Difference between revisions of "Device implant"

From SI410
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
A device implant, or microchip, is a small technological device embedded under the skin.  In humans, these often are types of integrated circuit devices or RFID transponders (radio frequency identifications). <ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microchip_implant_(human)</ref>  Each microchip contains a unique individual identification (ID) number.  Law Enforcement officials, healthcare providers, security personnel, and private individuals us device implants to hold identification and contact information.  
+
A device implant, or microchip, is a small technological device embedded under the skin.  In humans, these often are types of integrated circuit devices or RFID transponders (radio frequency identifications). <ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microchip_implant_(human)</ref>  Each microchip contains a unique individual identification (ID) number.  Law enforcement officials, healthcare providers, security personnel, and private individuals use device implants to hold identification and contact information.  
  
 
[[File:xray.jpg|thumbnail|right|X-ray showing implanted RFID devices, courtesy www.vox.com.]]
 
[[File:xray.jpg|thumbnail|right|X-ray showing implanted RFID devices, courtesy www.vox.com.]]
  
Usually cylindrical, current devices are approximately the size of a grain of rice, and the most common implant location is between the thumb and forefinger.  Human implants are contained in a glass case, which is not indestructible, but is hygienic for sub-dermal implanting. <ref name="Arts">https://arstechnica.com/features/2018/01/a-practical-guide-to-microchip-implants/</ref>
+
Current devices are usually cylindrical and approximately the size of a grain of rice.  The most common implant location is between the thumb and forefinger.  Human implants, compared to microchips in animals, are contained in a glass case, which is not indestructible, but is hygienic for sub-dermal implanting. <ref name="Arts">https://arstechnica.com/features/2018/01/a-practical-guide-to-microchip-implants/</ref>
Most implants rely on RFID technology, and some, more recently, also qualify as near-field communication (NFC) chips, a type of high-frequency radio waves.  They do not require charging or battery power, and so only function through their small antenna over radio wave sensing.  <ref name="Arts"/>
+
Most implants rely on RFID technology, and some, more recently, also qualify as near-field communication (NFC) chips, a type of high-frequency radio wave communication.  They do not require any charge or battery power, and so only function through radio wave sensing via a small antenna.  <ref name="Arts"/>
  
 
[[File:jo.jpg|thumbnail|right|Jowan Osterlund holds an implant, courtesy www.hd.se.]]  
 
[[File:jo.jpg|thumbnail|right|Jowan Osterlund holds an implant, courtesy www.hd.se.]]  
Line 10: Line 10:
 
== History ==
 
== History ==
  
The first known case of a human receiving and having been implanted with a microchip was British scientist Kevin Warwick, in 1998.  He became the first human to receive and test RFID surgery, and demonstrate the uses of a human microchip. <ref name="RG">https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280933310_RFIDs_Chip_Implants_and_their_related_Ethical_Issues </ref>
+
The first known case of a human receiving an implant or microchip was British scientist Kevin Warwick, in 1998.  He became the first human to test RFID surgery, and demonstrate the uses of a human microchip. <ref name="RG">https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280933310_RFIDs_Chip_Implants_and_their_related_Ethical_Issues </ref>
 
+
[[File:XXX|thumbnail|right|X-ray showing implanted RFID devices. ]]
+
  
 
== Current uses ==
 
== Current uses ==
  
Human device implant technology has proliferated over the years, and has become a way to access information, and to store ticket codes, passwords, and more, reducing the need to carry keys, IDs, or remember login information. <ref name="APF">https://www.scmp.com/news/world/europe/article/2145896/thousands-people-sweden-get-microchip-implants-new-way-life</ref>  It can be used to unlock cars, offices, or homes, or log on to technology devices or systems, such as phones or laptops. <ref name="Arts"/>  Implants that are NFC compatible can also store Bitcoin or other virtual wallet addresses, and in Sweden, can carry regional train tickets. <ref name="Arts"/>
+
Human device implant technology has proliferated over the years, and has become a way to access information, and to store ticket codes, passwords, and more, reducing the need to carry keys, IDs, or remember login information. <ref name="APF">https://www.scmp.com/news/world/europe/article/2145896/thousands-people-sweden-get-microchip-implants-new-way-life</ref>  It can be used to unlock cars, offices, or homes, or log on to technological devices or systems, such as phones or laptops. <ref name="Arts"/>  Implants that are NFC compatible can also store Bitcoin or other virtual wallet addresses, and in Sweden, can carry regional train tickets. <ref name="Arts"/>
  
