Difference between revisions of "Talk:Travis Spuller"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The opening of you being a ghost is very interesting and eye catching. I like how you give some explanations on the openness of your online data, because it certainly provides readers background information on this online identity search case. You give a detailed reason for why data brokers don’t have an extensive data about you and to what degree your online identity is in line with the offline you. The issues you bring up, temporality and relevance, are very reasonable, and the arguments you make are very sounding. You also mention the class readings. I just think it might be beneficial to use some sources outside class in your analysis of what you have found and give more details on the search process, for example, what search engines you used and what you tried after finding little information from data brokers.<br /> | The opening of you being a ghost is very interesting and eye catching. I like how you give some explanations on the openness of your online data, because it certainly provides readers background information on this online identity search case. You give a detailed reason for why data brokers don’t have an extensive data about you and to what degree your online identity is in line with the offline you. The issues you bring up, temporality and relevance, are very reasonable, and the arguments you make are very sounding. You also mention the class readings. I just think it might be beneficial to use some sources outside class in your analysis of what you have found and give more details on the search process, for example, what search engines you used and what you tried after finding little information from data brokers.<br /> | ||
Jiangqiong(Joan) Liu | Jiangqiong(Joan) Liu | ||
| + | |||
| + | Alexa Gillman's Comments: | ||
Revision as of 15:37, 20 February 2019
The opening of you being a ghost is very interesting and eye catching. I like how you give some explanations on the openness of your online data, because it certainly provides readers background information on this online identity search case. You give a detailed reason for why data brokers don’t have an extensive data about you and to what degree your online identity is in line with the offline you. The issues you bring up, temporality and relevance, are very reasonable, and the arguments you make are very sounding. You also mention the class readings. I just think it might be beneficial to use some sources outside class in your analysis of what you have found and give more details on the search process, for example, what search engines you used and what you tried after finding little information from data brokers.
Jiangqiong(Joan) Liu
Alexa Gillman's Comments:
