Difference between revisions of "Talk:Tumblr"

From SI410
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "Not really sure about the recent edits made to a few articles that accentuate the first letter of the intro paragraph... Doesn't seem typical of a wiki style. --~~~~")
 
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
==Winter 2018 Notes==
 +
Some of the sections need to be merged. For example, extensions aren't features of a website. They are add-ons and should be either their own section or removed from the features section. <br>
 +
--[[User:Chalse Okorom|chalseo]]
 +
 +
== Winter 2017 Notes ==
 +
* The lead here needs to reflect all the content below. We're missing a summary of the ethical debates described in the article.
 +
* The subsections here are a little irregular. Community doesn't have enough content to be its own subsection just yet. Can this be reorganized?
 +
* The citations need editing.
 +
 +
 +
== Previous Year Notes ==
 
Not really sure about the recent edits made to a few articles that accentuate the first letter of the intro paragraph... Doesn't seem typical of a wiki style. --[[User:Davefein|Davefein]] ([[User talk:Davefein|talk]]) 00:51, 11 December 2012 (EST)
 
Not really sure about the recent edits made to a few articles that accentuate the first letter of the intro paragraph... Doesn't seem typical of a wiki style. --[[User:Davefein|Davefein]] ([[User talk:Davefein|talk]]) 00:51, 11 December 2012 (EST)

Latest revision as of 07:53, 15 April 2018

Winter 2018 Notes

Some of the sections need to be merged. For example, extensions aren't features of a website. They are add-ons and should be either their own section or removed from the features section.
--chalseo

Winter 2017 Notes

  • The lead here needs to reflect all the content below. We're missing a summary of the ethical debates described in the article.
  • The subsections here are a little irregular. Community doesn't have enough content to be its own subsection just yet. Can this be reorganized?
  • The citations need editing.


Previous Year Notes

Not really sure about the recent edits made to a few articles that accentuate the first letter of the intro paragraph... Doesn't seem typical of a wiki style. --Davefein (talk) 00:51, 11 December 2012 (EST)