Difference between revisions of "Talk:Cyberbullying"
From SI410
(Promising article. Could use organization and ethical analysis. More notes in Discussion Tab.) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | == Winter 2017 Notes == | ||
| + | * See notes from previous semester -- they still stand. | ||
| + | * This article is really promising. It could use an ethical analysis section and perhaps some organizational help. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Previous Semester Notes == | ||
The initial description paragraph of this topic reads like the introduction to an essay. It is more persuasive than informational, which makes for a biased wiki. | The initial description paragraph of this topic reads like the introduction to an essay. It is more persuasive than informational, which makes for a biased wiki. | ||
The cyberbullying vs traditional bullying section conveys very little information. It's mostly fluff. It keeps mentioning anonymity after it was already discussed. It constantly mentioning how cyberbullying is more harmful, yet gives very few examples, just more fluff. | The cyberbullying vs traditional bullying section conveys very little information. It's mostly fluff. It keeps mentioning anonymity after it was already discussed. It constantly mentioning how cyberbullying is more harmful, yet gives very few examples, just more fluff. | ||
Latest revision as of 15:22, 17 April 2017
Winter 2017 Notes
- See notes from previous semester -- they still stand.
- This article is really promising. It could use an ethical analysis section and perhaps some organizational help.
Previous Semester Notes
The initial description paragraph of this topic reads like the introduction to an essay. It is more persuasive than informational, which makes for a biased wiki.
The cyberbullying vs traditional bullying section conveys very little information. It's mostly fluff. It keeps mentioning anonymity after it was already discussed. It constantly mentioning how cyberbullying is more harmful, yet gives very few examples, just more fluff.
