Difference between revisions of "Cooper Stevens"

From SI410
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Conclusion)
m (Conclusion)
 
(80 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==A Short Introduction==
+
[[File:''Cooper Stevens'' Google Search Results - Notations.png|300px|thumb|right|The first page of search results. Those relevant to me are circled.]]
I am tasked with going incognito and gathering all the information on someone of particular interest. I don't have anything on this person except a name: "Cooper Stevens."
+
In the interest of gaining recognition from potential employers and recruiters, he has spent a good deal of time in the last few years curating information sources about himself, and deliberately publishing them publicly on the internet. In my investigation to find information about him, I was especially contented to easily find those sources that he had curated (meaning that recruiters could also find them easily). However, upon digging further into the internet's search results, I found some remains left behind from his digital footprint (that is, information that he did not curate and publish, but rather information gathered on him just by merely having an active presence on the internet).
+
  
Through this investigation, we will see that the information he provided in these publications makes up his entire online identity while the information from his digital footprint will work solely to verify this identity as authentic. This observation paired with the fact that he keeps these publications up-to-date with his personal information will allow us to conclude that his online identity is accurate, authentic, and stable.
+
==Preface==
 +
In the interests of grabbing the attention of potential employers and recruiters, I have spent a good deal of time in the last few years curating personal information into websites and profiles which I have deliberately published publicly on the internet. In my investigation to find information about myself, I was contented to easily find these websites and profiles. However, upon digging further into the search results, I found some remains left behind from my digital footprint (that is, information that I did ''not'' curate and publish, but rather resulted from my mere existence in this digital world).
  
==Googling Myself==
+
Through this investigation, we will see that the information I deliberately provided in these publications makes up my entire online identity, while my digital footprint functions as a verifier of this identity's authenticity. This observation paired with the fact that I keep these publications up-to-date will allow us to conclude that my online identity is accurate, verifiably authentic, and stable.
[[File:''Cooper Stevens'' Google Search Results - Notations.png|300px|thumb|right]]
+
  
===My deliberate online identity===
+
Generalizing from this, we will reason that ''anyone'' can create their online identity to be whatever they desire, and such a concern will force us to consider strategies for detecting those who do so with malintent.
  
When I search my name "Cooper Stevens" on [https://www.google.com/ Google], the sources about me that come up on the first page of results are [https://www.facebook.com/cooper.stevens.376 my Facebook], [https://www.linkedin.com/in/cooper-stevens-6ba88a19a my LinkedIn], and [https://www.ncsasports.org/mens-tennis-recruiting/michigan/clinton-township/international-academy-of-macomb/cooper-stevens1 my Next College Student Athlete (NCSA) profile]. To my delight, these are three of the four profiles that I have taken the time to curate and publish for all the internet to see!
+
==My Deliberate Online Identity==
  
My Facebook and LinkedIn profiles make public information about my age, education, work history, homes and cities I have lived in, and a few photos of me. Since I regularly update my information on these sites, this data is clearly accurate, authentic, and stable. This is not all of the information these sites provide, however. On both of these sites, I have posted a link to [https://coopstev.wixsite.com/mportfolio my portfolio website].
+
When I search "Cooper Stevens" on [https://www.google.com/ Google], the sources about me that are on the first page of results are [https://www.facebook.com/cooper.stevens.376 my Facebook], [https://www.linkedin.com/in/cooper-stevens-6ba88a19a my LinkedIn], and [https://www.ncsasports.org/mens-tennis-recruiting/michigan/clinton-township/international-academy-of-macomb/cooper-stevens1 my Next College Student Athlete (NCSA) profile]. To my delight, these are three of the four profiles that I have taken the time to curate and publish!
  
My public portfolio website contains a lot more personal information about me, ranging from my significant other to my hobbies, to favorite vacations, to my academic research. This is by design so that I can easily refer potential employers to this website so that they may better get to know me as a person (as opposed to just as a candidate). This website also contains my professional contact information and a lot more pictures of me. Since I regularly update my information on my portfolio website, this data is clearly accurate, authentic, and stable.
+
My Facebook and LinkedIn profiles inform on my age, education, work history, residences, and a few photos of me. But this is not all of the information these sites provide: both of these sites contain a link to [https://coopstev.wixsite.com/mportfolio my portfolio website].
  
