Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sterling Sherman"
(Created page with "Peer Review 1: Hey Sterling, I think your article was a good representation, or flow of thoughts of the way you perceived facebook. This, along with the contrast you present...") |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Suggestions: | Suggestions: | ||
There are a few minor spelling errors, but really it did not take away from the material in your post. I feel as though your article covered a lot of the essential issues to be considered with Facebook, but I did not get enough of how this fit in with your avatar specifically. However, as I understand, you are not completely invested in publishing information on Facebook (I am the same way!) and this may be why there isn't enough of a representation of you. A suggestion could be to build on exactly that, and talk about why/how you do not want this on Facebook, or think what your activities on the network are sufficient. | There are a few minor spelling errors, but really it did not take away from the material in your post. I feel as though your article covered a lot of the essential issues to be considered with Facebook, but I did not get enough of how this fit in with your avatar specifically. However, as I understand, you are not completely invested in publishing information on Facebook (I am the same way!) and this may be why there isn't enough of a representation of you. A suggestion could be to build on exactly that, and talk about why/how you do not want this on Facebook, or think what your activities on the network are sufficient. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Overall, job well done! It was a great read. | ||
-Vishruta | -Vishruta | ||
Revision as of 02:28, 27 November 2012
Peer Review 1:
Hey Sterling,
I think your article was a good representation, or flow of thoughts of the way you perceived facebook. This, along with the contrast you presented with the uses of the site be companies, friends or other people in general proved very interesting, and brought some great privacy issues into the light. However, I think these issues could have been expanded on. I have provided some more detailed feedback below, hope it helps!
Positives: I really enjoyed reading your post. I got some glimpses into the kind of activities and socialization you conduct on Facebook, and how you see it to be used. I liked how you covered the generic uses of facebook, such as in job hunts etc. and catered this to describe what information was displayed on your profile. This brings to the reader's mind how conscientious you have to be with such a public site. The illustrations really provided a peek into your profile, and tied in with the text you had written. The placements make the article flow really well as there were pictures of what you were talking about, and made the analysis more personal overall.
Suggestions: There are a few minor spelling errors, but really it did not take away from the material in your post. I feel as though your article covered a lot of the essential issues to be considered with Facebook, but I did not get enough of how this fit in with your avatar specifically. However, as I understand, you are not completely invested in publishing information on Facebook (I am the same way!) and this may be why there isn't enough of a representation of you. A suggestion could be to build on exactly that, and talk about why/how you do not want this on Facebook, or think what your activities on the network are sufficient.
Overall, job well done! It was a great read.
-Vishruta
