Difference between revisions of "Censorship in China"

From SI410
Jump to: navigation, search
(Ethics Across Borders)
(Added section on DNS Cache Poisoning and the Great Firewall)
Line 13: Line 13:
 
===Getting Past the Firewall===
 
===Getting Past the Firewall===
 
Internet users have found ways over the years to circumvent the censors. Ultrasurf, Psiphon, and Freegate are popular software programs that allow Chinese users to set up proxy servers to avoid controls. While VPNs are also popular, the government crackdown on the systems have led users to devise other methods, including the insertion of new IP addresses into host files, Tor—a free software program for anonymity—or SSH tunnels, which route all internet traffic through a remote server. <ref name="cfr"/>
 
Internet users have found ways over the years to circumvent the censors. Ultrasurf, Psiphon, and Freegate are popular software programs that allow Chinese users to set up proxy servers to avoid controls. While VPNs are also popular, the government crackdown on the systems have led users to devise other methods, including the insertion of new IP addresses into host files, Tor—a free software program for anonymity—or SSH tunnels, which route all internet traffic through a remote server. <ref name="cfr"/>
 +
===DNS Cache Poisoning===
 +
The Domain Name System (DNS) is a hierarchical naming system that maps domain names to IP addresses. The DNS operating correctly is crucial to successful internet browsing. The Chinese government takes advantage of this in order to further impose censorship in China. DNS servers cache DNS requests. Consequently, the Chinese government uses DNS cache poisoning to misdirect requests to banned websites to the wrong IP address. <ref>Fox-Brewster, T. (2015, January 26). Accidental DDoS? How China's Censorship Machine Can Cause Unintended Web Blackouts. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasbrewster/2015/01/26/china-great-firewall-causing-ddos-attacks/#3ff0341f6a47</ref>
  
 
[[File:Winnie.jpg|thumbnail|225px|left|Likening Xi Jinping to Winnie to Pooh <ref>Haas, Benjamin. “China Bans Winnie the Pooh Film after Comparisons to President Xi.” The Guardian, Guardian News and Media, 7 Aug. 2018, www.theguardian.com/world/2018/aug/07/china-bans-winnie-the-pooh-film-to-stop-comparisons-to-president-xi.</ref>]]
 
[[File:Winnie.jpg|thumbnail|225px|left|Likening Xi Jinping to Winnie to Pooh <ref>Haas, Benjamin. “China Bans Winnie the Pooh Film after Comparisons to President Xi.” The Guardian, Guardian News and Media, 7 Aug. 2018, www.theguardian.com/world/2018/aug/07/china-bans-winnie-the-pooh-film-to-stop-comparisons-to-president-xi.</ref>]]

Revision as of 15:23, 6 April 2019

Censorship is the suppression or prohibition of any parts of books, films, news, etc. that are considered obscene, politically unacceptable, or a threat to security.[1] Censorship in China has been practiced throughout its history including the burning of Confucian texts by Emperor Qin in the third century BCE and the control of media during the Cultural Revolution. With the rise of the internet, China has an army of bots and millions of human censors working around the clock to police daily activities.[2] This effort is commonly known around the world as The Great Firewall.

The Great Firewall

Purpose

Methods for internet censorship include bandwidth throttling, keyword filtering, and blocking access to certain websites. These websites include but are not limited to Facebook, Twitter, Google, and Wikipedia. Beyond the firewall, the government has also turned to shuttering publications or websites, and jailing dissident journalists, bloggers, and activists.[3] It is not known exactly how the Firewall filters through posts, videos, comments, and other forms of user generated content. Some never appear while others appear but are removed, while others appear and stay. Research done in 2014 showed that China allows for the criticisms of the state, its leaders, and their policies, whereas posts with collective action potential are much more likely to be censored. Censorship in China is used to muzzle those outside government who attempt to spur the creation of crowds for any reason—in opposition to, in support of, or unrelated to the government. The government allows the Chinese people to say whatever they like about the state, its leaders, or their policies, because talk about any subject unconnected to collective action is not censored. The value that Chinese leaders find in allowing and then measuring criticism by hundreds of millions of Chinese people creates actionable information for them and, as a result, also for academic scholars and public policy analysts.[4]