The next website that comes up in a Google search is my NCSA profile for tennis. This was a profile that I had set up during high school so that college recruiters could more easily find me and get in contact. It provides a different type of personal information, including my height, weight, my Universal Tennis Rating, and the position I played in high school. However, this information is out-of-date as these stats have changed over the last two years. Frankly, I had forgotten I made this profile. Perhaps this information is due to be updated (or deleted, as I no longer have a use for this recruitment profile).
+
My public portfolio website contains much more personal information, ranging from my significant other to hobbies and academic research. As such, it is very reflective of my personality. This is by design so that I can easily refer potential employers to this website so that they may better get to know me as a person (as opposed to just as a candidate).
  
===My online identity as a result of my digital footprint===
+
The next website that comes up is my NCSA profile for tennis. I set this up during high school so that college recruiters could easily find and contact me. I have not worked to keep this profile up-to-date because there has been no reason to, yet all of the information is still surprisingly accurate today.
Despite the extreme ease of access of most everything one might reasonably look to find out about me all being in one place on my portfolio website, there still remained a few bits and pieces of data about me scattered throughout the internet. All of these sites that I will discuss (besides Facebook) were found on pages on or after the fifth page of search results! Needless to say, these were not so easy to find, especially when compared to my four curated profiles which could all be found with the first page of search results.
+
  
====Nothing but a name====
+
Since all of these websites and profiles contain information that is always up-to-date (either because the data hasn't changed or because I am always updating it), it follows that the data I have deliberately made public on these sites is accurate, authentic, and stable.
  
[[File:Facebook favorites.png|250px|thumb|right]]
+
But since I am the one that published these, we must consider the possibility that I am lying for some benefit. Can we verify my deliberate identity's authenticity?
  
The first part of my digital footprint that I found was located at the bottom of my Facebook profile. Here, Facebook makes claims about my "favorite" things which are by-no-means correct. While one these "favorites" (in particular, [https://www.facebook.com/wlnperformingarts/ WLN Performing Arts]) could be construed as important to my online identity, it is nonetheless nonsensical since it has no correlation to anything else published about myself (I did not attend WLN high school, as said in my online portfolio).
+
==My Digital Footprint Verifies My Deliberate Identity==
 +
[[File:Facebook favorites-small.png|300px|thumb|right|My favorite things, according to Facebook.]]
 +
Apart from the information discussed above, there remains data about me scattered throughout the internet. All of these sites that I will discuss (besides Facebook) were found on pages on or after the fifth page of search results! Needless to say, these were not easy to find, especially when compared to my four curated profiles which could all be found within the first page of search results. In exploring these results, we will find that almost every piece of my digital footprint verifies that which I present in my deliberate identity.
  
[[File:Quora-public-info.png|300px|thumb|right]]
+
===Continuing Our Search for "Cooper Stevens"===
 +
The first instance of my digital footprint I found was located at the bottom of my Facebook profile. Here, Facebook displays my "favorite" things which are by-no-means my favorite. As such, these "favorites" fail to verify my deliberate identity. Note, however, that they do not contradict my deliberate identity either.
  
The next piece of my digital footprint that I stumbled upon was [https://www.quora.com/profile/Cooper-Stevens-2 my Quora account] that I have not used in a year or two. Here, a part of my Quora account that is publicly available is a list of my subject interests. I figured Quora would keep these private and use them only to provide better content suggestions - not make them public. While this discovery was surprising, it was not concerning as I had already chosen to express my passions for these topics in my online portfolio.
+
[[File:Quora-public-info.png|300px|thumb|right|A list of my qualifications and subject interests, publicly available on my Quora account.]]
  
