Difference between revisions of "Talk:Cambridge Analytica"

From SI410
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "This is a good start. You should move your "Introduction" section to above your contents box. Also, I'd like to see more course content about ethics involved. You get into wha...")
 
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
Elizabeth Whittaker
 
Elizabeth Whittaker
 +
 +
 +
Comment by Flannery O'Donnell:
 +
I would recommend changing the format of your references to match with Wikipedia's style. In order to do this, insert the citation in your text whenever you reference an article (aka any place where an in-text citation would occur in an academic article). The format is : <ref>CITATION</ref>. For example, your first reference would be formatted as <ref>Cambridge Analytica. (n.d.). Retrieved March 13, 2019, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cambridge_Analytica</ref>. I wanted to go in and do some for you to be helpful, but it is hard for me to be sure where you referenced each article. Hope this is clear!

Revision as of 17:41, 21 March 2019

This is a good start. You should move your "Introduction" section to above your contents box. Also, I'd like to see more course content about ethics involved. You get into what some of the ethical concerns are, I think course material could help provide a framework for the reader to use to think about them.

Elizabeth Whittaker


Comment by Flannery O'Donnell:

I would recommend changing the format of your references to match with Wikipedia's style. In order to do this, insert the citation in your text whenever you reference an article (aka any place where an in-text citation would occur in an academic article). The format is : [1]. For example, your first reference would be formatted as [2]. I wanted to go in and do some for you to be helpful, but it is hard for me to be sure where you referenced each article. Hope this is clear!
  1. CITATION
  2. Cambridge Analytica. (n.d.). Retrieved March 13, 2019, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cambridge_Analytica