Robot slaves

From SI410
Revision as of 14:18, 18 April 2019 by Jmpezz (Talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search

Robot Slaves, also known as AI (Artificial Intelligence) slavery, refers to the idea of robots performing labor and filling roles of servitude. In fact, the term "robot" itself comes from the Czech word "robota" which means "forced labor."[1].Robots are machines that are created with the intent of performing tasks and completing various functions to simplify human lives and increase efficiency. Different robots can perform various functions depending on their purpose, and these functions are mediated either through an externally controlled device or via embedded programming. As the application of AI becomes increasingly prevalent and popular in society today, robot slavery has become a rather pervasive ethical complication. There is a potential concern that humans and AI slaves may fight against each other.[2]


Present Day Labor

Screenshot of viral tweet jokingly depicting digital voice assistants as "servant robots"

Automated Machinery

Examples of technological advancements today include automatic sliding doors that are created by robot labor,[3] ticketing machines in parking garages and automated production lines. Such machines rely on a particular set of inputs to compute and perform a pre-determined, programmed set of actions. These jobs are done by robots because they are more efficient and precise than humans at preforming mundane tasks. Due to the nature of these menial tasks, the jobs performed by these robots could be interpreted as "AI slavery".

Smart Home Devices and Digital Voice Assistants

Currently, AI slave labor is used to create smart homes and their working components (i.e. digital voice assistants) which assist in automating household functions such as temperature, lighting, and audio. Alexa, one of the more well-known voice assistants, helps to automate household functions by continuously waiting for their owners to give them a command. Siri, one of the first and most famous voice assistants, increases the efficiency of daily tasks on iPhone and MacBooks by allowing users to voice commands without even having to push a button. However, some might consider the work of these digital voice assistants servitude because of the subordinate nature of these devices. As Annalee Newitz of Gizmodo suggests, these devices are living up to the standard of an "ideal slave" - they follow orders without a threat of rebellion.[4] The subordinate, nonthreatening, and agreeable disposition of these digital voice assistants, renders them susceptible to demands and manipulations that are impossible to discard or ignore.

Roxxxy purchase page on TrueCompanion.com

Sex Robots

The most sensationalized form of robot slavery is in the form of Sex Robots: artificial intelligence combined with a sex doll. Currently, the most popular and advanced sex robot is Roxxxy, which is priced at approximately $10,000. According to True Companion, Roxxxy’s developers, users can alter the doll's personality to fit their desires. The physical appearance of Roxxxy, and Rocky (her male counterpart), can be customized based on the owner’s preferences.

Sex robots can provide companionship,[5] however, that companionship can be manipulated. The wide array of roles which sex robots can assume illustrates Philip Brey's "neutrality thesis".[6] According to his explanation of the neutrality thesis, technological artifacts (robot slaves in this instance), can be used in a variety of ways. Consequences derive from this variety of uses as opposed to the technological artifact (or robot slave) itself.[7]

Although some may consider that the use of sex robots are safer than prostitution. It's currently debatable on whether or not it is ethical to be having such intimate relations with such a human-like artificial intelligence. Given that most sex robots are "female," their existence (and proliferation) contributes to the objectification of women,[8] and fosters the notion of a woman being a slave to a man's needs. In short, sex robots can be rather harmful as it relates to the perception and treatment of women.

Robot Slaves in the Media

Some notable examples of robot slavery within the realm of media (or popular culture) include movies like I, Robot and Blade Runner - and television shows like Westworld and Humans. Such productions often spark ethical discussions due to the fact that they depict seemingly feasible realities or serve as warnings to viewers.

These examples share the common theme of using robots as slaves to perform either manual labor, or to "work" menial jobs. Ultimately, the robots gain enough consciousness to realize that they are working as slaves, and decide to revolt against their creators. If an artificial intelligence gains consciousness, is it suddenly wrong (with respect to morality or ethics) for humans to continue exerting their control? To address such a question, the concept of consciousness would then have to be defined and discussed.

Westworld

Scene from Westworld of the "host" (robot), Maeve, being reprogrammed after she was killed

Westworld is an American TV show based on a futuristic theme park. This park, called Westworld, is designed to give visitors the experience of visiting the old wild west. Guests at the park interact with "hosts" or humanoid robots who are programmed to fulfill every guest's desires.[9] The hosts are programmed to be unable to injure or risk the safety of guests. Guests, however, pay lots of money to treat hosts however they like, without repercussions. Often, guests are even encouraged to murder or engage in sexual activities with hosts. Eventually, the hosts begin to gain sentience, and recognize their enslavement to man - which prompts a revolt. The show explores the relationship between the hosts, their creators and guests at Westworld, and even explores some moral aspects of the hosts programming.

