Difference between revisions of "Emma Muth"

From SI410
Jump to: navigation, search
(first draft)
Line 1: Line 1:
<p>Though I have, like most people, searched myself on the Internet before, I have never approached it asking, “Who does the Internet say I am?” As I began this assignment, I was curious— I have heard many people mention their high school athletics records, club-related activities, or other high-school-related results, and as someone who was homeschooled from preschool until high school graduation, I knew that would not be the case for me. Regardless, I set out, with only my name in my virtual hand, to see what I could find. Most of us are unaware of how our information has so thoroughly permeated so many corners of the Web— even those with no social media at all might find themselves in a corner of the Internet somewhere. And as “the very distinction between online and offline [becomes increasingly] blurred”<ref name = "ref1">"Floridi, Luciano. <i>The Cambridge Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics.</i> Cambridge University Press, 2010, 8.</ref>, <b>this inescapable online presence is almost certainly the future.</b></p>
+
<p>Though I have, like most people, searched myself on the Internet before, I have never approached it asking, “Who does the Internet say I am?” As I began this assignment, I was curious— I have heard many people mention their high school athletics records, club-related activities, or other high-school-related results, and as someone who was homeschooled from preschool until high school graduation, I knew that would not be the case for me. In fact, I was fairly confident I would be happy with my online footprint and the privacy I'd achieved. Regardless, I set out, with only my name in my virtual hand, to see what I could find. While I did find confirmation that I have locked down my personal information fairly successfully, I left with more questions about information "leakage" and questions about the ethical implications of these leaks and their accuracy (or lack thereof).</p>
 +
 
 +
=== A Restricted Perspective ===
 +
<p>At a young age, I learned to be protective of my online identity. When my parents helped me create my first Facebook page on my thirteenth birthday (and not a day sooner), they guided me through keeping it as private as possible and warned me against accepting friend requests from strangers. It is funny how these things from childhood persist— to this day, I always feel a little unsettled if one of my social media accounts is set to public. As an artifact of this, according to my Internet searches, I virtually didn’t exist until I graduated from community college, which is the earliest photo I can find of myself by searching my name (first + last as well as first + middle + last). [[File:Graduation.png|410px|thumbnail|left|The earliest Internet photo of myself that I can find (May 2018)]] Even my decade-old Facebook profile does not directly come up in any searches, though a rogue post—a prize drawing on Facebook that I won from a dentist in my hometown—and comment—me tagging a coworker in about a cat adoption day—did appear at some point. Even the twenty-word bio on my private Instagram, admittedly the most personal information able to be found, paints a fairly generic picture of a senior in college who is majoring in computer science, works at a library, is a Christian, and is either engaged or married as of last July (it isn’t clear from my bio alone). As I tried to read this imagining I was a stranger, it felt like peering in through a window— what you see isn't wrong, but there's a lot missing. You wouldn't know I have three sisters, that my best friend lives in Alaska, that this May will be six years since my aunt died. I've been shaped by these elements of life, but you'd never know that by just peering through the window.</p>
 +
 
 +
=== The Jackpot of LinkedIn ===
 +
<p>Offering a more detailed perspective is LinkedIn, the very first result you get when you search my name. Kudos to Google, it is also the most accurate and detailed search result on page 1, rising above the LinkedIn profile of an Emma Muth in Nevada and an Emma Muth from the 1940 census. Without even clicking on the link, it immediately tells the casual online wanderer or curious classmate that I work (and presumably go to school) at the University of Michigan. Once you click on the link, you can see a treasure trove of details— work, school, and volunteer history that essentially give away where I live (one of the reasons I was hesitant to create a LinkedIn in the first place) and where I've been professionally and educationally for the past six years. While this is the most extensive record of existence I could find, the perspective in many ways is just as limited as my twenty-word Instagram bio. You know that I attend the University of Michigan and have been involved in a few different roles as a student instructor, but what isn't clear is my passion for teaching. It's clear that I've worked as a library clerk for about four years, but no one would know I've actually worked at the library in total for nine years</p>
 +
 
