Difference between revisions of "Talk:The X-Files"
From SI410
(Created page with "This is a minimalist first cut article that shows promise with some content and editorial improvements. The lead is actually structured well to reflect the structure of the a...") |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | This is a minimalist first cut article that shows promise with some content and editorial improvements. The lead is actually structured well to reflect the structure of the article. The body fleshes out characters, but does noting with themes and plots. The ethical section seems to be the place where plots and storylines are introduced, but it would be more | + | This is a minimalist first cut article that shows promise with some content and editorial improvements. The lead is actually structured well to reflect the structure of the article. The body fleshes out characters, but does noting with themes and plots. The ethical section seems to be the place where plots and storylines are introduced, but it would be more effective to introduce themes and then focus on the ethical concerns raised by the show as a show. |
− | References need to be fully developed as full citations. | + | References need to be fully developed as full citations. Also, names should be presented in full, rather than just the last names. One should assume in a MediaWiki article that readers know nothing about the subject matter. |
Latest revision as of 20:50, 9 March 2016
This is a minimalist first cut article that shows promise with some content and editorial improvements. The lead is actually structured well to reflect the structure of the article. The body fleshes out characters, but does noting with themes and plots. The ethical section seems to be the place where plots and storylines are introduced, but it would be more effective to introduce themes and then focus on the ethical concerns raised by the show as a show.
References need to be fully developed as full citations. Also, names should be presented in full, rather than just the last names. One should assume in a MediaWiki article that readers know nothing about the subject matter.