report of the particular ethical issue would strengthen the article as a whole.