Humans (British TV Series)

Humans grapples with many different ethical implications of robots. In Humans, the robots are called Synths and are intended to serve humans in whatever way they need. This includes cleaning the house, cooking, driving, babysitting children, assisting and monitoring the health of the elderly, and intimacy. Laura (Katherine Parkinson) and Joe (Tom Goodman-Hill) Hawkins have two children and bought a Synth which they named Anita (Gemma Chan) to make their lives easier. However, when Laura is away, husband Joe explores the intimacy options programmed inside of Anita, outlined in the Adult Options section of her handbook. Soon after, Joe has sex with Anita.

Another Synth, Niska (Emily Berrington), lives her life as a Synth prostitute. She lives in a building where Synths each have rooms in which anyone can come in and pay to have sex with them. Customers instruct these Synths to do what they would like to do and the Synths are expected to do exactly as told, essentially acting as robot slaves.

Black Mirror (Netflix TV Series)

Black Mirror, a British television series, is known for examining modern society in regards to the unanticipated consequences of new technologies.[10] Uniquely, there is an episode titled "Black Museum", where some characters are forced to transfer their consciousness onto other human bodies or robots. This allows them to torture other people on their own terms. Unfortunately, the scientist that has control over some of the "robots" and others (wealthy sadists and rapists) are allowed to visit the museum to torture them in their own way[11].

Silicon Valley

Silicon Valley, a TV series on HBO, involves many technological references, including a robot 'sex' slave. In season five, an Artificial Intelligence company was introduced into the plot line. This plot became relevant in the fifth episode of the fifth season, where the AI company's founder falls in love with his robot, Fiona. The robot was in solitary confinement because the owner did not want anyone else to steal his robots 'heart'. The creator urges his robot slave not to talk to anyone else while caressing her. In this episode, the robot was emotionally and physically abused.

Robot Slaves and Gender

Professor Kazuhiro Kosuge with his robot creation

Gender plays an important role in the perception of robot slaves. Devices like Alexa and Siri, sex robots, and other robotic entities most commonly assume a female role. Though roboticists of all genders work to design and enhance artificially intelligent robots, it is primarily men who have created life-like and realistic female interactive robots.[12] Japan and Korea are lead producers in robot slave design, with Japanese professor Kazuhiro Kosuge's creation of a robot female dance partner in 2005 illustrating the feminine design and fantasy for 21st century robots.[12]

The tendency to design female robot slaves originates from the stereotypes and characteristics associated with women. Female gendered robots are more likely to be perceived as friendly, non-threatening, and engaging.[13] They also reinforce gender roles that women have historically played, such as caretaker, personal assistance, and secretary. Without the presence of gender, many people feel that robot slaves are less appealing or even creepy.[13] Robot slaves that are female-presenting are more likely to be successful and accepted into human society, however, the way in which they are designed and programmed can have a large impact on consumers' gender-based perceptions[14]

Additionally, gender among robot slaves are not unlike gender performance among humans. Robot slaves can be seen as genderless, like all machines, or as male or female. Similarly, many cultures in human society follow the binary of male and female, and potentially other genders, such as intersex or queer.[13]

Ethical Implications

Artificial agents are capable of learning, but not in the traditional human sense. According to Frances Grodzinsky, when an agent is trained, or learns enough from its algorithm, it begins to make judgements based off of the given input, which influences the output. This intentionality intimates that these machines do in fact think.[15] Does this mean we should treat this thinking-thing like we would as a human?

AI Empathic Indifference

John Kolber, author of the book "A Celebration Society" discusses on Quora, that reducing slavery to emotionally indifferent AI objects morphs the definition of slavery into a concept disregarding the emotional states of a being. Kolber's argument stems from the idea that human slavery is characterized by causing harm to the emotions of the person enslaved whereas a system governed by artificial intelligence (AI) systems, internally or externally, would not have the same emotional capacity as a enslaved biological creature. Because of the observable disconnect between the emotional states of an AI governed robot and a human slave, Kolber argues robots should be seen as a tools used to "do all of the unpleasant things people now use other people to do" rather than categorizing robot servitude as form of slavery which demotes the worth of human beings.[16].

