Difference between revisions of "John Walsh Thesis Revision"
From SI410
m |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
= Page 2 = | = Page 2 = | ||
| + | While the idea that more democracies in the world would theoretically advance U.S. and global interests, the United States should remember that the concept of a democracy is neither inherently good or bad, it is is neutral and the U.S. must be careful when attempting to spread democracy. | ||
= Page 3 = | = Page 3 = | ||
Revision as of 21:12, 14 March 2018
This page is an exercise in revising a massively plagiarized master's thesis by paraphrasing portions of the text that were either quoted without attribution (no citation) or quoted inappropriately (no quotation marks). In both cases we will re-write individual paragraphs and deposit the results here, by page number.
Here is a link to the New York Times article.
Instructions:
- Type on your personal notebook a piece of text (paragraph) from the page represented in the New York Times article of July 23, 2014.
- Edit to rephrase in your own words, avoiding close paraphrasing as much as possible.
- Cut and past results into this document on the proper page in the proper order, if possible.
- Do minor formatting or editing as needed.
- BONUS. If you are editing a passage without attribution, insert the reference.
Contents
Page 1
Page 2
While the idea that more democracies in the world would theoretically advance U.S. and global interests, the United States should remember that the concept of a democracy is neither inherently good or bad, it is is neutral and the U.S. must be careful when attempting to spread democracy.
