Difference between revisions of "CGI Influencers"
m (→Lil Miquela) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | CGI influencers are computer-generated characters that use social media accounts in order to connect with | + | CGI influencers are computer-generated characters that use social media accounts in order to connect with real audiences through the Internet. Many of these influencers are created and built by developers and designers. While this can seem strange to some, according to USA Today, “their existence is fake, but their influence is real”.<ref>Trepany, Charles. “The Robot Invasion Has Begun: Meet the Computer-Generated Influencers Taking over Instagram.” USA Today, Gannett Satellite Information Network, 3 Feb. 2021, https://usatoday.com/story/life/2019/10/16/cgi-influencers-blur-line-between-reality-and-fantasy-instagram-advertising/3790471002/.</ref> |
| − | These digital influencers are mainly used for advertising and | + | These digital influencers are mainly used for advertising and for promoting brands and products on social media. |
==Lil Miquela== | ==Lil Miquela== | ||
| − | One of the most well-known virtual influencers is Lil Miquela, who debuted on Instagram in April 2016, where she currently has 3 million followers. She was created by the L.A.-based | + | One of the most well-known virtual influencers is Lil Miquela, who debuted on Instagram in April 2016, where she currently has 3 million followers. She was created by the L.A.-based startup Brud, which specializes in artificial intelligence and robotics as well as their applications to media businesses.<ref>“Brud - Crunchbase Company Profile & Funding.” Crunchbase, https://crunchbase.com/organization/brud.</ref> Her identity involves being a 19-year-old Brazilian-American model and musical artist. On her Instagram account, she can be seen wearing real-life clothes by popular brands and hanging out with other real influencers in cities like New York and Los Angeles.<ref name="thecut">Brud, Courtesy of. “Lil Miquela's Body Con Job.” The Cut, 11 May 2018, https://thecut.com/2018/05/lil-miquela-digital-avatar-instagram-influencer.html.</ref> |
[[File:Lil_miquela.jpg|thumb|Lil Miquela, digital CGI influencer<ref name="thecut">Brud, Courtesy of. “Lil Miquela's Body Con Job.” The Cut, 11 May 2018, https://thecut.com/2018/05/lil-miquela-digital-avatar-instagram-influencer.html</ref>]] | [[File:Lil_miquela.jpg|thumb|Lil Miquela, digital CGI influencer<ref name="thecut">Brud, Courtesy of. “Lil Miquela's Body Con Job.” The Cut, 11 May 2018, https://thecut.com/2018/05/lil-miquela-digital-avatar-instagram-influencer.html</ref>]] | ||
| − | Since her debut, Lil Miquela has sparked different opinions from | + | Since her debut, Lil Miquela has sparked different opinions from all sorts of people. Some are intrigued and curious, while others are shocked and alarmed. She has been described as a “Sims marketing stunt” as well as a “horrifying social experiment”, but the reality is that she is simply being used for advertising, and it is clear that she is one of the most influential digital avatars.<ref>Tiffany, Kaitlyn. “Lil Miquela and the Virtual Influencer Hype, Explained.” Vox, Vox, 3 June 2019, www.vox.com/the-goods/2019/6/3/18647626/instagram-virtual-influencers-lil-miquela-ai-startups.</ref> |
| − | In fact, the creators of Lil Miquela closed a $125 million investment round led by Spark Capital. | + | In fact, the creators of Lil Miquela closed a $125 million investment round led by Spark Capital. Time Magazine even ranked Lil Miquela as one of the 25 most influential people on the internet in 2018.<ref>Tayenaka, Torrey. “CGI-Created Virtual Influencers Are the New Trend in Social Media Marketing.” Entrepreneur, Entrepreneur, 31 July 2020, https://entrepreneur.com/article/352937.</ref> |
==Impact on Advertising== | ==Impact on Advertising== | ||
| − | Although some have speculated that these new digital influencers might start taking over jobs that are designated for models and those in the fashion industry, there is | + | Although some have speculated that these new digital influencers might start taking over jobs that are designated for models and those in the fashion industry, there is little proof that this will be the case.<ref>Dodgson, Lindsay. “Fake, Computer-Generated Instagram Influencers Are Modeling Designer Clothes, Wearing Spanx, and Attending Red Carpet Premieres.” Insider, Insider, 15 Jan. 2020, https://insider.com/cgi-influencers-what-are-they-where-did-they-come-from-2019-8.</ref> There are currently not that many virtual influencers, and their influence right now could be more due to shock value since they are so novel. Thus, it is unclear whether this influence will last over time, since shock value eventually fades. |
==Diversity and Representation== | ==Diversity and Representation== | ||