 
Jowan Osterlund started the firm Biohax International, after a career as a professional body piercer.  He says, "Having different cards and tokens verifying your identity to a bunch of different systems just doesn't make sense… Using a chip means that the hyper-connected surroundings that you live in every day can be streamlined." <ref>https://www.npr.org/2018/10/22/658808705/thousands-of-swedes-are-inserting-microchips-under-their-skin</ref><br />
 
Jowan Osterlund started the firm Biohax International, after a career as a professional body piercer.  He says, "Having different cards and tokens verifying your identity to a bunch of different systems just doesn't make sense… Using a chip means that the hyper-connected surroundings that you live in every day can be streamlined." <ref>https://www.npr.org/2018/10/22/658808705/thousands-of-swedes-are-inserting-microchips-under-their-skin</ref><br />
Line 25: Line 23:
  
 
==== Healthcare ====
 
==== Healthcare ====
Device implants have also been used in healthcare.  Firms such as Three Square Market have begun seeking markets for GPS tracking chips for patients with mental health disabilities, such as Alzheimer’s or Dementia, and some chips have been developed to monitor vital health signs, or hold medical records or medication lists. <ref name="WP"/> <ref name="HITN">https://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/human-implantable-rfid-chips-some-ethical-and-privacy-concerns</ref>
 
  
==== Security ====
+
The healthcare industry has begun utilizing device implants for patient monitoring.  Firms such as Three Square Market have begun seeking markets for GPS tracking chips for patients with mental health disabilities, such as Alzheimer’s or Dementia, and some chips have been developed to monitor vital health signs, or hold patient's personal medical records or medication lists. <ref name="WP"/> <ref name="HITN">https://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/human-implantable-rfid-chips-some-ethical-and-privacy-concerns</ref>
Amal Graafstra has begun developing an implant-activated ‘smart gun’ which can only be fired by the person with the matching implant ID, with the idea that this would make firearms more secure, and limit them to a single user. <ref>https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/pgkz8y/biohacking-smart-guns-RFID-implants-amal-graafstra </ref>
+
  
==== Popular culture depictions ====
+
==== Firearm regulation ====
In the movie ''Upgrade'' which was released in 2018, the main focus is device implants. Not only do the characters have guns implanted in their arms, some even have a device that connects to their brain stem and can take over their bodily functions. However, the movie brings up a pressing ethical question that will need to be addressed before something like this makes it way into the modern day world. In the movie, one of the devices becomes so smart that it instructs its user on how to hack itself, giving the device full control over their operator without a need for consent. With these implanted devices, future engineers will need to find a way to build trust with their device's operators in order to ensure that a worst case scenario, like the one in Upgrade, does not happen.
+
 
 +
Amal Graafstra has begun developing an implant-activated ‘smart gun’ which can only be fired by the person with the matching implant ID, with the idea that this would make firearms more secure, by limiting them to a single user. <ref>https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/pgkz8y/biohacking-smart-guns-RFID-implants-amal-graafstra </ref>
 +
 
 +
==== Popular culture depiction ====
 +
 
 +
The 2018 movie ''Upgrade'' focuses on certain styles of human device implants. The movie's characters have guns implanted in their arms, and some even have an implanted device that connects to their brain stem, able to control their bodily functions. In the movie, one of the devices becomes so smart that it instructs his user on how to hack himself, giving the device full control over their operator, without any need for consent or control.  The movie raises a pressing ethical question that will need to be addressed before a similar situation makes its way into the modern day world. With these type of implants, future engineers will need to find a way to build in trust and human override or control, in order to ensure that a scenario, such as the one in ''Upgrade'', does not happen.
  
