Difference between revisions of "Talk:Depop"
From SI410
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=sources= | =sources= | ||
This [https://serc.berkeley.edu/why-thrifting-is-good-for-the-planet-not-just-your-wallet/ source] is not the best because they do not cite any of their statistics and was written by a student reporter | This [https://serc.berkeley.edu/why-thrifting-is-good-for-the-planet-not-just-your-wallet/ source] is not the best because they do not cite any of their statistics and was written by a student reporter | ||
| − | This [https://pebblemag.com/magazine/living/whats-wrong-with-fast-fashion source] also is not the best, they link externally, the original source should be cited. Some of their writing is conjecture. | + | This [https://pebblemag.com/magazine/living/whats-wrong-with-fast-fashion source] also is not the best, they link externally, the original source should be cited. Some of their writing is conjecture. |
| + | I found the original sources and their content was better and also had more information. While the information was the same, the sources ([https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/publications/a-new-textiles-economy-redesigning-fashions-future source],[https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2014/07/where-does-discarded-clothing-go/374613/ source]) were more credible. | ||
Latest revision as of 17:29, 25 March 2021
sources
This source is not the best because they do not cite any of their statistics and was written by a student reporter This source also is not the best, they link externally, the original source should be cited. Some of their writing is conjecture. I found the original sources and their content was better and also had more information. While the information was the same, the sources (source,source) were more credible.