Digging deeper into the pages of search results, I was delighted to see that data brokers had very little information that would inform my online identity. The information they had was restricted to a list of my family members and neighbors, and two email addresses (one of which was not even mine). The only correct information I found to be behind a paywall was a personal email address. Still, though, this information about my email, family, and neighbors is ineffectual in trying to get to know me as a person, and hence does not inform my online identity.
+
The next piece of my digital footprint that I stumbled upon was [https://www.quora.com/profile/Cooper-Stevens-2 my dormant Quora account]. Part of my Quora account that is publicly available is a list of my subject interests. While the discovery that these were not private was surprising, it was not concerning as I had already chosen to express my passions for these topics in my online portfolio. Hence, my Quora profile can be used as verification of my deliberate identity.
  
====Honing in====
+
Digging deeper into the search results, I was delighted to see that data brokers had very little information that could inform my online identity. The information they had was restricted to a list of my family members<ref>Persopo. (2020). [https://persopo.com/search-results/s:MI-n:Cooper-Stevens/d02f53ea-1613522937 ''Cooper Stevens'']. Persopo. Retrieved February 18, 2021.</ref> and neighbors<ref>Michigan Residents Database. (2019). [https://www.michiganresidentdatabase.com/person/159337582/cooper-stevens#overview ''Cooper Dean Stevens'']. Michigan Residents Database. Retrieved February 18, 2021.</ref>, and two email addresses (one of which is not even mine)<ref>instantcheckmate. (2021). [https://www.instantcheckmate.com/people/cooper-stevens/ ''Found: Cooper Stevens'']. instantcheckmate. Retrieved February 18, 2021. </ref>. The only correct information I found to be behind a paywall was a personal email address. Still, though, this information about my email and neighbors is ineffectual in trying to get to know me as a person, and hence does not inform my online identity. Meanwhile, the information about my family had already been provided in my online portfolio, further verifying my deliberate identity.
  
Since I was able to figure out the education history of "Cooper Stevens" by only searching the name, I then was able to make my search more specific by adding schools that Cooper Stevens has attended to the search query.
+
After exhausting the results for "Cooper Stevens", I wanted to continue my search! Since I was able to find my education history by only searching my name, I thought it reasonable to make my search more specific by adding my schools to the query.
  
In this search query's first few pages of results, I only found a long history of my performance in athletic competitions. These included [https://www.athletic.net/Crosscountry/TeamRecords.aspx?SchoolID=35609&Grade=7 cross-country results from middle-school], tennis results from high school<ref>Macomb Daily Sports. (2016, August 26). [http://www.miprepzone.com/macomb/results.asp?ID=12614 ''ROUNDUP: Wins for Utica, Dakota, Cousino'']. MIPrepZone. Retrieved February 18, 2021.</ref><ref>Macomb Daily Sports. (2015, August 31). [http://www.miprepzone.com/macomb/results.asp?ID=10227 ''Summaries for Aug. 31, 2015'']. MIPrepZone. Retrieved February 18, 2021.</ref><ref>Macomb Daily Sports. (2015, August 24). [http://www.miprepzone.com/macomb/results.asp?ID=10156 ''TENNIS RESULTS 8/24'']. MIPrepZone. Retrieved February 18, 2021.</ref><ref>Vest, Mark. (2017, September 25). [https://www.candgnews.com/sports/chippewa-valley-boys-tennis-wins-mac-blue-dual-meet-championship-104314 ''Chippewa Valley boys tennis wins MAC Blue dual meet championship'']. C&G Newspapers. Retrieved February 18, 2021.</ref>, and [https://webstore.recsports.umich.edu/Bracket/GetBrackets?teamId=b9c32126-f485-4872-9fcc-fccb89f79592 Disc Golf results] at the University of Michigan. While this information is all correct, it can really only inform that I am an athletic person. Note, however, that I had already made this characteristic public on my online portfolio.
+
===Educational History===
 +
In this query, I found a long history of my performance in athletic competitions. These included [https://www.athletic.net/Crosscountry/TeamRecords.aspx?SchoolID=35609&Grade=7 cross-country results from middle-school], tennis results from high school<ref>Macomb Daily Sports. (2016, August 26). [http://www.miprepzone.com/macomb/results.asp?ID=12614 ''ROUNDUP: Wins for Utica, Dakota, Cousino'']. MIPrepZone. Retrieved February 18, 2021.</ref><ref>Macomb Daily Sports. (2015, August 31). [http://www.miprepzone.com/macomb/results.asp?ID=10227 ''Summaries for Aug. 31, 2015'']. MIPrepZone. Retrieved February 18, 2021.</ref><ref>Macomb Daily Sports. (2015, August 24). [http://www.miprepzone.com/macomb/results.asp?ID=10156 ''TENNIS RESULTS 8/24'']. MIPrepZone. Retrieved February 18, 2021.</ref><ref>Vest, Mark. (2017, September 25). [https://www.candgnews.com/sports/chippewa-valley-boys-tennis-wins-mac-blue-dual-meet-championship-104314 ''Chippewa Valley boys tennis wins MAC Blue dual meet championship'']. C&G Newspapers. Retrieved February 18, 2021.</ref>, and [https://webstore.recsports.umich.edu/Bracket/GetBrackets?teamId=b9c32126-f485-4872-9fcc-fccb89f79592 Disc Golf results] at the University of Michigan. While this information is all correct, it can really only inform that I am an athletic person. Note, however, that I had already made this characteristic public in my online portfolio.
  
