Difference between revisions of "Internet Censorship in Hong Kong"

From SI410
Jump to: navigation, search
(Deleted two sections that contained no citations)
(Censored Material: Changed section to be about media censorship)
Line 9: Line 9:
 
This "right to freedom of expression" allows for more leniency with censorship on the Internet in relation to other countries that do not stress such freedoms within their governmental charters.
 
This "right to freedom of expression" allows for more leniency with censorship on the Internet in relation to other countries that do not stress such freedoms within their governmental charters.
  
== Censored Material ==
+
== Media Censorship ==
 +
On February 11, 2021, China banned the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC), from broadcasting throughout the entire country for its role in reporting about the COVID-19 pandemic.<ref>China: Statement by the Spokesperson on the BBC ban. EEAS - European External Action Service - European Commission. (2021). Retrieved 20 April 2021, from https://eeas.europa.eu/headquarters/headquarters-homepage_en/93092/China:%20Statement%20by%20the%20Spokesperson%20on%20the%20BBC%20ban.</ref> This came a week after the U.K.’s Office of Communications stripped a Chinese media company of their broadcasting license after finding that they had no editorial control over the state-owned China Global Television Network.<ref>Chappell, B. (2021). U.K. Strips Chinese Broadcaster's License, Citing Communist Party Ties. Npr.org. Retrieved 20 April 2021, from https://www.npr.org/2021/02/04/964045278/u-k-strips-chinese-broadcasters-license-citing-communist-party-ties.</ref> China’s National Radio and Television Administration (NRTA) released a statement saying that the BBC World News’ China-related reports “seriously violated the requirements that news should be truthful and fair, harming China’s national interests and undermining China’s national unity,” and as such would not accept its application for a broadcasting license the following year.<ref>国家广播电视总局 公告公示 简 讯. Nrta.gov.cn. (2021). Retrieved 20 April 2021, from http://www.nrta.gov.cn/art/2021/2/12/art_113_55123.html.</ref>
  
 +
However, the BBC is not the first media outlet to have been restricted by the Chinese government. In August of 2020, a few weeks after Hong Kong’s controversial new national security laws went into effect, the offices where the newspaper Apple Daily is produced and published, were raided by police. This happened just a few hours after the founder of Apple Daily, Jimmy Lai, was arrested by National Security police as part of a larger operation that saw several of his senior executives arrested as well.<ref name = pomfret>Pomfret, J. (2021). Hong Kong police raid on newspaper filmed in real time as China flexes muscles. U.S. Retrieved 20 April 2021, from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-hongkong-security-jimmylai-raid/hong-kong-police-raid-on-newspaper-filmed-in-real-time-as-china-flexes-muscles-idUSKCN25610W.</ref> In 2021, an article was published in the state-run newspaper Ta Kung Pao, accusing “some media organizations of using their status as the so-called fourth estate to engage in collusion with foreign forces, incite violence and produce fabrications.” The article called out the Apple Daily newspaper especially, accusing it of being the “worst offender”, and further saying that Apple Daily “should be shut down because of its slandering reporting and its incitement of Hong Kong independence.”<ref>State-run paper urges ban on Apple Daily to close ‘national security loopholes’ | Apple Daily. Apple Daily 蘋果日報. (2021). Retrieved 20 April 2021, from https://hk.appledaily.com/news/20210416/3XRKD7MMYZEL7D4X7GR5ALIHOA/.</ref>
  
 
== Differences with PRC ==
 
== Differences with PRC ==

Revision as of 18:12, 20 April 2021

Internet Censorship in Hong Kong pertains to the legality involved in the restriction and access of content on the Internet in Hong Kong. Hong Kong, despite being a special administrative region of the People's Republic of China, maintains its own bill of rights which protects freedom of expression in such a way that limits PRC's governmental powers of censorship.

Background

Hong Kong Bill of Rights

Article 16 in Part 2 of the Hong Kong Bill of Rights states[1]:

  • Everyone shall have the right to hold opinions without interference.
  • Everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression; this right shall include freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through any other media of his choice.

This "right to freedom of expression" allows for more leniency with censorship on the Internet in relation to other countries that do not stress such freedoms within their governmental charters.

Media Censorship

On February 11, 2021, China banned the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC), from broadcasting throughout the entire country for its role in reporting about the COVID-19 pandemic.[2] This came a week after the U.K.’s Office of Communications stripped a Chinese media company of their broadcasting license after finding that they had no editorial control over the state-owned China Global Television Network.[3] China’s National Radio and Television Administration (NRTA) released a statement saying that the BBC World News’ China-related reports “seriously violated the requirements that news should be truthful and fair, harming China’s national interests and undermining China’s national unity,” and as such would not accept its application for a broadcasting license the following year.[4]