| − | With every new innovative product, controversy always comes with it. One major controversy | + | With every new innovative product, controversy almost always comes with it. One major controversy regarding these digital influencers is that they are made out of pixels and can be created to be "perfect", while real models need to deal with societal pressure on them to be as physically perfect as possible. As such, many say that it is paradoxical how society is simultaneously trying to push forward the concepts of body positivity and self-love while making beauty standards even more extreme through these crafted digital avatars. According to a Fullscreen study, 42 percent of Gen Z and millennials have followed an influencer they didn’t even realize was CGI.<ref>Rebecca Paddon, et al. “CGI Betrayal: New Study Reveals 42% of People Don't Know They're Following a Bot.” Adotas, 24 Jan. 2019, https://adotas.com/2019/01/cgi-betrayal-new-study-reveals-42-people-dont-know-theyre-following-bot/.</ref> The fact that many people cannot actually tell the difference between someone who is human and someone who is CGI has been pointed out to be problematic. Frank Mulhern, a marketing professor at Northwestern University, says that in the future it will be even more difficult to tell the difference between CGI and human influencers as technology constantly improves.<ref>“CGI Influencers Are Ushering in a Brave New World in Advertising.” Newsela, https://newsela.com/read/cgi-instagram-influencers/id/2000000712/.</ref> |
| − | Frank Mulhern, a marketing professor at Northwestern University, says that in the future it will be even more difficult to tell the difference between CGI and human influencers as technology constantly improves.<ref>“CGI Influencers Are Ushering in a Brave New World in Advertising.” Newsela, https://newsela.com/read/cgi-instagram-influencers/id/2000000712/.</ref> | + | |
| − | Another huge controversy is surrounding the supposed “diversity” of virtual influencers. In a Calvin Klein campaign, the brand featured a video where supermodel Bella Hadid made out with Lil Miquela, the previously mentioned virtual influencer. This | + | Another huge controversy is surrounding the supposed “diversity” of virtual influencers. In a Calvin Klein campaign, the brand featured a video where supermodel Bella Hadid made out with Lil Miquela, the previously mentioned virtual influencer. This received much backlash, as people criticized Calvin Klein for queer-baiting without even hiring a real queer person. Many pointed out that the role Lil Miquela played in this campaign could have gone to a real underrepresented group, but instead went to an assemblage of pixels with no real personal context.<ref>Petrarca, Emilia. “Calvin Klein Apologizes for Bella Hadid and Lil Miquela Campaign.” The Cut, The Cut, 20 May 2019, https://thecut.com/2019/05/bella-hadid-lil-miquela-calvin-klein-apology.html.</ref> |
==Advantages of Digital Influencers for Brands== | ==Advantages of Digital Influencers for Brands== | ||
| − | The biggest advantage of CGI influencers is that brands can completely control them as well as the environment with which they interact. With real influencers, they may express personal or political opinions and values that do not appeal to some groups of people. Although this may appeal to their own followers, this | + | The biggest advantage of CGI influencers is that brands can completely control them as well as the environment with which they interact. With real influencers, they may express personal or political opinions and values that do not appeal to some groups of people. Although this may appeal to their own personal followers, this can be polarizing and harmful for brands' images. If an influencer is involved in a scandal, this would have negative consequences on any brands or businesses the influencer is partnered with. However, a digital influencer has much less risk of being mixed up in a scandal since they can be managed by their company. Additionally, another advantage is that digital influencers can be photographed with products anywhere in the world.<ref>“CGI Influencers: What Are They and How to Work With Them.” GRIN, 12 Feb. 2021, https://grin.co/blog/cgi-influencers/.</ref> |
Companies can design their advertisements to their heart’s content. Anything from their outfits to cosmetics to scenery to buildings can be programmed and added virtually. | Companies can design their advertisements to their heart’s content. Anything from their outfits to cosmetics to scenery to buildings can be programmed and added virtually. | ||
==Disadvantages of Digital Influencers for Brands== | ==Disadvantages of Digital Influencers for Brands== | ||
| − | The flip side of the greatest advantage of CGI influencers is also their greatest disadvantage. Because they are not real and can be controlled | + | The flip side of the greatest advantage of CGI influencers is also their greatest disadvantage. Because they are not real humans and can be controlled however companies want to, consumers may be less likely to trust them. This can be troubling for brands, since the primary reason businesses partner with influencers is to gain more trust from consumers. While digital influencers can have influence and motivate social media users to purchase products or services, they cannot exactly replicate human influencers’ performance.<ref>“What Are CGI Influencers : Pros and Cons Of CGI Influencers.” DigiReload, https://digireload.com/what-are-cgi-influencers-and-pros-cons-of-cgi-influencers.html.</ref> |
==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 15:24, 16 April 2021
CGI influencers are computer-generated characters that use social media accounts in order to connect with real audiences through the Internet. Many of these influencers are created and built by developers and designers. While this can seem strange to some, according to USA Today, “their existence is fake, but their influence is real”.[1] These digital influencers are mainly used for advertising and for promoting brands and products on social media.