Comparison for search results related to The Tiananmen Square Incident [5]

Google

Google had set up shop in mainland China in 2006, offering a version of its services that conformed to the government’s oppressive censorship policies. At the time, Google officials said they’d decided that the most ethical option was to offer some services—albeit restricted by China’s censors—to the enormous Chinese market, rather than leave millions of Internet users with limited access to information. However, in 2010, Google shut down its search engine and all operations within mainland China after a cyber attack where it found that the Gmail accounts of a number of Chinese human-rights activists had been hacked. It moved all operations to Hong Kong, China where all forms of traditional and nontraditional media was uncensored at the time.[6] In 2018, Google revealed its plans to launch a censored version of its search engine within China again named the "Dragonfly Project". Many employees protested, naming the "urgent moral and ethical issues" involved in the move.[7]

Google vs Baidu

Baidu is the largest search engine in China with over 2 billion users.[8] However, because of its censorship, the affordances of Google and Baidu are vastly different. This has led many to crack the firewall for access to tools such as Gmail and Google Scholar. With Google hoping to reenter mainland China, the search results may look more similar to that of Baidu while affording China's users the access to Google resources.[5]

Getting Past the Firewall

Internet users have found ways over the years to circumvent the censors. Ultrasurf, Psiphon, and Freegate are popular software programs that allow Chinese users to set up proxy servers to avoid controls. While VPNs are also popular, the government crackdown on the systems have led users to devise other methods, including the insertion of new IP addresses into host files, Tor—a free software program for anonymity—or SSH tunnels, which route all internet traffic through a remote server. [3]

DNS Cache Poisoning

The Domain Name System (DNS) is a hierarchical naming system that maps domain names to IP addresses. The DNS operating correctly is crucial to successful internet browsing. The Chinese government takes advantage of this in order to further impose censorship in China. DNS servers cache DNS requests. Consequently, the Chinese government uses DNS cache poisoning to misdirect requests to banned websites to the wrong IP address. [9]

Likening Xi Jinping to Winnie to Pooh [10]

Banned Words/Concepts

There are lists of words and concepts that are permanently blacked out from Chinese media. There are also lists of words and concepts that are only temporarily blacked out of Chinese media because of the context it is used in.

An example of this was when the Chinese population turned to likening President Xi Jinping with Winnie the Pooh. All mentions of Winnie the Pooh or anything distinctly similar were banned from China. Another example of this was when the letter "N" was briefly banned in China. When word spread about the dropping of President Xi's term limits and his indefinite stay in power, the letter "N" was used like that of a mathematical equation where n>2 where n=term limits. Words such as "immortality" and "ascend the throne" were also banned in fear of civilian pushback. [11]


Ethics

Association of Computing Machinery

The largest professional organisation for computing, the Association of Computing Machinery (ACM), recently updated its code of ethics. Many employees of large western companies are members of the ACM, meaning they have agreed to abide by this code. The code includes phrases such as “to contribute to society and to human well being”, “promoting human rights and protecting each individual’s right to autonomy” and "computing professionals should take action to avoid creating systems or technologies that disenfranchise or oppress people”[12]. It has proven to be a challenge to follow the ACM code of ethics while also trying to forge a path into the Chinese market which holds the constraints of the Chinese firewall and other censorship policies. Moves such as the Dragonfly Project from Google have led people to question whether US companies are putting profits before ethics in China. US lawmakers claimed that China's vast and lucrative market has prompted US companies to put ethical considerations to the side in adhering to Beijing's restrictive rules. US Internet providers defended their co-operation with the Chinese government, saying that restricted online access, while less than ideal, is still of great benefit to the vast majority of people in China. [13]

