Difference between revisions of "Talk:Censorship"
(Created page with "One of the concerns that may arise during collaborative editing relates to the presentation of content within an article. For instance, I wanted to present my ideas in the form o...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
One of the concerns that may arise during collaborative editing relates to the presentation of content within an article. For instance, I wanted to present my ideas in the form of bullet points under the "Types of Censorship" category because I felt that it would be a better way to organize information in this category and attract the reader. However, when I logged in after a few days and looked at the article again, I noticed that another user had rearranged the information in a different format. The content was reorganized in a sub-heading format instead of a bullet point format. Thus, it may be significant to note that in an environment like this all users may not prefer the same style of presentation. In that case, every user will have a different view about the concept of improving an article in terms of how it is presented. The term "improvement", in this case, does not relate to the content, but it becomes a subjective idea that varies from person to person. | One of the concerns that may arise during collaborative editing relates to the presentation of content within an article. For instance, I wanted to present my ideas in the form of bullet points under the "Types of Censorship" category because I felt that it would be a better way to organize information in this category and attract the reader. However, when I logged in after a few days and looked at the article again, I noticed that another user had rearranged the information in a different format. The content was reorganized in a sub-heading format instead of a bullet point format. Thus, it may be significant to note that in an environment like this all users may not prefer the same style of presentation. In that case, every user will have a different view about the concept of improving an article in terms of how it is presented. The term "improvement", in this case, does not relate to the content, but it becomes a subjective idea that varies from person to person. | ||
| + | |||
| + | - Asad Qureshi | ||
Revision as of 08:29, 18 December 2011
One of the concerns that may arise during collaborative editing relates to the presentation of content within an article. For instance, I wanted to present my ideas in the form of bullet points under the "Types of Censorship" category because I felt that it would be a better way to organize information in this category and attract the reader. However, when I logged in after a few days and looked at the article again, I noticed that another user had rearranged the information in a different format. The content was reorganized in a sub-heading format instead of a bullet point format. Thus, it may be significant to note that in an environment like this all users may not prefer the same style of presentation. In that case, every user will have a different view about the concept of improving an article in terms of how it is presented. The term "improvement", in this case, does not relate to the content, but it becomes a subjective idea that varies from person to person.
- Asad Qureshi
