Difference between revisions of "Online Dating"
(→Popular Use) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
== Popular Use == | == Popular Use == | ||
| + | Despite the economic recession, online dating websites have reported increased traffic to their sites that may be due to the unemployed having more time, and online dating as an inexpensive alternative to meeting people. | ||
| − | + | Relationships formed through online dating sites do not always constitute a romantic one, and if they are, do not always progress solely through virtual processes. It is found that many users choose to arrange a physical encounter rather quickly, than get to know another user exclusively online. [] | |
| − | + | ||
| − | Relationships formed through online dating sites do not always constitute a romantic one, and if they are, do not always progress solely through virtual processes. | + | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
== Ethical Implications == | == Ethical Implications == | ||
Revision as of 15:47, 5 October 2011
Online dating is the "use of websites that provide a database of potential partners--typically in close geographical proximity--that one can browse and contact, generally for a fee." [1] Popular examples of online dating websites include Match.com, eHarmony.com, okCupid.com, and plentyOfFish.com.
Online dating sites are characterized by the use of online profiles and recommender systems.
Profiles
Popular Use
Despite the economic recession, online dating websites have reported increased traffic to their sites that may be due to the unemployed having more time, and online dating as an inexpensive alternative to meeting people.
Relationships formed through online dating sites do not always constitute a romantic one, and if they are, do not always progress solely through virtual processes. It is found that many users choose to arrange a physical encounter rather quickly, than get to know another user exclusively online. []
Ethical Implications
In 2010, Carole Markin sued Match.com, an online dating site, for failing to have background check on its users. On a date arranged through the site, she was sexually assaulted by a registered sex offender, Alan Paul Wurtzel [2]. The court case brought up issues of relationships facilitated through online interactions, specifically about the anonymity and deceitful techniques of users.
Various critics, including modern Luddites, have focused on online dating sites as evidence of the deteriorating morals of human relationships caused by technology. Some arguments include that online dating sites seek to commodify human intimacy, and reduce the sanctity of love to something that can be advertised, bought and found through a search engine. [1]
References
1. Sautter, 2010, p. 555
2. Williams, 2011, Los Angeles Times, "Match.com agrees to screen for sex offenders to settle lawsuit"
