Difference between revisions of "Talk:Instagram"
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
^I just edited the professional photographers section for grammer and tried to make it concise --[[User:smrithid|smrithid]] ([[User talk:smrithid|talk]]) 7:41, 11 December 2012 (EST) | ^I just edited the professional photographers section for grammer and tried to make it concise --[[User:smrithid|smrithid]] ([[User talk:smrithid|talk]]) 7:41, 11 December 2012 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | --------- | ||
| + | Would anyone else think it'd be a good idea to scrap some of the stuff that isn't as relevant in 2016? For example, I've never heard of InstaPad (especially since Instagram has an iPad app now) or Followgram. I would also argue that the "wealthy kids" section isn't relevant anymore. What do other people think? -- [[User:magarver|Madison Garver]] | ||
Revision as of 02:36, 22 April 2016
Just added a some information under ethics > professional photographers. Since English is not my first language, it would be good that someone checks that portion for any grammatical mistakes that I could have made. Thanks!! If you want to help me improve this article contact me: osgerman
^I just edited the professional photographers section for grammer and tried to make it concise --smrithid (talk) 7:41, 11 December 2012 (EST)
Would anyone else think it'd be a good idea to scrap some of the stuff that isn't as relevant in 2016? For example, I've never heard of InstaPad (especially since Instagram has an iPad app now) or Followgram. I would also argue that the "wealthy kids" section isn't relevant anymore. What do other people think? -- Madison Garver
