Difference between revisions of "Talk:Leaking Confidential Information Through WikiLeaks To Promote Transparency"

Revision as of 01:55, 3 February 2023

The length of the article is acceptable per the 1000-word limit with 100 words of variance. The article appears to be over that 1000-word limit so 

it is in good shape in terms of word count. The article provides subsections that describe the topic accurately, have multiple body sections, and have

a cited reference section containing in-text citations. The introduction seems to provide a good introduction to what WikiLeaks is and the body paragraphs 

expands on more specific details about WikiLeaks. The ethical issues are a little unclear to me as to which sections of the body are ethical issues and

which parts are just more information about WikiLeaks. I believe it would be a good choice to label a section "Ethical Issues" and provide the details under

this section so it's easier to distinguish between information and actual ethical issues. There are citations all throughout the article and the citations 

are properly formatted at the end with a wide variety of references which is beneficial. I believe that the article reports objectively for the most part

but there are some minor areas where it does not seem to be objective. There appears to be some sort of opinion in the body sections but overall great draft

of the article.