 
== Ethical considerations ==
 
== Ethical considerations ==
  
While there is some concern for infection after implantation, and typically swelling or slight discomfort are expected after insertion, most companies work with experienced body piercers.  So the debate has largely been around the ethical complexity of the devices. <ref name="Arts"/>
+
While there is some concern for infection after implantation, and swelling or slight discomfort are typically expected after insertion, most companies work with experienced body piercers to reduce health risk.  So, the debate with human device implants has largely been around the ethical complexity of using them. <ref name="Arts"/>
  
 
==== Data protection ====
 
==== Data protection ====
Line 41: Line 42:
 
The Agence France-Presse reported in May 2018: “Swedes have gone on to be very active in microchipping, with scant debate about issues surrounding its use, in a country keen on new technology and where the sharing of personal information is held up as a sign of a transparent society… Sweden has a track record on the sharing of personal information, which may have helped ease the microchip’s acceptance among the Nordic country’s 10 million-strong population.” <ref name="APF"/>  A local pioneer in human implants, Jowan Osterlund has stated that he believes “that if we carried all our personal data on us, we would have better control of their use.” <ref name="APF"/>
 
The Agence France-Presse reported in May 2018: “Swedes have gone on to be very active in microchipping, with scant debate about issues surrounding its use, in a country keen on new technology and where the sharing of personal information is held up as a sign of a transparent society… Sweden has a track record on the sharing of personal information, which may have helped ease the microchip’s acceptance among the Nordic country’s 10 million-strong population.” <ref name="APF"/>  A local pioneer in human implants, Jowan Osterlund has stated that he believes “that if we carried all our personal data on us, we would have better control of their use.” <ref name="APF"/>
  
However, this localized collection of data is what concerns some.  Ben Libberton is a microbiologist at MAX IV Laboratory.  He has summarized the greatest risk as having to do with the data collected on and by the chip.  “At the moment, the data collected and shared by implants is small, but it’s likely that this will increase.” <ref name="APF"/>  He points to the looming question of collecting the data and decide how to stare, handle ,and destroy it. <ref name="APF"/>  “The more data is stored in a single place as could happen with a chip, the more risk it could be used against us.” <ref name="APF"/>
+
However, this localized collection of data is what concerns some.  Ben Libberton is a microbiologist at MAX IV Laboratory.  He has summarized the greatest risk as having to do with the data collected on and by the chip.  “At the moment, the data collected and shared by implants is small, but it’s likely that this will increase.” <ref name="APF"/>  He points to the looming question of collecting the data and deciding how to share, handle, or destroy it. <ref name="APF"/>  “The more data is stored in a single place as could happen with a chip, the more risk it could be used against us.” <ref name="APF"/>
 
+
Some, including John Halamka, MD, also point out that patients would need to give consent for implantation before one could be implemented, and that the progression of mental disease such as Alzheimer’s can make the timeline for this difficult to manage. <ref name="HITN"/>  In time, the sharing and storage of medical health records, location history, or access codes presents opportunities for companies to exploit customer data.  The American Medical Association has for about 10 years regulated the ethics of RFID implants, and has sought to protect consumer health data. <ref name="RG"/>  Many fear that the data collected from these devices could be collected and aggregated, and then lost or shared without the owner’s consent.  Similarly, there is a fear that the devices might be forced upon a certain group for surveillance, compromising their freedom and privacy. <ref name="RG"/>
+
  
 
The chips can also be compromised, as explained by Tarah Wheeler, an information security researcher.  Some of the technology can be cloned, allowing access to those who are not the owners of a chip and the ID data stored on it. <ref name="Arts"/>
 