 +
=== Information "Leaks" ===
 +
<p>However, despite my generally locked down identity, unexpected information showed me that information “leaks” may be more common than I realized. The result that surprised me the most was the one with my name on a wedding website called The Knot. I am getting married this year, but we created our wedding page through a different website entirely, so my interest was piqued. When I clicked on it, I found it wasn’t our entire wedding site, but rather just our Target wedding registry with our names and our wedding date. I tried to find information on Target’s Terms and Conditions page about any sort of information sharing with The Knot but found nothing. As a result, I was left wondering when I unknowingly signed off on Target sharing that information with them. While our official wedding website did show up on the first-page search as well, it was well below this link. <b>Information I wanted and intended to share was less accessible than something I didn’t even know I had shared.</b> We’ve talked in class about the obfuscation of information usage introduced by many Terms and Conditions documents and the question of where the responsibility falls—on the user to read the full disclosure of how their information is being used or on the distributors of the technology to make it more easily consumable. While this is a question outside of the scope of this exposition, I believe the practicality of sifting through and deciphering these types of documents should be questioned. If I had a “snapshot” of how my wedding website would use my information, perhaps my perception of this information leak would have changed.</p>
 +
 
 +
=== Am I In Control? ===
 +
<p>Information obtained from Data Brokers made me consider the difference between information leaks and downright inaccurate information; the ethical implications of differentiation are big. When I consulted data brokers, going as far as possible without having to pay, I felt dirty somehow. The supposedly glowing reviews, ranging from “I found out my husband was a cheater!” to “I reconnected with my long-lost sister!” were peppered with warnings and sensationalized pop-ups. I admit the dramatized warnings made me laugh—as if I was going to unearth world-shattering revelations about myself—but simultaneously I wondered how many people had found truth or been led astray by the results here. For example, it listed multiple cities and alternate names for me, but only one in each category was correct. If it couldn’t even guarantee my nicknames were correct, what if someone believed all its claims about my dating profiles (which don’t exist) or arrest record (also nonexistent)? Another data broker claimed a phone number my family had not used in at least a decade was first reported in 2019 and connected to me. Naturally, I started thinking—when did I put that phone number out there? How did they get it, but not until 2019? – THOUGH some of the incorrect information may prevail, many of these sites have methods to request removal – we aren’t powerless (yet). But as they note (https://www.instantcheckmate.com/opt-out/), you aren’t scrubbing your identity from the internet – just people getting it through their search. They claim all their information comes from public records. If people try hard enough they can find it.</p>
  
==My Search Queried Identity ==
 
<p>I anticipated my social media profiles to be the most telling since I am not involved in many newsworthy activities or career pursuits at the moment. However, I was curious about how much information even those would provide. Honestly, I expected it to be limited since my parents have always been big proponents of privacy on social media. When they helped me create my first Facebook page on my thirteenth birthday (and not a day sooner), they guided me through keeping it as private as possible and warned me against accepting friend requests from strangers. It is funny how these things from childhood persist— to this day, I always feel a little unsettled if one of my social media accounts is set to public.
 
Yet despite my generally stricter privacy settings, I have not escaped Google’s wandering PageRank algorithm or the slimy grasp of data brokers. If I ever truly wanted to disappear from the Internet, it might be too late for Emma Anne Muth of southeast Michigan to no longer exist online. (Suddenly all those movies about assuming new identities in order to disappear make a lot more sense.) Admittedly, there is a sense of unease that I am not in control of how I am portrayed on the Internet.</p>
 
===Query: 'Emma Muth' ===
 
<p>According to the Internet, who am I? The first page of results suggests that I am [https://www.aminef.or.id/emma-muth/ Emma Muth], a recent graduate of Drake University who was part of the Fulbright English Teaching Assistant Program in 2019. The second page says that maybe I am a typo, meant to say [https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0616091/ Ellen Muth], the thirty-nine-year-old actress from Milford, Connecticut.
 
