Talk:Deepfake Ethics

The length of the article is just over 1000 words so that's all good. The introduction did a good job with providing background information on the topic but I think that a brief overview of the issue with deepfakes would be helpful, just like one or two sentences. The body of the article is split into different sections which is good but I think you should make some of them subsections with three equals signs like this: "===Heading===". I think the example sections that you have would be good for this. The sources that you have are fine but I think it would look better for your article if you used the source that was listed under and used by the deepfake Wikipedia article instead of just repeatedly citing the wiki page. I think you did a good job on getting across the ethical concerns that deepfakes propose. The only part that I can see where there might be some issue with keeping a neutral perspective would be in the Ethical Concerns section. At then end, it sounds a little like a call to action and that you are taking a stance on what should be done. Though I think that mainly has to do with the "We" part of the sentence, so maybe you should start that last sentence off with something like "They believe that we...". Other than that, I think it looks all good.