However, the BBC is not the first media outlet to have been restricted by the Chinese government. In August of 2020, a few weeks after Hong Kong’s controversial new national security laws went into effect, the offices where the newspaper Apple Daily is produced and published, were raided by police. This happened just a few hours after the founder of Apple Daily, Jimmy Lai, was arrested by National Security police as part of a larger operation that saw several of his senior executives arrested as well.[5] In 2021, an article was published in the state-run newspaper Ta Kung Pao, accusing “some media organizations of using their status as the so-called fourth estate to engage in collusion with foreign forces, incite violence and produce fabrications.” The article called out the Apple Daily newspaper especially, accusing it of being the “worst offender”, and further saying that Apple Daily “should be shut down because of its slandering reporting and its incitement of Hong Kong independence.”[6]

Differences with PRC

Umbrella Movement

In 2014, the Hong Kong Umbrella Movement and protests addressed issues concerning a national-security bill that restricted freedom of speech. Due to backing from Beijing, many Hong Kong people turned to the internet to criticize the bill. Thousands of protests, primarily comprised of youth, led to wide international coverage. However, many posts concerning the movement were censored on Weibo, a PRC based application which has many users in Hong Kong.[7] Twitter, however, did not have the same censorship issues. Users were able to bypass this censorship by turning to other applications to help organize for the cause.

Google's Presence in Hong Kong

A brief look at Google search engine's interface as seen from the point of view of Hong Kong internet users is shown above.

Google is one of the first corporations to publicly challenge the People's Republic of China on the issue of internet censorship. In 2010, Google decided to stop censoring its search portal in China, and move its servers to Hong Kong which stirred controversy among the tech community. Only a corporation with the influence of Google, and over 100 million users in China, could put any significant pressure on the Chinese government to reconsider their censorship policies, and it was their intent to do so[8]. While Google originally censored its search results in 2006 when the popular search engine was introduced in China, series of events have forced them to take another look at China's unethical stance on internet censorship. After the Chinese government censored and shut down many of their YouTube and BlogSpot sites, Google engineers discovered unidentified Chinese hackers attempted to gain access to Gmail and read accounts of Chinese dissidents. This was the defining point for Google, and they moved their servers and operations to Hong Kong where they could operate more independently of Chinese government policy[8]. Clearly, Google sought to maintain users' rights and interests in expressing their opinions, accessibility to information, and communicating with others without government restriction[9]. Despite Google’s valiant stand, they still lost a significant amount of revenue in their move from mainland China to Hong Kong, but the advances in popularity of Google in Hong Kong are contributing to a substantial financial recovery. Many analysts claim when Google pulled out of China in 2010 it resulted in losses of over $300 million in revenue, and as many as $600 million in revenue when including losses in the Google Android phone market[8].

Ethical Concerns and Issues

Due to Hong Kong's conflicting policies from the PRC and their own protected freedoms, this becomes an area with many concerns. Many individuals and businesses feel the need to self sensor in order to maintain a positive relationship with Mainland China companies. As a result, their images and online practices follow the stricter laws outlined by Mainland China in order to maintain a better relationship. In addition, press freedom has significantly declined over the past five years, reflecting this shift in China's economic growth and development. [10] Many news outlets have suffered cyberattacks due their anti-Mainland content.

See Also

References

  1. Hong Kong Bill of Rights
  2. China: Statement by the Spokesperson on the BBC ban. EEAS - European External Action Service - European Commission. (2021). Retrieved 20 April 2021, from https://eeas.europa.eu/headquarters/headquarters-homepage_en/93092/China:%20Statement%20by%20the%20Spokesperson%20on%20the%20BBC%20ban.
  3. Chappell, B. (2021). U.K. Strips Chinese Broadcaster's License, Citing Communist Party Ties. Npr.org. Retrieved 20 April 2021, from https://www.npr.org/2021/02/04/964045278/u-k-strips-chinese-broadcasters-license-citing-communist-party-ties.
  4. 国家广播电视总局 公告公示 简 讯. Nrta.gov.cn. (2021). Retrieved 20 April 2021, from http://www.nrta.gov.cn/art/2021/2/12/art_113_55123.html.
  5. Pomfret, J. (2021). Hong Kong police raid on newspaper filmed in real time as China flexes muscles. U.S. Retrieved 20 April 2021, from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-hongkong-security-jimmylai-raid/hong-kong-police-raid-on-newspaper-filmed-in-real-time-as-china-flexes-muscles-idUSKCN25610W.
  6. State-run paper urges ban on Apple Daily to close ‘national security loopholes’ | Apple Daily. Apple Daily 蘋果日報. (2021). Retrieved 20 April 2021, from https://hk.appledaily.com/news/20210416/3XRKD7MMYZEL7D4X7GR5ALIHOA/.
  7. Social Media and the Hong Kong Protests Published 10-01-14
  8. 8.0 8.1 8.2 Sheridan, Michael. “China Faces Internet Showdown; Google’s threat to pull out has brought tensions to boiling point, says Michael Sheridan, Far East Correspondent (Business).” Sunday Times (London, England). 17 January 2010. Newspaper. 30 March 2011: pg. 18.
  9. Mathiesen, K. "Censorship and Access to Expression." in Himma and Tavani. 2008: pp. 573-588.
  10. FREEDOM OF THE PRESS Retrieved 04-24-16

(back to index)