However, the first result you get is (kudos to Google) the most accurate— my LinkedIn page, which immediately tells the casual online wanderer or curious classmate (let’s all admit we have Googled our classmates before, or if you haven’t, forget I said anything) that I work and go to school at the University of Michigan, no need to even click on the link. Notably, one of the only accurate Google Image search photos of me is also my LinkedIn photo. While these are accurate, the second and third results are another LinkedIn profile for an Emma Muth in Las Vegas, Nevada and an Instagram account that isn’t mine.</p>
 
[[File:Graduation.png|410px|thumbnail|left|From my community college newspaper website]]
 
<p>The query “Emma Muth Instagram” is the result that provides the most personal look into my life, in contrast to my more professional yet still accurate LinkedIn page. Looking at my Instagram bio you would accurately deduce that I am in college and majoring in computer science, I work at a library, and I’m a Christian. If you are familiar with emoji lingo, you may guess that the ring emoji plus the date given means I was either engaged or married last July. Searching “Emma Muth Instagram” on Google also brings up a school newspaper article and photo of me at the Monroe County Community College graduation. Interestingly, this only came up when I searched “Emma Muth Instagram,” but not when I only searched “Emma Muth” even though the latter is in the caption of the photo.</p>
 
<p><b>The result that surprised me the most</b>, however, was the one with my name on a wedding website called <i>The Knot</i>. I am getting married this year, but we created our wedding page through a different website entirely, so my interest was piqued. When I clicked on it, I found it wasn’t our entire wedding site, but rather just our Target wedding registry with our names and our wedding date. I tried to find information on Target’s Terms and Conditions page about any sort of information sharing with <i>The Knot</i> but found nothing. As a result, I was left wondering when I unknowingly signed off on Target sharing that information with them. While our official wedding website did show up on the first-page search as well, it was well below this link. Information I want to share was less accessible than something I didn’t even know I had shared.</p>
 
<p>Accurately, the first page of results displayed my EECS 183 website profile (the class for which I am on staff here at the University), and possibly less accurately was a “Professor” profile on Coursicle. And this was all just with my first and last name!</p>
 
===Query: 'Emma Anne Muth' ===
 
<p>When I add my middle name, my address is one of the first results. It’s ironic to admit that I was hesitant to admit this in a semi-public forum when clearly the information is easily accessible. The second link is the first accurate social media link—a prize drawing on Facebook that I won from a dentist in my hometown.</p>
 
<p>Since my Facebook name has my middle name, I thought I’d be easier to find, but instead this provision of more information actually limits the search if you don’t have that additional piece of data. Searching “Emma Muth Facebook” brought up nothing, and even once I searched “Emma Anne Muth Facebook,” only several obscure posts came up—a comment I had tagged a coworker in about a cat adoption day, a review I wrote for a friend’s small business, and interestingly enough, a clustrmaps.com result about my mom (that same website got my address right but my birthday wrong). So, although I was happy to see that my Facebook was fairly secure from prying eyes, I was perturbed that my mom came up in a search about my Facebook page with no clear information on how this connection was made.</p>
 
===Incognito vs. Non-Incognito? ===
 
<p>I searched both queries (with and without middle name) in Incognito Mode as well as Non-Incognito Mode. Surprisingly, I could find no marked difference between the results, which left me wondering if Incognito Mode isn’t as incognito as I thought or if perhaps the results were somehow not impacted by my prior browsing history.</p>
 
==My Data Brokered Identity ==
 
[[File:InstantCheckmateWarning.png|350px|thumbnail|right|Fair warning or scare tactic?]]
 
<p>When I consulted data brokers, going as far as possible without having to pay, I felt dirty somehow. The supposedly glowing reviews, ranging from “I found out my husband was a cheater!” to “I reconnected with my long-lost sister!” were peppered with warnings and sensationalized pop-ups.</p>
 
<p>I admit the dramatized warnings made me laugh—as if I was going to unearth world-shattering revelations about myself—but simultaneously I wondered how many people had found truth or been led astray by the results here. For example, it listed multiple cities and alternate names for me, but only one in each category was correct. If it couldn’t even guarantee my nicknames were correct, what if someone believed all its claims about my dating profiles (which don’t exist) or arrest record (also nonexistent)?</p>
 
