Difference between revisions of "Talk:Women in Gaming"

From SI410
Jump to: navigation, search
(Game Content)
(Notes in Discussion tab added. This is close to a Blue Star, but needs some clean up and organization.)
 
(13 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
In the Game Content section, can we have a citation for the claim "Although these games were, and still are, successful with male gamers, the violent and aggressive nature proved to be less appealing to women."? Seems to be based off the stereotype that men like violence and women don't.  
 
In the Game Content section, can we have a citation for the claim "Although these games were, and still are, successful with male gamers, the violent and aggressive nature proved to be less appealing to women."? Seems to be based off the stereotype that men like violence and women don't.  
 
 
- Drake
 
- Drake
 +
 +
a big thing going on right now is the kickstarter led by Anita Sarkeesian and the news involved with that- worth looking into [[User:Brownman|Brownman]] ([[User talk:Brownman|talk]]) 16:19, 5 December 2012 (EST)
 +
 +
I fixed up a few of the examples that were incorrect and cleaned up some of the phrasing/grammar. The page needs better organization on a whole, since sub categories are sometimes not related to its parent category. Some of the pictures are broken, as well. -Michael
 +
 +
Does anyone know if under "Other examples of female video game characters" the first subcategory means eroticized characters? (I don't know enough about mortal kombat) The subheading seems to imply so, but then the lead in paragraph before the bullets contradicts that... - Allison
 +
 +
*yup '''beyond good and evil''' is seen as portraying the female lead character in a positive manner.
 +
 +
i moved what was the original ethics section to the acceptance of women in gaming, and started a broader discussion of the ethical issues in portraying women in gaming. but it needs expanding.
 +
 +
i undid the last edit, i think it was a little extreme, the information needs some editing but you can't talk about women in games without looking at race/gender/sex/color all of which are essentially null use categories but are exploited in games to different effects thus...they have to be addressed
 +
 +
i throw up a little in my mouth when i see the pms... pic so i added some diversity to intro pics
 +
 +
I'm considering adding a section on breast physics mainly based on this source. It gives a multidimensional view on why they exist and why things can go wrong with it beyond the status quo of "OMG SEXISM!!"
 +
http://kotaku.com/how-video-game-breasts-are-made-and-why-they-can-go-so-1687753475
 +
~ Kevin Wang
 +
 +
==Winter 2017 Notes ==
 +
 +
Bess:
 +
 +
This article is reasonably close to a Blue Star. It'd be helpful if someone stepped back and looked at each of these sections and each subsection. IS there a logical flow to how this is organized? This is a little bit of a maze, though there is some strong content in here. We could restructure this to make it easier to navigate and read.

Latest revision as of 17:00, 23 April 2017

Game Content

In the Game Content section, can we have a citation for the claim "Although these games were, and still are, successful with male gamers, the violent and aggressive nature proved to be less appealing to women."? Seems to be based off the stereotype that men like violence and women don't. - Drake

a big thing going on right now is the kickstarter led by Anita Sarkeesian and the news involved with that- worth looking into Brownman (talk) 16:19, 5 December 2012 (EST)

I fixed up a few of the examples that were incorrect and cleaned up some of the phrasing/grammar. The page needs better organization on a whole, since sub categories are sometimes not related to its parent category. Some of the pictures are broken, as well. -Michael

Does anyone know if under "Other examples of female video game characters" the first subcategory means eroticized characters? (I don't know enough about mortal kombat) The subheading seems to imply so, but then the lead in paragraph before the bullets contradicts that... - Allison

  • yup beyond good and evil is seen as portraying the female lead character in a positive manner.

i moved what was the original ethics section to the acceptance of women in gaming, and started a broader discussion of the ethical issues in portraying women in gaming. but it needs expanding.

i undid the last edit, i think it was a little extreme, the information needs some editing but you can't talk about women in games without looking at race/gender/sex/color all of which are essentially null use categories but are exploited in games to different effects thus...they have to be addressed

i throw up a little in my mouth when i see the pms... pic so i added some diversity to intro pics

I'm considering adding a section on breast physics mainly based on this source. It gives a multidimensional view on why they exist and why things can go wrong with it beyond the status quo of "OMG SEXISM!!" http://kotaku.com/how-video-game-breasts-are-made-and-why-they-can-go-so-1687753475 ~ Kevin Wang

Winter 2017 Notes

Bess:

This article is reasonably close to a Blue Star. It'd be helpful if someone stepped back and looked at each of these sections and each subsection. IS there a logical flow to how this is organized? This is a little bit of a maze, though there is some strong content in here. We could restructure this to make it easier to navigate and read.