Difference between revisions of "Talk:Instagram Censorship"
(→Clarity & Objective reporting) |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
References are listed at the very bottom of the page. The article includes both the articles it refers and the source of pictures it adds. One thing to point out is that the format of the citation is not quite in APA. That being said, the reference section has every information it needs to generate every citation in APA style. This can be handled when composing the final version of this article without any issue. | References are listed at the very bottom of the page. The article includes both the articles it refers and the source of pictures it adds. One thing to point out is that the format of the citation is not quite in APA. That being said, the reference section has every information it needs to generate every citation in APA style. This can be handled when composing the final version of this article without any issue. | ||
| − | ===Clarity | + | ===Clarity=== |
| − | The clarity of the article is impressive. It clearly shows why censorship involves ethical issues and how those issues are being solved or not. The article is described with an objective point of view. In that way, both sides of the controversy have been evaluated evenly. | + | The clarity of the article is impressive. It clearly shows why censorship involves ethical issues and how those issues are being solved or not. |
| + | |||
| + | ===Objective reporting=== | ||
| + | The article is described with an objective point of view. In that way, both sides of the controversy have been evaluated evenly. | ||
edited by Daniel Wang | edited by Daniel Wang | ||
Latest revision as of 18:50, 2 February 2023
Length
The length of this mediaWiki is good. It goes beyond the minimum requirement of 1000 words.
Structure
The article has all three components of a good article.
The article starts with a beginning paragraph introducing the protagonist, "Instagram". At the end of this open paragraph, it points out the main concerns of this article regarding "Instagram" - censorship decision. To be more specific, the algorithm behind "Instagram"'s censorship decisions involves "racist decisions and double targeting women and other marginalized communities"
The body of the article consists of a couple of components that further discuss the background, policies, ethical issues, and the outcome around the censorship decisions. Each part is filled with details.
References are listed at the very bottom of the page. The article includes both the articles it refers and the source of pictures it adds. One thing to point out is that the format of the citation is not quite in APA. That being said, the reference section has every information it needs to generate every citation in APA style. This can be handled when composing the final version of this article without any issue.
Clarity
The clarity of the article is impressive. It clearly shows why censorship involves ethical issues and how those issues are being solved or not.
Objective reporting
The article is described with an objective point of view. In that way, both sides of the controversy have been evaluated evenly.
edited by Daniel Wang