<p>Another data broker claimed a phone number my family had not used in at least a decade was first reported in 2019 and connected to me. Naturally, I started thinking—when did I put that phone number out there? How did they get it, but not until 2019?</p>
 
 
==Conclusion ==
 
==Conclusion ==
 
<p>I am fairly happy with my online presence. Most of what I found was accurate, and even if it wasn't, the inaccuracies weren’t damaging. I don't foresee an incorrect Coursicle profile hurting me in the future. But I know that not everyone is that lucky— how many actions are immortalized on the Internet? As we grow and change, <b>is it ethical that we have no say in resetting or erasing portions of our digital footprint?</b> Even if we could, what implications would that have? My very first result is a necessity for job searching, but it also reveals quite a bit about the past five years of my life. Can you have the necessities without compromising privacy?</p>
 
<p>I am fairly happy with my online presence. Most of what I found was accurate, and even if it wasn't, the inaccuracies weren’t damaging. I don't foresee an incorrect Coursicle profile hurting me in the future. But I know that not everyone is that lucky— how many actions are immortalized on the Internet? As we grow and change, <b>is it ethical that we have no say in resetting or erasing portions of our digital footprint?</b> Even if we could, what implications would that have? My very first result is a necessity for job searching, but it also reveals quite a bit about the past five years of my life. Can you have the necessities without compromising privacy?</p>
<p>I’m glad I did this before my wedding this fall because I can’t help but wonder how the stability of this information will shift after my last name changes. How long will it take them to catch up with me? How long until they associate my new last name with my “old” identity? I doubt I can escape the Internet; indeed, as the world becomes more technologized, <b>I doubt anyone can</b>.</p>
+
<p>I’m glad I did this before my wedding this fall because I can’t help but wonder how the stability of this information will shift after my last name changes. How long will it take them to catch up with me? How long until they associate my new last name with my “old” identity? I doubt I can escape the Internet; indeed, as the world becomes more technologized, <b>I doubt anyone can</b>.</p> most diff part ofthis was putting myself in someone else's shoes
  
 
== References ==
 
== References ==

Revision as of 01:50, 5 March 2021

Though I have, like most people, searched myself on the Internet before, I have never approached it asking, “Who does the Internet say I am?” As I began this assignment, I was curious— I have heard many people mention their high school athletics records, club-related activities, or other high-school-related results, and as someone who was homeschooled from preschool until high school graduation, I knew that would not be the case for me. In fact, I was fairly confident I would be happy with my online footprint and the privacy I'd achieved. Regardless, I set out, with only my name in my virtual hand, to see what I could find. While I did find confirmation that I have locked down my personal information fairly successfully, I left with more questions about information "leakage" and questions about the ethical implications of these leaks and their accuracy (or lack thereof).

A Restricted Perspective

At a young age, I learned to be protective of my online identity. When my parents helped me create my first Facebook page on my thirteenth birthday (and not a day sooner), they guided me through keeping it as private as possible and warned me against accepting friend requests from strangers. It is funny how these things from childhood persist— to this day, I always feel a little unsettled if one of my social media accounts is set to public. As an artifact of this, according to my Internet searches, I virtually didn’t exist until I graduated from community college, which is the earliest photo I can find of myself by searching my name (first + last as well as first + middle + last).

The earliest Internet photo of myself that I can find (May 2018)
Even my decade-old Facebook profile does not directly come up in any searches, though a rogue post—a prize drawing on Facebook that I won from a dentist in my hometown—and comment—me tagging a coworker in about a cat adoption day—did appear at some point. Even the twenty-word bio on my private Instagram, admittedly the most personal information able to be found, paints a fairly generic picture of a senior in college who is majoring in computer science, works at a library, is a Christian, and is either engaged or married as of last July (it isn’t clear from my bio alone). As I tried to read this imagining I was a stranger, it felt like peering in through a window— what you see isn't wrong, but there's a lot missing. You wouldn't know I have three sisters, that my best friend lives in Alaska, that this May will be six years since my aunt died. I've been shaped by these elements of life, but you'd never know that by just peering through the window.

