Fake News

From SI410
Revision as of 19:36, 14 March 2019 by Arabines (Talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search

Fake News is a fairly new term given to certain news articles, web posts, pictures, etc.. that intentionally try to spread false information. This false information is usually aimed at damaging a large entity or famous person, however anyone could fall victim. There can be many reasons to create fake news articles but the main ones are to discredit/damage someone or something and to make money off the spreading of the article itself. There are a plethora of ethical issues present in the context of fake news. Yellow Journalism and similar media practices have existed for centuries but the emergence of fake news specifically has ushered in new ethical dilemmas altogether. The biggest ethical problem in this context is that in today's day and age anyone can be a self-proclaimed journalist by posting 'news' online, the main spreaders of fake news are not journalists looking for attraction but are individuals either looking to make money or to deceit others for comedic or political appeal. These individuals lack the ethics and morals of typical journalists, more than likely no one will know their true identity and so anonymity and a lack of an ethical code -along with the average person's gullibility- has created the breeding for fake news observed on social media today.

Background

History

Fake news became a household term in late 2016 - early 2017 as the US presidential candidates, Hilary Clinton and Donald Trump, began to use the term in speeches and social media posts. Who coined the term first is unknown but the origin of the first fake news articles stemmed from a small town -Veles- in Macedonia.[1] It appears that the young adults of Veles figured out a get-rich-quick scheme by pumping out fake news articles to Facebook to gain the advertising money available on the site. Thus a group of teenagers from Macedonia ushered in the era of fake news, writing many articles mainly centered around the 2016 US presidential election. Being the hottest topic of mid-late 2016, any kind of fake news article about Hilary Clinton or Donald Trump was sure to sell online. Stories such as "Pope Francis endorses Donald Trump" and "FBI Agent in Clinton email case found dead" went viral instantly.[2]

Types

Fake news comes in many different forms, there are six easily identifiable types of it: Clickbait, Propaganda, Satire, Sloppy Journalism, Misleading Headlines, and Biased News.[3] Clickbait is defined as stories that intentionally use a ridiculous headline to gain site views at the price of truth and actual content. Propaganda is intentionally writing a story in a biased slant in order to achieve some agenda. Satirical fake news is created with the intention of entertainment and comedy. Sloppy Journalism occurs when the writer of an article/post uses unreliable sources containing fake news, it's not necessarily the writer's fault for spreading fake news case but it is their fault for not double-checking their sources. Misleading headlines are similar to Clickbait but with more substance within the article. Finally, Biased News stories are created to appeal to peoples pre-existing beliefs. Unlike propaganda these articles are written to gain attention not necessarily to shift beliefs.

Ethical problems with Fake News

Intentionally deceiving

The writers/creators of fake news are almost always intentionally deceiving their audience in one manner or another. It can be for monetary gain or simply out of boredom, either way the writers are deceiving an audience, misleading them and potentially causing massive problems. Christopher Blair is a prime example of someone who was bored one day and decided to start writing fake news articles to see people's reactions to his outrageous articles. Blair created his own Facebook page, America's Last Line of Defense -a far right-wing page, where he publishes several articles a day, battering liberals in any way possible.[4] Blair's page does contain a warning that the posts are not real but for many readers, this warning goes unnoticed. Sites like these deceive readers, especially adults and the elderly who have more trouble distinguishing truth from hoax online. What Blair is doing is hurting the readers and those around them who either believe the article themselves or have to break the news that these articles are fake to their loved ones. This kind of intentional deceit can lead to violent interactions in the real world as was seen in the Pizza Gate scandal in 2016.[5]

Proving a point?

References

  1. Wendling, Mike. “The (Almost) Complete History of 'Fake News'.” BBC News, BBC, 22 Jan. 2018, www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-42724320.
  2. Wendling, Mike. “The (Almost) Complete History of 'Fake News'.” BBC News, BBC, 22 Jan. 2018, www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-42724320.
  3. “Explained: What Is Fake News? | Social Media and Filter Bubbles.” Webwise.ie, 2 July 2018, www.webwise.ie/teachers/what-is-fake-news/.
  4. Saslow, Eli. “'Nothing on This Page Is Real': How Lies Become Truth in Online America.” The Washington Post, WP Company, 17 Nov. 2018, www.washingtonpost.com/national/nothing-on-this-page-is-real-how-lies-become-truth-in-online-america/2018/11/17/edd44cc8-e85a-11e8-bbdb-72fdbf9d4fed_story.html.
  5. Tandoc, Edson C, et al. “Defining ‘Fake News.’” Digital Journalism, 30 Aug. 2017.