The last few pieces of publicly available information that I found came directly from the University of Michigan. This information included my award of the 2020 William J. Branstrom Prize<ref>The University of Michigan. (2020, March 15). [https://honors.umich.edu/pdf/200189-HonorsConvocation.pdf "The University of Michigan's 97th Annual Honors Convocation"]. Ann Arbor; The University of Michigan. Page 114. Retrieved February 18, 2021.</ref>, and [https://instruct.math.lsa.umich.edu/mathlab/mathlabsched.html my current work schedule] at the University of Michigan’s Math Lab. On my online portfolio, I had already published that I received this award and worked at the Math Lab, so these discoveries would prove unhelpful in constructing my online identity.
+
The last few pieces of publicly available information that I found came directly from the University of Michigan. This information included my receipt of the 2020 William J. Branstrom Prize<ref>The University of Michigan. (2020, March 15). [https://honors.umich.edu/pdf/200189-HonorsConvocation.pdf "The University of Michigan's 97th Annual Honors Convocation"]. Ann Arbor; The University of Michigan. Page 114. Retrieved February 18, 2021.</ref>, and [https://instruct.math.lsa.umich.edu/mathlab/mathlabsched.html my current work schedule] at the University of Michigan’s Math Lab. In my online portfolio, I make public that I received this award and work at the Math Lab, so these discoveries further verify the authenticity of my deliberate identity.
  
 
==Conclusion==
 
==Conclusion==
As we have seen, there is a great variety of my personal information publicly available online as a result of my digital footprint. But we have also seen that this information was not only difficult to find (all sites were found on last few pages of search results or required additional information in the query), but also very sparse: we never found more than a fact or two on any one site. Moreover, nearly all of the data that could be gathered from my digital footprint was redundant with what I had deliberately published with the exception of Facebook's incorrect reporting of my "favorite" things.
+
As we have seen, there is a great variety of my personal information publicly available online as a result of my digital footprint. But we have also seen that this information was not only difficult to find, but also very sparse: informative websites were scarce and we never found more than a fact or two on any one site. Moreover, nearly all of the data that could be gathered from my digital footprint is redundant with what I have deliberately published (except for Facebook's incorrect reporting of my "favorite" things).
  
The fact that the data from my digital footprint is redundant with my own published content and hard to find paired with the fact that my deliberately published information is abundant and very easy to obtain tells us that the data that I purposefully published would dominate in any assessment of my online identity. As a result, we can see that it was to my benefit to curate and publish my own information instead of leaving my online identity to be determined solely by my digital footprint. In doing so, not only is my digital footprint over-shadowed and largely silenced, but I got to choose exactly how my online identity would be perceived, as determined by what I choose to publish.
+
The difficulty to find data from my digital footprint and this data's redundancy paired with my deliberately published information's abundancy and ease to locate tells us that my deliberately published data would certainly dominate any assessment of my online identity. As a result, we can see that it is to my benefit to curate and publish my own information instead of leaving my online identity to be determined solely by my digital footprint. In doing so, not only is my digital footprint over-shadowed and largely silenced, but I get to choose exactly how my online identity is perceived, as determined by what I choose to publish.
  
