Talk:Cyberpunk Edgerunners (animated series)

Review

The length of the article is 2516 words, which meets the requirement of 1000 words. The article starts by briefly introducing the Cyberpunk 2077 animation series including its setting, characters, and plots. Then several ethic issues are discussed, including crime scenes, sexual contents and cyber security issues. The overall structure is clear. The article has not been completely formatted as a wikipedia page but is divided into sections. I am not sure whether it is the formatting issue but most contents are not backed by references though a reference section is provided. Also, it is better no to use a reddit thread as a reference since it is unlikely to be a reliable source. After reading through the page, I have had a clear idea on the ethicality of the animation series. The crime and sexual scenes would potentially negatively impact the viewers, especially children and teenagers. Also, the animation series gives the viewer a sense that everyone's mind is "hackable". Moreover, the idea of virtually connected human bodies in some degree motivates a stratified society since not everyone is benefitted from such advanced connectivity. I think it will be better to separate the "cybersecurity" section into two parts: the cybersecurity issue itself and the social effects it brings. The issues are objectively reported and the stakeholders are clear in the discussion of issues. It would be better if the author includes more discussion on the perspective of children (maybe their parents) which makes the content more concrete. Looking for articles on children's and their parents' opinions on the animation series may be useful as reliable sources. In conclusion, the article is well structured and clear in discussion of the ethicality of the animation series. To improve, reference numbers should be clearly provided in the text and some choices of references should be reconsidered.