Difference between revisions of "Talk:Bryce Smith"
m |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
== Meelan Patel == | == Meelan Patel == | ||
Hi, I enjoyed reading about your data identity! You did a good job analyzing the information about you online and what kind of an impression it gives off to the public. To improve, you should compare this to your real identity to see if it was accurate or not. Furthermore, add details from the readings to dive into, possibly regarding the ethicality of data profiles as u mention in the conclusion. In terms of style, consider making the images a bit bigger for readability. There was some grammatical errors as well but other than that it very good. | Hi, I enjoyed reading about your data identity! You did a good job analyzing the information about you online and what kind of an impression it gives off to the public. To improve, you should compare this to your real identity to see if it was accurate or not. Furthermore, add details from the readings to dive into, possibly regarding the ethicality of data profiles as u mention in the conclusion. In terms of style, consider making the images a bit bigger for readability. There was some grammatical errors as well but other than that it very good. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Ben Rogers== | ||
| + | Your data identity analysis intrigued me, as you did a good job not providing any intimate details about yourself. Details such as, your actual geographical location, major, etc., was strictly narrative from searches on yourself. My name is grossly common as well and had issues primarily with search functions, but the data broker was filled with information (90% incorrect). I believe your assumption that the deletion protocols you've previously taken wiped you clean, which is a rather refreshing notion. As, someone has previously stated, I believe your work will be great (by class standards) if you include text from the readings. The line, "how we appear online may not be totally under our control" in your writing, could be correlated with the writing from Dan Cocking (one of our readings), whom states that we maintain privacy, by constructing our online personas. This reading could present arguments and counterarguments on your personal feelings for maintaining privacy online. It was a fantastic piece, great work. | ||
Latest revision as of 21:33, 19 February 2020
Brady Hicks
I thought this was a well written, in-depth analysis of your online profile, or rather, lack of one. I liked the way you presented your reasoning behind why you didn't think you'd have a big presence online, and your explanation of who your online profile would represent. One thing worth looking into is that at the beginning, you say you expected to find an inaccurate representation of yourself, but you never come back to that point to say if it was inaccurate. I know you said you're cautious about what you put online, but it would be interesting to see how your online profile compares to the real you. Another thing that might be helpful is including some thoughts from the authors of our in-class readings as discussion points maybe discussing benefits and drawbacks of not having an online profile. There were also a few grammatical errors throughout, so I recommend just reading over it again and you'll catch them. Overall though, I thought it was well done.
Meelan Patel
Hi, I enjoyed reading about your data identity! You did a good job analyzing the information about you online and what kind of an impression it gives off to the public. To improve, you should compare this to your real identity to see if it was accurate or not. Furthermore, add details from the readings to dive into, possibly regarding the ethicality of data profiles as u mention in the conclusion. In terms of style, consider making the images a bit bigger for readability. There was some grammatical errors as well but other than that it very good.
Ben Rogers
Your data identity analysis intrigued me, as you did a good job not providing any intimate details about yourself. Details such as, your actual geographical location, major, etc., was strictly narrative from searches on yourself. My name is grossly common as well and had issues primarily with search functions, but the data broker was filled with information (90% incorrect). I believe your assumption that the deletion protocols you've previously taken wiped you clean, which is a rather refreshing notion. As, someone has previously stated, I believe your work will be great (by class standards) if you include text from the readings. The line, "how we appear online may not be totally under our control" in your writing, could be correlated with the writing from Dan Cocking (one of our readings), whom states that we maintain privacy, by constructing our online personas. This reading could present arguments and counterarguments on your personal feelings for maintaining privacy online. It was a fantastic piece, great work.