Ethics Across Borders

The ethical issues associated with censorship in China have raised a number of questions regarding how legislation and value systems among different cultures should interact with one another across borders. In his article: "Should You Have The Right To Be Forgotten On Google? Nationally, Yes. Globally, No." , Luciano Floridi, a Professor Philosophy at the University of Oxford, addresses some the ethical challenges associated with translating cultural values and ethics across borders. [14] Floridi discusses his experience as a member of Google's Advisory Council on the Right to be Forgotten, whose purpose is to formulate a set of guidelines for determining what constitutes a valid "delink request" or removal of information from Google's search engines around the world. One issue that Floridi confronts early on in his article is the intersection of privacy and freedom of speech. In the case of China, a decision to censor certain portions of the internet based on their own unique set of principle represents a value which clashes with a large portion of the Western World, freedom of speech. What may seem as a blatant infringement on human civil rights within one country may in another be accepted as part of their culture. The ethical question of how legislation across borders should treat this issue remains unclear.

References

  1. “Censorship | Definition of Censorship in English by Oxford Dictionaries.” Oxford Dictionaries | English, Oxford Dictionaries, en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/censorship.
  2. Hunt, Katie, and CY Xu. “China 'Employs 2 Million to Police Internet'.” CNN, Cable News Network, 7 Oct. 2013, www.cnn.com/2013/10/07/world/asia/china-internet-monitors/index.html.
  3. 3.0 3.1 “Media Censorship in China.” Council on Foreign Relations, Council on Foreign Relations, www.cfr.org/backgrounder/media-censorship-china.
  4. King, Gary, et al. “Reverse-Engineering Censorship in China: Randomized Experimentation and Participant Observation.” Science, American Association for the Advancement of Science, 22 Aug. 2014, science.sciencemag.org/content/345/6199/1251722?casa_token=f8ofS6DrYqcAAAAA%3AvwldmGPv7KxV2DIX7Xt7NMKVhxYlZuCXOKzhfTjsEQ9xaCui3YRkUVhvA1EkkgGFc0LUVe0WaIEFLMA.
  5. 5.0 5.1 Sonnad, Nikhil. “See What China Sees When It Searches for ‘Tiananmen’ and Other Loaded Terms.” Quartz, Quartz, 11 Feb. 2015, qz.com/216829/see-what-china-sees-when-it-searches-for-tiananmen-and-other-loaded-terms/.
  6. Waddell, Kaveh. “Why Google Quit China-and Why It's Heading Back.” The Atlantic, Atlantic Media Company, 19 Jan. 2016, www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2016/01/why-google-quit-china-and-why-its-heading-back/424482/.
  7. Theintercept. “Google Staff Tell Bosses China Censorship Is ‘Moral and Ethical’ Crisis.” The Intercept, 16 Aug. 2018, theintercept.com/2018/08/16/google-china-crisis-staff-dragonfly/.
  8. “Baidu.” Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation, 28 Mar. 2019, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baidu.
  9. Fox-Brewster, T. (2015, January 26). Accidental DDoS? How China's Censorship Machine Can Cause Unintended Web Blackouts. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasbrewster/2015/01/26/china-great-firewall-causing-ddos-attacks/#3ff0341f6a47
  10. Haas, Benjamin. “China Bans Winnie the Pooh Film after Comparisons to President Xi.” The Guardian, Guardian News and Media, 7 Aug. 2018, www.theguardian.com/world/2018/aug/07/china-bans-winnie-the-pooh-film-to-stop-comparisons-to-president-xi.
  11. Criss, Doug. “Why China Banned the Letter 'N'.” CNN, Cable News Network, 4 Mar. 2018, www.cnn.com/2018/03/01/asia/china-letter-ban-trnd/index.html.
  12. Flick, Catherine. “Why Google's Censored Search Engine for China Is Such an Ethical Minefield.” The Independent, Independent Digital News and Media, 8 Aug. 2018, www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/features/china-great-firewall-google-online-internet-censorship-project-dragonfly-a8480016.html.
  13. Chinese Censorship, ethics.csc.ncsu.edu/speech/freedom/china/study.php.
  14. Floridi, Luciano "Should You Have The Right To Be Forgotten On Google? Nationally, Yes. Globally, No." 2015