Talk:Roland Park

Tianshuo Yan's Comments

Hi Roland,

I really enjoyed reading your online data identity statement. The introduction part is kind of unique, having a father who is familiar with ICT, you have a different sight other than the average people since very young, which perfectly gives an explaination for your behaviors in the digital world. I like how you set up your analysis by first talking about your expectations, then walking the reader through the process you took of many different search queries. In fact, my situation is somewhat similar to yours. I did not find a lot useful information when using my real world identity to search. However, your "or not" part makes your story catch my view. Using the digital identity (or the social media account) returns a lot useful information about a person. I think that was effective in highlighting your thesis and gave you a great landing point for analysis on its implications. You did a great job analyzing the privacy policy of Reddit and connect it with the reading Social Dilemma. One suggestion is that you could write more about how this social account reflects your personal information and further describe how easy it is to find the connection between your social account with your real world identity. Maybe this way could better reflect your point. Overall, it is a great job analyzing the online information about your data identity!

Alyssa Roach's Comments

Hey Roland!

I really liked your data integrity article! I enjoyed how you started it by discussing your relationship with the internet, it immediately allowed me to get a sense of what your morals were when it comes to what data is available about you online. I appreciated how you walked through your searches and then discussed in the "a relatively private footprint" and the "or not" section. However in my opinion these sections could be combined into one. I think for me as a reader it would help the flow in the statement. I think the section on Reddits privacy policies was really successful and though it was a great way to bring in some outside topic into your analysis. I think your conclusion was great in tying everything you found together online and how you felt about your level of digital authenticity. I would appreciate a bit more emphasis on professional vs. personal information. It sounds like you can really only find things about Roland related to your professional past and goals. Which is how I feel like many of us stand with our LinkedIn profile being public. I just would like a bit more opinion on how you feel about only that side of yourself being available. Overall I really enjoyed reading your article and thought you did a great job in your analysis. Best of luck on your revisions!