Difference between revisions of "Talk:Kuan-Yu Hsiao"
(Created page with "Peer Review 1: I think you did a good job talking about aspects of your profile and how you relate to them. However, you were very focused on only a few aspects (profile pict...") |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
I also agree with your ethics section when you talk about how it's not "unethical" for people to not be themselves online, but I think it might be good to go into more detail about this: Is it ever unethical to not be yourself? How is the situation different if you are omitting information versus if you are lying about information? | I also agree with your ethics section when you talk about how it's not "unethical" for people to not be themselves online, but I think it might be good to go into more detail about this: Is it ever unethical to not be yourself? How is the situation different if you are omitting information versus if you are lying about information? | ||
| − | Overall, I think your autobiography is structured very well, there is a nice flow between the different elements you talk about, and you all tie them back to yourself well. The only real grammatical comment I have is that there are random colons throughout your Consequences section, so that's something you might want to fix. Other than that, I think you did a good job with the piece. | + | Overall, I think your autobiography is structured very well, there is a nice flow between the different elements you talk about, and you all tie them back to yourself well. The only real grammatical comment I have is that there are random colons throughout your Consequences section, so that's something you might want to fix. Other than that, I think you did a good job with the piece. -Kristen |
Revision as of 20:39, 12 November 2012
Peer Review 1:
I think you did a good job talking about aspects of your profile and how you relate to them. However, you were very focused on only a few aspects (profile picture, cover photo, about me) - I think it would be interesting if you explored more aspects of your profile, especially secondary aspects, since those aren't mentioned at all. I also like that you talked about transparency, and people's expectation that if they are posting certain types of information, that everyone else should be as well. Also, it might be interesting to talk about how your profile represents you as a whole - you talk about each aspect in terms of it's relation to a part of you, but I would be nice to see how all of these pieces interact with each other (maybe try thinking of the "who I am" activity from section, and talking about some of those key terms in regards to your profile).
I also agree with your ethics section when you talk about how it's not "unethical" for people to not be themselves online, but I think it might be good to go into more detail about this: Is it ever unethical to not be yourself? How is the situation different if you are omitting information versus if you are lying about information?
Overall, I think your autobiography is structured very well, there is a nice flow between the different elements you talk about, and you all tie them back to yourself well. The only real grammatical comment I have is that there are random colons throughout your Consequences section, so that's something you might want to fix. Other than that, I think you did a good job with the piece. -Kristen