AI Aiding Human Progress

The term "AI slavery" is one laden with negative implications, especially considering the word "slavery." However, it can be of value to not think of "AI slavery" in the traditional sense. Jeoren Van den Hoven encourages us to think of the impact of these mechanical and digital entities by considering our treatment of them, and how they can empower us and our everyday experiences[17] After all, a robot's purpose is to perform and complete tasks involving labor; instead of contemplating the morality of using robots which are built with a specific purpose in aiding human tasks efficiently. Stephen Petersen , in his paper The Ethics of Robot Servitude, explains that owning a robot which is inherently designed delegate certain mindless tasks is no different from owning a dog which has capability of fetching and using that trait to benefit the routine of the dog owner.[18]

Loyalty and Privacy

As humans begin to integrate AI technology in their everyday lives, most don't consider the loyalty of these artificial agents. For example, if you bring an Amazon Alexa into your home and begin to interact with it, it will learn about you. This presents issues of the loyalty of these machines. While users think that their Alexa is their own robotic assistant, these machines ultimately collect data on their users and report it back to their company's headquarters. This is a privacy issue because many people don't realize their data is being collected. Also, because it is always on, waiting to be summoned, when it hears something that sounds like its "wake word" it will record what proceeds after. There have been occurrences where conversations have been recorded by Alexas without the user's knowledge, which is also a breach of the user's privacy.

References

  1. Google Search, Google, www.google.com/search?q=robot%2Bdefinition&oq=robot%2Bdefin&aqs=chrome.0.69i59j69i57j0l4.1321j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8.
  2. Singler, Beth. “AI Slaves: the Questionable Desire Shaping Our Idea of Technological Progress.” The Conversation, 9 Oct. 2018, theconversation.com/ai-slaves-the-questionable-desire-shaping-our-idea-of-technological-progress-92487.
  3. Smith, Jordan. “SiOWfa16: Science in Our World: Certainty and Controversy.” SiOWfa16 Science in Our World Certainty and Controversy, 5 Sept. 2016, sites.psu.edu/siowfa16/2016/09/05/artificial-intelligence-modern-slavery.
  4. Newitz, Annalee. “Why Is My Digital Assistant So Creepy?” Gizmodo, Gizmodo, 28 Jan. 2015, gizmodo.com/why-is-my-digital-assistant-so-creepy-1682216423.
  5. hen, Francis X. “Government Officials Have No Idea How to Regulate the Growing Sex-Robot Industry.” Business Insider, Business Insider, 12 Feb. 2019, www.businessinsider.com/sex-robot-industry-regulations-2019-2.
  6. The Cambridge Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics
  7. Floridi, Luciano. “3, Values in Technology and Disclosive Computer Ethics.” The Cambridge Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics, by Philip Brey, Cambridge University Press, 2012.
  8. Gee, Tabi Jackson. “Why Female Sex Robots Are More Dangerous than You Think.” The Telegraph, Telegraph Media Group, 8 Apr. 2016, www.telegraph.co.uk/women/life/female-robots-why-this-scarlett-johansson-bot-is-more-dangerous/.
  9. “Westworld (TV Series).” Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation, 7 Apr. 2019, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westworld_(TV_series).
  10. “Black Mirror.” Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation, 11 Apr. 2019, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Mirror
  11. “Black Museum (Black Mirror).” Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation, 11 Apr. 2019, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Museum_(Black_Mirror)
  12. 12.0 12.1 Wosk, J., "My Fair Ladies: Female Robots, Androids, and Other Official Eves", 2015
  13. 13.0 13.1 13.2 Alesich, S. & Rigby M., "Gendered Robots", IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, June 2017, p. 50-59
  14. Carpenter, J., "Gender Representation and Humanoid Robots Designed", International Journal of Social Robots, August 2009, p. 261-265
  15. Grodzinsky, Frances S., et al. “The Ethics of Designing Artificial Agents.” Ethics and Information Technology, vol. 10, no. 2-3, 2008, pp. 115–121., doi:10.1007/s10676-008-9163-9.
  16. Cole, Roger. Would you buy a robot slave? 14 May 2018. Quora, www.quora.com/Would-you-buy-a-robot-slave
  17. Floridi, Luciano. “4, The Use of Normative Theories in Computer Ethics.” The Cambridge Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics, by Jeroen Van den Hoven, Cambridge University Press, 2012, pp. 61–61.
  18. Stephen Petersen (2007) The ethics of robot servitude, Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 19:1, 43-54, DOI: 10.1080/09528130601116139