Difference between revisions of "Talk:Facebook"
From SI410
(Created page with "The inclusion of "The Social Network" in the "History" section is rather unnecessary. More specifically, I don't really see why the synopsis, names of actors, and commercial succ...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The inclusion of "The Social Network" in the "History" section is rather unnecessary. More specifically, I don't really see why the synopsis, names of actors, and commercial success of the film are relevant to the history of the site; if anything should be mentioned about the film, it should go in a separate section such as "Influence" or something of that sort. | The inclusion of "The Social Network" in the "History" section is rather unnecessary. More specifically, I don't really see why the synopsis, names of actors, and commercial success of the film are relevant to the history of the site; if anything should be mentioned about the film, it should go in a separate section such as "Influence" or something of that sort. | ||
| + | |||
| + | I agree, perhaps it should be put in a section about popular culture, or media influence, but the movie by itself has nothing to do with the history of Facebook. | ||
Revision as of 20:36, 18 December 2011
The inclusion of "The Social Network" in the "History" section is rather unnecessary. More specifically, I don't really see why the synopsis, names of actors, and commercial success of the film are relevant to the history of the site; if anything should be mentioned about the film, it should go in a separate section such as "Influence" or something of that sort.
I agree, perhaps it should be put in a section about popular culture, or media influence, but the movie by itself has nothing to do with the history of Facebook.
