Difference between revisions of "Talk:Big Market Acquisitions - Microsoft"

From SI410
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "== Length == The article seems like it is missing quite a bit of the elements there. This leads to a lack of words towards the 3000 word counts. The article’s length is arou...")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Length ==
 
== Length ==
 
The article seems like it is missing quite a bit of the elements there. This leads to a lack of words towards the 3000 word counts. The article’s length is around 300 words. There seems to be a lot of open opportunities for the author to add more elements to the article and work towards the goal of 3000 words.
 
The article seems like it is missing quite a bit of the elements there. This leads to a lack of words towards the 3000 word counts. The article’s length is around 300 words. There seems to be a lot of open opportunities for the author to add more elements to the article and work towards the goal of 3000 words.
 +
 +
== Structure ==
 +
There is an opening paragraph that summarizes the topic. The opening paragraph does a good job in explaining the history and the growth of the Microsoft company. The body of the article is in one or more sections. More specifically, the article is split into 5 different sections. There is a reference listed on the bottom of the article. However, it does not seem like the reference is linked to anything within the article, making it hard to locate what statement is being backed up by the reference. The opening paragraph really touched on the history of the Microsoft company, but not a lot on the specific topic of Big market acquisitions. The author can probably pinpoint a little more towards the topic and put the opening paragraph in a separate section.

Revision as of 20:01, 4 February 2022

Length

The article seems like it is missing quite a bit of the elements there. This leads to a lack of words towards the 3000 word counts. The article’s length is around 300 words. There seems to be a lot of open opportunities for the author to add more elements to the article and work towards the goal of 3000 words.

Structure

There is an opening paragraph that summarizes the topic. The opening paragraph does a good job in explaining the history and the growth of the Microsoft company. The body of the article is in one or more sections. More specifically, the article is split into 5 different sections. There is a reference listed on the bottom of the article. However, it does not seem like the reference is linked to anything within the article, making it hard to locate what statement is being backed up by the reference. The opening paragraph really touched on the history of the Microsoft company, but not a lot on the specific topic of Big market acquisitions. The author can probably pinpoint a little more towards the topic and put the opening paragraph in a separate section.