Difference between revisions of "Neurotechnology"

From SI410
Jump to: navigation, search
(ref)
(ref)
Line 10: Line 10:
  
  
<h2> Medical Devices </h2>
+
<h2> Medical Devices </h2>  
These types of devices are employed to assist users who have lost function, by providing them with technological alternatives. Current forms of assistive applications include BCIs that enable users to communicate via “mental typing” and auditory assistance for those with neurodegenerative diseases that affect communication. Newer possibilities for assistive BCIs include the ability to control wheelchairs or similar devices. <ref>Vlek, Rutger (June,2012). https://journals.lww.com/jnpt/FullText/2012/06000/Ethical_Issues_in_Brain_Computer_Interface.8.aspx?casa_token=C18A3mf2Y5EAAAAA:wwz9lj2qZSJCWAQFV4lR8-fmWUeidUMQ9CcznLLjfeV4UJQhRBKmbqGiR2Nw3jNeCJEPdXCo2bQs9X2WGWGgmQ2sK1wM "Ethical Issues in Brain–Computer Interface Research, Development, and Dissemination"]. Retrieved January 26, 2022.</ref>  
+
  
  
 
<h4>Assistive Applications</h4>
 
<h4>Assistive Applications</h4>
 +
These types of devices are employed to assist users who have lost function, by providing them with technological alternatives. Current forms of assistive applications include BCIs that enable users to communicate via “mental typing” and auditory assistance for those with neurodegenerative diseases that affect communication. Newer possibilities for assistive BCIs include the ability to control wheelchairs or similar devices. <ref>Vlek, Rutger (June,2012). https://journals.lww.com/jnpt/FullText/2012/06000/Ethical_Issues_in_Brain_Computer_Interface.8.aspx?casa_token=C18A3mf2Y5EAAAAA:wwz9lj2qZSJCWAQFV4lR8-fmWUeidUMQ9CcznLLjfeV4UJQhRBKmbqGiR2Nw3jNeCJEPdXCo2bQs9X2WGWGgmQ2sK1wM "Ethical Issues in Brain–Computer Interface Research, Development, and Dissemination"]. Retrieved January 26, 2022.</ref>
 +
 
<h4>Rehabilitative Applications</h4>
 
<h4>Rehabilitative Applications</h4>
 +
These types of devices trigger neural plasticity which over time allow the users own neural pathways recover control over their limb. They function by detecting and interpreting a user's attempt or thought of movement, then artificially moving the limb with a robotic aid or by stimulation of the muscles. <ref>Vlek, Rutger (June,2012). https://journals.lww.com/jnpt/FullText/2012/06000/Ethical_Issues_in_Brain_Computer_Interface.8.aspx?casa_token=C18A3mf2Y5EAAAAA:wwz9lj2qZSJCWAQFV4lR8-fmWUeidUMQ9CcznLLjfeV4UJQhRBKmbqGiR2Nw3jNeCJEPdXCo2bQs9X2WGWGgmQ2sK1wM "Ethical Issues in Brain–Computer Interface Research, Development, and Dissemination"]. Retrieved January 26, 2022.</ref>
  
 
<h2>Civilian Devices </h2>
 
<h2>Civilian Devices </h2>

Revision as of 03:57, 28 January 2022


Background

Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs) connect a user's brain directly to a computer, enabling them to act with their mind, without using their muscles and nerves. They do so by detecting and interpreting neural activity [1]. First defined by Jonathan Wolpaw in the 1990s, noninvasive BCIs began gaining traction amongst the scientific community, looking to explore its potential capabilities. [2] After many scientists had contributed to discoveries of EEGs and electrical signals in the brain Jacques Vidal published his paper in 1973 “Toward Direct Brain-Computer Communications” which detailed the brain's ability to communicate with external devices. [3]


Existing Applications


Medical Devices


Assistive Applications

These types of devices are employed to assist users who have lost function, by providing them with technological alternatives. Current forms of assistive applications include BCIs that enable users to communicate via “mental typing” and auditory assistance for those with neurodegenerative diseases that affect communication. Newer possibilities for assistive BCIs include the ability to control wheelchairs or similar devices. [4]

Rehabilitative Applications

These types of devices trigger neural plasticity which over time allow the users own neural pathways recover control over their limb. They function by detecting and interpreting a user's attempt or thought of movement, then artificially moving the limb with a robotic aid or by stimulation of the muscles. [5]

Civilian Devices

Emergent Applications

Ethical Implications

Privacy

Autonomy

Hacking

Matrix of Domination

Distributive Justice

Normality

Identity

References

  1. Friedrich, Orsolya (2021). "Clinical Neurotechnology meets Artificial Intelligence". Retrieved January 25, 2022.
  2. Friedrich, Orsolya (2021). "Clinical Neurotechnology meets Artificial Intelligence". Retrieved January 25, 2022.
  3. Friedrich, Orsolya (2021). "Clinical Neurotechnology meets Artificial Intelligence". Retrieved January 25, 2022.
  4. Vlek, Rutger (June,2012). https://journals.lww.com/jnpt/FullText/2012/06000/Ethical_Issues_in_Brain_Computer_Interface.8.aspx?casa_token=C18A3mf2Y5EAAAAA:wwz9lj2qZSJCWAQFV4lR8-fmWUeidUMQ9CcznLLjfeV4UJQhRBKmbqGiR2Nw3jNeCJEPdXCo2bQs9X2WGWGgmQ2sK1wM "Ethical Issues in Brain–Computer Interface Research, Development, and Dissemination"]. Retrieved January 26, 2022.
  5. Vlek, Rutger (June,2012). https://journals.lww.com/jnpt/FullText/2012/06000/Ethical_Issues_in_Brain_Computer_Interface.8.aspx?casa_token=C18A3mf2Y5EAAAAA:wwz9lj2qZSJCWAQFV4lR8-fmWUeidUMQ9CcznLLjfeV4UJQhRBKmbqGiR2Nw3jNeCJEPdXCo2bQs9X2WGWGgmQ2sK1wM "Ethical Issues in Brain–Computer Interface Research, Development, and Dissemination"]. Retrieved January 26, 2022.