The chips can also be compromised, as explained by Tarah Wheeler, an information security researcher.  Some of the technology can be cloned, allowing access to those who are not the owners of a chip and the ID data stored on it. <ref name="Arts"/>
 +
 +
==== Consent and monitoring ====
 +
 +
Some, including John Halamka, MD, also point out that patients would need to give consent for implantation before receiving a device, and that the progression of mental disease such as Alzheimer’s can make the timeline for this difficult to manage. <ref name="HITN"/>  In time, the sharing and storage of medical health records, location history, or access codes presents opportunities for companies or other bodies to exploit customer data.
 +
 +
The American Medical Association has regulated the ethics of RFID implants for about 10 years, and has sought to protect consumer health data. <ref name="RG"/>  Many fear that the data collected from these devices could be collected and aggregated, and then lost or shared without the owner’s consent.  Similarly, there is a fear that the devices might be forced upon a certain group for surveillance, compromising their freedom and privacy. <ref name="RG"/>
  
 
In the future, ethical issues such as tracking employees, or preferential hiring to those who agree to a chip, might arise. <ref>https://www.digitalethics.org/essays/implanting-microchips-sign-progress-or-mark-beast  
 
In the future, ethical issues such as tracking employees, or preferential hiring to those who agree to a chip, might arise. <ref>https://www.digitalethics.org/essays/implanting-microchips-sign-progress-or-mark-beast  
</ref>  Others argue that while right now models of microchips sees less risky, the issue will quickly become a slippery slope.
+
</ref>  Others argue that while right now models of microchips sees less risky, the issue is quickly becoming a slippery slope.
  
 
== References ==
 
== References ==
 
[[Category:2019New]]
 
[[Category:2019New]]
 
[[Category:Hardware]]
 
[[Category:Hardware]]

Revision as of 17:54, 29 March 2019

A device implant, or microchip, is a small technological device embedded under the skin. In humans, these often are types of integrated circuit devices or RFID transponders (radio frequency identifications). [1] Each microchip contains a unique individual identification (ID) number. Law enforcement officials, healthcare providers, security personnel, and private individuals use device implants to hold identification and contact information.

X-ray showing implanted RFID devices, courtesy www.vox.com.

Current devices are usually cylindrical and approximately the size of a grain of rice. The most common implant location is between the thumb and forefinger. Human implants, compared to microchips in animals, are contained in a glass case, which is not indestructible, but is hygienic for sub-dermal implanting. [2] Most implants rely on RFID technology, and some, more recently, also qualify as near-field communication (NFC) chips, a type of high-frequency radio wave communication. They do not require any charge or battery power, and so only function through radio wave sensing via a small antenna. [2]

Jowan Osterlund holds an implant, courtesy www.hd.se.

History

The first known case of a human receiving an implant or microchip was British scientist Kevin Warwick, in 1998. He became the first human to test RFID surgery, and demonstrate the uses of a human microchip. [3]

Current uses

Human device implant technology has proliferated over the years, and has become a way to access information, and to store ticket codes, passwords, and more, reducing the need to carry keys, IDs, or remember login information. [4] It can be used to unlock cars, offices, or homes, or log on to technological devices or systems, such as phones or laptops. [2] Implants that are NFC compatible can also store Bitcoin or other virtual wallet addresses, and in Sweden, can carry regional train tickets. [2]

Jowan Osterlund started the firm Biohax International, after a career as a professional body piercer. He says, "Having different cards and tokens verifying your identity to a bunch of different systems just doesn't make sense… Using a chip means that the hyper-connected surroundings that you live in every day can be streamlined." [5]

In recent years, the company Dangerous Things has become a leading producer and proponent of human device implants. [6] They suggest anywhere from 50,000 to 100,000 people worldwide have implants now. [2]

In 2017, the Wisconsin company Three Square Market made headlines after offering free microchipping to their employees. In August 2018, it was announced that they were seeking to upgrade the initially simplistic devices to more powerful ones, which would eventually include GPS tracking and voice activation. [7]

Healthcare

The healthcare industry has begun utilizing device implants for patient monitoring. Firms such as Three Square Market have begun seeking markets for GPS tracking chips for patients with mental health disabilities, such as Alzheimer’s or Dementia, and some chips have been developed to monitor vital health signs, or hold patient's personal medical records or medication lists. [7] [8]