Hence, the power of publishing one's own content about their character is clear: not only can they make their online identity whatever they want it to be, but they are sure to reach a larger audience (possibly recruiters!) with their easily-accessible publications. I will note, however, that this is no easy task: it requires a good deal of work to create the content, but also the coordination of this content between all of your public profiles. Then, regular maintenance on this content is required in order to keep it up-to-date.
+
Hence, the power of publishing one's own content about their identity is clear: not only can they make their online identity whatever they want it to be, but they are sure to reach a larger audience (possibly recruiters!) with their easily-accessible publications. However, this is no easy task: there is a good deal of work required to create the content and coordinate it between all public profiles. Then, regular maintenance on this content is required to keep it up-to-date.
  
Since this is the case, though, it follows that, with sufficient work, anyone can construct a fake persona of themselves online. Attempting to use such a façade to fraudulently obtain something is known as [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phishing phishing], and it does indeed happen on a variety of scales. Such an observation begs the question: why do we search people up online at all if we can't know that this information is representative of their person? Such a concern can be reconciled upon the observation that while my digital footprint did nothing to help inform my online identity, it nonetheless verified (or, at least, did not contradict) my published identity. This goes to show that any piece of information deliberately published is likely to be verified by that publisher's digital footprint.
+
Since everyone is able to construct their online identity however they want, it follows that, with sufficient work, anyone can construct a fake persona of themselves online. Attempting to use such a façade to fraudulently obtain something is known as [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phishing phishing]. Such an observation begs the question: why do we search people up online at all if we can't know that the information is representative of their person? Observe that while my digital footprint did not contribute anything new to my online identity that wasn't already in my deliberate identity, it nonetheless verified (or, at least, did not contradict) my deliberate identity. This goes to show that any piece of information deliberately published is likely to be verified by that publisher's digital footprint.
  
As such, looking for verification in the form of a digital footprint can help in detecting phishers: when there is no verification available or potential verifying information contradicts that which is published, this may be indicative of a phisher. This is not to say that anyone with a disconnect between their digital footprint and their published information should be suspected of phishing (even some of my digital footprint contradicted what I have published!). But rather, this should serve as a warning to approach this potential phisher with caution, perhaps even inquiring as to the disconnect.
+
Hence, I suggest that we look for verification in the form of a digital footprint to help detect phishers. This is not to say that anyone with a disconnect between their digital footprint and their published information should be suspected of phishing (my Facebook "favorites", for example, did not verify any part of my published identity!). But rather, this could serve as a warning to approach individuals with inconsistent (or missing) digital footprints with caution.
 
+
This sparse data from my digital footprint is clearly over-shadowed by the data which I chose to make available. To see this, consider what my online identity would be without my curated sites: it would consist mostly of old athletic records, my Quora account, my Facebook “favorites”, my junk email address, voter information (including age, gender, address, political affiliations, etc.), and my content from the University of Michigan (including my award and my Math Lab work schedule. This collection is by no means indicative of my person! For example, it completely misses my recent athletic endeavors such as Rowing and Ultimate Frisbee, and it misses my devotion to computer science completely. Such a collection would be stable, yet out-of-date and unrepresentative. Instead, what we have is an online identity that is stable, up-to-date, and accurate, but also with the benefit of editable by me.
+
 
+
This overshadowing is evident in that the three sites that I made intentionally are the first to appear in a Google search, and in that there is a lot more data on these three sites than all the others combined – this density of well-put-together information decreases the need to look elsewhere for anyone looking to find information on me. Since the need to look is decreased, fewer investigators will keep looking and eventually find those sites that I did not curate (i.e. those that came from my digital footprint). These websites were very difficult for me to find.
+
 
+
Thus, the benefit to curating your own online identity is clear! Not only can you choose what information you make prominent on your online identity, but you can also “drown” out the parts of that identity that are not as desirable. And you have the benefit of the capability to change your identity by changing which information you make prominent and provide.
+
  
 
== References ==
 
== References ==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>

Latest revision as of 23:53, 5 March 2021

The first page of search results. Those relevant to me are circled.