The Jackpot of LinkedIn

Offering a more detailed perspective is LinkedIn, the very first result you get when you search my name. Kudos to Google, it is also the most accurate and detailed search result on page 1, rising above the LinkedIn profile of an Emma Muth in Nevada and an Emma Muth from the 1940 census. Without even clicking on the link, it immediately tells the casual online wanderer or curious classmate that I work (and presumably go to school) at the University of Michigan. Once you click on the link, you can see a treasure trove of details— work, school, and volunteer history that essentially give away where I live (one of the reasons I was hesitant to create a LinkedIn in the first place) and where I've been professionally and educationally for the past six years. While this is the most extensive record of existence I could find, the perspective in many ways is just as limited as my twenty-word Instagram bio. You know that I attend the University of Michigan and have been involved in a few different roles as a student instructor, but what isn't clear is my passion for teaching. It's clear that I've worked as a library clerk for about four years, but no one would know I've actually worked at the library in total for nine years

Information "Leaks"

However, despite my generally locked down identity, unexpected information showed me that information “leaks” may be more common than I realized. The result that surprised me the most was the one with my name on a wedding website called The Knot. I am getting married this year, but we created our wedding page through a different website entirely, so my interest was piqued. When I clicked on it, I found it wasn’t our entire wedding site, but rather just our Target wedding registry with our names and our wedding date. I tried to find information on Target’s Terms and Conditions page about any sort of information sharing with The Knot but found nothing. As a result, I was left wondering when I unknowingly signed off on Target sharing that information with them. While our official wedding website did show up on the first-page search as well, it was well below this link. Information I wanted and intended to share was less accessible than something I didn’t even know I had shared. We’ve talked in class about the obfuscation of information usage introduced by many Terms and Conditions documents and the question of where the responsibility falls—on the user to read the full disclosure of how their information is being used or on the distributors of the technology to make it more easily consumable. While this is a question outside of the scope of this exposition, I believe the practicality of sifting through and deciphering these types of documents should be questioned. If I had a “snapshot” of how my wedding website would use my information, perhaps my perception of this information leak would have changed.

Am I In Control?

Information obtained from Data Brokers made me consider the difference between information leaks and downright inaccurate information; the ethical implications of differentiation are big. When I consulted data brokers, going as far as possible without having to pay, I felt dirty somehow. The supposedly glowing reviews, ranging from “I found out my husband was a cheater!” to “I reconnected with my long-lost sister!” were peppered with warnings and sensationalized pop-ups. I admit the dramatized warnings made me laugh—as if I was going to unearth world-shattering revelations about myself—but simultaneously I wondered how many people had found truth or been led astray by the results here. For example, it listed multiple cities and alternate names for me, but only one in each category was correct. If it couldn’t even guarantee my nicknames were correct, what if someone believed all its claims about my dating profiles (which don’t exist) or arrest record (also nonexistent)? Another data broker claimed a phone number my family had not used in at least a decade was first reported in 2019 and connected to me. Naturally, I started thinking—when did I put that phone number out there? How did they get it, but not until 2019? – THOUGH some of the incorrect information may prevail, many of these sites have methods to request removal – we aren’t powerless (yet). But as they note (https://www.instantcheckmate.com/opt-out/), you aren’t scrubbing your identity from the internet – just people getting it through their search. They claim all their information comes from public records. If people try hard enough they can find it.

Conclusion

I am fairly happy with my online presence. Most of what I found was accurate, and even if it wasn't, the inaccuracies weren’t damaging. I don't foresee an incorrect Coursicle profile hurting me in the future. But I know that not everyone is that lucky— how many actions are immortalized on the Internet? As we grow and change, is it ethical that we have no say in resetting or erasing portions of our digital footprint? Even if we could, what implications would that have? My very first result is a necessity for job searching, but it also reveals quite a bit about the past five years of my life. Can you have the necessities without compromising privacy?

I’m glad I did this before my wedding this fall because I can’t help but wonder how the stability of this information will shift after my last name changes. How long will it take them to catch up with me? How long until they associate my new last name with my “old” identity? I doubt I can escape the Internet; indeed, as the world becomes more technologized, I doubt anyone can.

most diff part ofthis was putting myself in someone else's shoes

References