Firearm regulation

Amal Graafstra has begun developing an implant-activated ‘smart gun’ which can only be fired by the person with the matching implant ID, with the idea that this would make firearms more secure, by limiting them to a single user. [9]

Popular culture depiction

The 2018 movie Upgrade focuses on certain styles of human device implants. The movie's characters have guns implanted in their arms, and some even have an implanted device that connects to their brain stem, able to control their bodily functions. In the movie, one of the devices becomes so smart that it instructs his user on how to hack himself, giving the device full control over their operator, without any need for consent or control. The movie raises a pressing ethical question that will need to be addressed before a similar situation makes its way into the modern day world. With these type of implants, future engineers will need to find a way to build in trust and human override or control, in order to ensure that a scenario, such as the one in Upgrade, does not happen.

Ethical considerations

While there is some concern for infection after implantation, and swelling or slight discomfort are typically expected after insertion, most companies work with experienced body piercers to reduce health risk. So, the debate with human device implants has largely been around the ethical complexity of using them. [2]

Data protection

The Agence France-Presse reported in May 2018: “Swedes have gone on to be very active in microchipping, with scant debate about issues surrounding its use, in a country keen on new technology and where the sharing of personal information is held up as a sign of a transparent society… Sweden has a track record on the sharing of personal information, which may have helped ease the microchip’s acceptance among the Nordic country’s 10 million-strong population.” [4] A local pioneer in human implants, Jowan Osterlund has stated that he believes “that if we carried all our personal data on us, we would have better control of their use.” [4]

However, this localized collection of data is what concerns some. Ben Libberton is a microbiologist at MAX IV Laboratory. He has summarized the greatest risk as having to do with the data collected on and by the chip. “At the moment, the data collected and shared by implants is small, but it’s likely that this will increase.” [4] He points to the looming question of collecting the data and deciding how to share, handle, or destroy it. [4] “The more data is stored in a single place as could happen with a chip, the more risk it could be used against us.” [4]

The chips can also be compromised, as explained by Tarah Wheeler, an information security researcher. Some of the technology can be cloned, allowing access to those who are not the owners of a chip and the ID data stored on it. [2]

Consent and monitoring

Some, including John Halamka, MD, also point out that patients would need to give consent for implantation before receiving a device, and that the progression of mental disease such as Alzheimer’s can make the timeline for this difficult to manage. [8] In time, the sharing and storage of medical health records, location history, or access codes presents opportunities for companies or other bodies to exploit customer data.

The American Medical Association has regulated the ethics of RFID implants for about 10 years, and has sought to protect consumer health data. [3] Many fear that the data collected from these devices could be collected and aggregated, and then lost or shared without the owner’s consent. Similarly, there is a fear that the devices might be forced upon a certain group for surveillance, compromising their freedom and privacy. [3]

In the future, ethical issues such as tracking employees, or preferential hiring to those who agree to a chip, might arise. [10] Others argue that while right now models of microchips sees less risky, the issue is quickly becoming a slippery slope.

References

  1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microchip_implant_(human)
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 https://arstechnica.com/features/2018/01/a-practical-guide-to-microchip-implants/
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280933310_RFIDs_Chip_Implants_and_their_related_Ethical_Issues
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 https://www.scmp.com/news/world/europe/article/2145896/thousands-people-sweden-get-microchip-implants-new-way-life
  5. https://www.npr.org/2018/10/22/658808705/thousands-of-swedes-are-inserting-microchips-under-their-skin
  6. https://www.dangerousthings.com/biohacking
  7. 7.0 7.1 https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2018/08/23/this-firm-already-microchips-employees-could-your-ailing-relative-be-next/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.5367229835b5
  8. 8.0 8.1 https://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/human-implantable-rfid-chips-some-ethical-and-privacy-concerns
  9. https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/pgkz8y/biohacking-smart-guns-RFID-implants-amal-graafstra
  10. https://www.digitalethics.org/essays/implanting-microchips-sign-progress-or-mark-beast