Preface

In the interests of grabbing the attention of potential employers and recruiters, I have spent a good deal of time in the last few years curating personal information into websites and profiles which I have deliberately published publicly on the internet. In my investigation to find information about myself, I was contented to easily find these websites and profiles. However, upon digging further into the search results, I found some remains left behind from my digital footprint (that is, information that I did not curate and publish, but rather resulted from my mere existence in this digital world).

Through this investigation, we will see that the information I deliberately provided in these publications makes up my entire online identity, while my digital footprint functions as a verifier of this identity's authenticity. This observation paired with the fact that I keep these publications up-to-date will allow us to conclude that my online identity is accurate, verifiably authentic, and stable.

Generalizing from this, we will reason that anyone can create their online identity to be whatever they desire, and such a concern will force us to consider strategies for detecting those who do so with malintent.

My Deliberate Online Identity

When I search "Cooper Stevens" on Google, the sources about me that are on the first page of results are my Facebook, my LinkedIn, and my Next College Student Athlete (NCSA) profile. To my delight, these are three of the four profiles that I have taken the time to curate and publish!

My Facebook and LinkedIn profiles inform on my age, education, work history, residences, and a few photos of me. But this is not all of the information these sites provide: both of these sites contain a link to my portfolio website.

My public portfolio website contains much more personal information, ranging from my significant other to hobbies and academic research. As such, it is very reflective of my personality. This is by design so that I can easily refer potential employers to this website so that they may better get to know me as a person (as opposed to just as a candidate).

The next website that comes up is my NCSA profile for tennis. I set this up during high school so that college recruiters could easily find and contact me. I have not worked to keep this profile up-to-date because there has been no reason to, yet all of the information is still surprisingly accurate today.

Since all of these websites and profiles contain information that is always up-to-date (either because the data hasn't changed or because I am always updating it), it follows that the data I have deliberately made public on these sites is accurate, authentic, and stable.

But since I am the one that published these, we must consider the possibility that I am lying for some benefit. Can we verify my deliberate identity's authenticity?

My Digital Footprint Verifies My Deliberate Identity

My favorite things, according to Facebook.

Apart from the information discussed above, there remains data about me scattered throughout the internet. All of these sites that I will discuss (besides Facebook) were found on pages on or after the fifth page of search results! Needless to say, these were not easy to find, especially when compared to my four curated profiles which could all be found within the first page of search results. In exploring these results, we will find that almost every piece of my digital footprint verifies that which I present in my deliberate identity.

Continuing Our Search for "Cooper Stevens"

The first instance of my digital footprint I found was located at the bottom of my Facebook profile. Here, Facebook displays my "favorite" things which are by-no-means my favorite. As such, these "favorites" fail to verify my deliberate identity. Note, however, that they do not contradict my deliberate identity either.

A list of my qualifications and subject interests, publicly available on my Quora account.

The next piece of my digital footprint that I stumbled upon was my dormant Quora account. Part of my Quora account that is publicly available is a list of my subject interests. While the discovery that these were not private was surprising, it was not concerning as I had already chosen to express my passions for these topics in my online portfolio. Hence, my Quora profile can be used as verification of my deliberate identity.

Digging deeper into the search results, I was delighted to see that data brokers had very little information that could inform my online identity. The information they had was restricted to a list of my family members[1] and neighbors[2], and two email addresses (one of which is not even mine)[3]. The only correct information I found to be behind a paywall was a personal email address. Still, though, this information about my email and neighbors is ineffectual in trying to get to know me as a person, and hence does not inform my online identity. Meanwhile, the information about my family had already been provided in my online portfolio, further verifying my deliberate identity.

