Talk:ChatGPT Changing Education

The draft is about 1200 words, thus I would say it looks good in terms of length. Structure wise, the article included the three major components of a good article. In the background section, you provided an overview of ChatGPT. You introduced ChatGPT, what it does, its key features and the implications of such AI technology. Diving into ChatGPT in education, you discussed the benefits as well as the concerns over this newly developed model. In the body sections, you divided the discussion into two sides of the arguments: capabilities and upsides and negative implications. While you mentioned the strength of this algorithm as well as how it is being used, you also talked about the ethical concerns regarding it. In addition, you incorporated credible sources from the New York Times, the Guardian, etc. For clarity, I think you narrated the issue at stake well. I was able to understand what the negative impacts were and their significance. Specifically, how ChatGPT can be used for malicious purposes, such as spreading disinformation or generating fake news, as well as its potential threat to data privacy. If anything, I think you could further break down your sections into smaller pieces so that each point made under the sections could be clear at a glance and discussed more in depth. Throughout the article, you did a good job maintaining a neutral point of view when reporting. You didn’t state your personal opinions and backed up your statements with reliable sources.