John Walsh Thesis Revision

From SI410
Revision as of 07:54, 10 April 2019 by WikiSysop (Talk | contribs) (Page 13)

Jump to: navigation, search

This page is an exercise in revising a massively plagiarized master's thesis by paraphrasing portions of the text that were either quoted without attribution (no citation) or quoted inappropriately (no quotation marks). In both cases we will re-write individual paragraphs and deposit the results here, by page number.

Here is a link to the New York Times article.

Instructions:

John Walsh plagiarism damage control
  1. Type on your personal notebook a piece of text (paragraph) from the page represented in the New York Times article of July 23, 2014.
  2. Edit to rephrase in your own words, avoiding close paraphrasing as much as possible.
  3. Cut and past results into this document on the proper page in the proper order, if possible.
  4. Do minor formatting or editing as needed.
  5. BONUS. If you are editing a passage without attribution, insert the reference.

Page 1

Page 2

Page 3

Page 4

Page 5

Page 6

Page 7

Page 8

Page 9

Page 10

Page 11

Page 12

Page 13

Page 14

To sum up, the issue lies in the fact that the US government is still learning about its actions in Iraq— while this is happening, Iraqi people are contending with the losses that war brought upon its country, all while taking directives from an imperialist American government forcing reconstruction by imposing democracy and American ideals. In the context of the US’s failures during the war and their inability to reconstruct Iraq afterwards, it is doubtful but possible that the Middle East could become friendlier to the idea of democracy. [1]

While the Bush administration wishes to see Iraq as a mature democracy, they acknowledge the low odds of this happening and the difficulty arising by getting involved in the Middle East. He has affirmed on numerous occasions that "The democratic progress we've seen in the Middle East was not imposed from abroad, neither will the greater progress we've seen in the Middle East was not imposed from abroad, and neither will the greater progress we hope to see. He has also warned that democratic development will not come swiftly, or smoothly, to the Middle East, any more than it did to America and Europe.

References

  1. Diamond, L. (2005). Lessons from Iraq. Journal Of Democracy, 16(1), 9-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/jod.2005.0004