After exhausting the results for "Cooper Stevens", I wanted to continue my search! Since I was able to find my education history by only searching my name, I thought it reasonable to make my search more specific by adding my schools to the query.

Educational History

In this query, I found a long history of my performance in athletic competitions. These included cross-country results from middle-school, tennis results from high school[4][5][6][7], and Disc Golf results at the University of Michigan. While this information is all correct, it can really only inform that I am an athletic person. Note, however, that I had already made this characteristic public in my online portfolio.

The last few pieces of publicly available information that I found came directly from the University of Michigan. This information included my receipt of the 2020 William J. Branstrom Prize[8], and my current work schedule at the University of Michigan’s Math Lab. In my online portfolio, I make public that I received this award and work at the Math Lab, so these discoveries further verify the authenticity of my deliberate identity.

Conclusion

As we have seen, there is a great variety of my personal information publicly available online as a result of my digital footprint. But we have also seen that this information was not only difficult to find, but also very sparse: informative websites were scarce and we never found more than a fact or two on any one site. Moreover, nearly all of the data that could be gathered from my digital footprint is redundant with what I have deliberately published (except for Facebook's incorrect reporting of my "favorite" things).

The difficulty to find data from my digital footprint and this data's redundancy paired with my deliberately published information's abundancy and ease to locate tells us that my deliberately published data would certainly dominate any assessment of my online identity. As a result, we can see that it is to my benefit to curate and publish my own information instead of leaving my online identity to be determined solely by my digital footprint. In doing so, not only is my digital footprint over-shadowed and largely silenced, but I get to choose exactly how my online identity is perceived, as determined by what I choose to publish.

Hence, the power of publishing one's own content about their identity is clear: not only can they make their online identity whatever they want it to be, but they are sure to reach a larger audience (possibly recruiters!) with their easily-accessible publications. However, this is no easy task: there is a good deal of work required to create the content and coordinate it between all public profiles. Then, regular maintenance on this content is required to keep it up-to-date.

Since everyone is able to construct their online identity however they want, it follows that, with sufficient work, anyone can construct a fake persona of themselves online. Attempting to use such a façade to fraudulently obtain something is known as phishing. Such an observation begs the question: why do we search people up online at all if we can't know that the information is representative of their person? Observe that while my digital footprint did not contribute anything new to my online identity that wasn't already in my deliberate identity, it nonetheless verified (or, at least, did not contradict) my deliberate identity. This goes to show that any piece of information deliberately published is likely to be verified by that publisher's digital footprint.

Hence, I suggest that we look for verification in the form of a digital footprint to help detect phishers. This is not to say that anyone with a disconnect between their digital footprint and their published information should be suspected of phishing (my Facebook "favorites", for example, did not verify any part of my published identity!). But rather, this could serve as a warning to approach individuals with inconsistent (or missing) digital footprints with caution.

References

  1. Persopo. (2020). Cooper Stevens. Persopo. Retrieved February 18, 2021.
  2. Michigan Residents Database. (2019). Cooper Dean Stevens. Michigan Residents Database. Retrieved February 18, 2021.
  3. instantcheckmate. (2021). Found: Cooper Stevens. instantcheckmate. Retrieved February 18, 2021.
  4. Macomb Daily Sports. (2016, August 26). ROUNDUP: Wins for Utica, Dakota, Cousino. MIPrepZone. Retrieved February 18, 2021.
  5. Macomb Daily Sports. (2015, August 31). Summaries for Aug. 31, 2015. MIPrepZone. Retrieved February 18, 2021.
  6. Macomb Daily Sports. (2015, August 24). TENNIS RESULTS 8/24. MIPrepZone. Retrieved February 18, 2021.
  7. Vest, Mark. (2017, September 25). Chippewa Valley boys tennis wins MAC Blue dual meet championship. C&G Newspapers. Retrieved February 18, 2021.
  8. The University of Michigan. (2020, March 15). "The University of Michigan's 97th Annual Honors Convocation". Ann Arbor; The University of Michigan. Page 114. Retrieved February 18, 2021.