Difference between revisions of "Talk:WikiLeaks"
From SI410
(Created page with "== Neutrality? == Especially in the "Whistleblowing" section, the writer seems to have taken a position in supporting Wikileaks, or at least sternly disagreeing with President O...") |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Especially in the "Whistleblowing" section, the writer seems to have taken a position in supporting Wikileaks, or at least sternly disagreeing with President Obama. Should the tone be changed to represent a neutral stance on the topic? | Especially in the "Whistleblowing" section, the writer seems to have taken a position in supporting Wikileaks, or at least sternly disagreeing with President Obama. Should the tone be changed to represent a neutral stance on the topic? | ||
| + | |||
| + | I agree - I changed some wording and removed what looked to me like the most egregious sentence. Are there any other suggestions on improving the neutrality of the section? | ||
Latest revision as of 04:12, 8 December 2012
Neutrality?
Especially in the "Whistleblowing" section, the writer seems to have taken a position in supporting Wikileaks, or at least sternly disagreeing with President Obama. Should the tone be changed to represent a neutral stance on the topic?
I agree - I changed some wording and removed what looked to me like the most egregious sentence. Are there any other suggestions on improving the neutrality of the section?