Contents
Lil Miquela
One of the most well-known virtual influencers is Lil Miquela, who debuted on Instagram in April 2016, where she currently has 3 million followers. She was created by the L.A.-based startup Brud, which specializes in artificial intelligence and robotics as well as their applications to media businesses.[2] Her identity involves being a 19-year-old Brazilian-American model and musical artist. On her Instagram account, she can be seen wearing real-life clothes by popular brands and hanging out with other real influencers in cities like New York and Los Angeles.[3]
Since her debut, Lil Miquela has sparked different opinions from all sorts of people. Some are intrigued and curious, while others are shocked and alarmed. She has been described as a “Sims marketing stunt” as well as a “horrifying social experiment”, but the reality is that she is simply being used for advertising, and it is clear that she is one of the most influential digital avatars.[4] In fact, the creators of Lil Miquela closed a $125 million investment round led by Spark Capital. Time Magazine even ranked Lil Miquela as one of the 25 most influential people on the internet in 2018.[5]
Impact on Advertising
Although some have speculated that these new digital influencers might start taking over jobs that are designated for models and those in the fashion industry, there is little proof that this will be the case.[6] There are currently not that many virtual influencers, and their influence right now could be more due to shock value since they are so novel. Thus, it is unclear whether this influence will last over time, since shock value eventually fades.
Diversity and Representation
With every new innovative product, controversy almost always comes with it. One major controversy regarding these digital influencers is that they are made out of pixels and can be created to be "perfect", while real models need to deal with societal pressure on them to be as physically perfect as possible. As such, many say that it is paradoxical how society is simultaneously trying to push forward the concepts of body positivity and self-love while making beauty standards even more extreme through these crafted digital avatars. According to a Fullscreen study, 42 percent of Gen Z and millennials have followed an influencer they didn’t even realize was CGI.[7] The fact that many people cannot actually tell the difference between someone who is human and someone who is CGI has been pointed out to be problematic. Frank Mulhern, a marketing professor at Northwestern University, says that in the future it will be even more difficult to tell the difference between CGI and human influencers as technology constantly improves.[8]
Another huge controversy is surrounding the supposed “diversity” of virtual influencers. In a Calvin Klein campaign, the brand featured a video where supermodel Bella Hadid made out with Lil Miquela, the previously mentioned virtual influencer. This received much backlash, as people criticized Calvin Klein for queer-baiting without even hiring a real queer person. Many pointed out that the role Lil Miquela played in this campaign could have gone to a real underrepresented group, but instead went to an assemblage of pixels with no real personal context.[9]
Advantages of Digital Influencers for Brands
The biggest advantage of CGI influencers is that brands can completely control them as well as the environment with which they interact. With real influencers, they may express personal or political opinions and values that do not appeal to some groups of people. Although this may appeal to their own personal followers, this can be polarizing and harmful for brands' images. If an influencer is involved in a scandal, this would have negative consequences on any brands or businesses the influencer is partnered with. However, a digital influencer has much less risk of being mixed up in a scandal since they can be managed by their company. Additionally, another advantage is that digital influencers can be photographed with products anywhere in the world.[10] Companies can design their advertisements to their heart’s content. Anything from their outfits to cosmetics to scenery to buildings can be programmed and added virtually.
Disadvantages of Digital Influencers for Brands
The flip side of the greatest advantage of CGI influencers is also their greatest disadvantage. Because they are not real humans and can be controlled however companies want to, consumers may be less likely to trust them. This can be troubling for brands, since the primary reason businesses partner with influencers is to gain more trust from consumers. While digital influencers can have influence and motivate social media users to purchase products or services, they cannot exactly replicate human influencers’ performance.[11]
References
- ↑ Trepany, Charles. “The Robot Invasion Has Begun: Meet the Computer-Generated Influencers Taking over Instagram.” USA Today, Gannett Satellite Information Network, 3 Feb. 2021, https://usatoday.com/story/life/2019/10/16/cgi-influencers-blur-line-between-reality-and-fantasy-instagram-advertising/3790471002/.
- ↑ “Brud - Crunchbase Company Profile & Funding.” Crunchbase, https://crunchbase.com/organization/brud.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Brud, Courtesy of. “Lil Miquela's Body Con Job.” The Cut, 11 May 2018, https://thecut.com/2018/05/lil-miquela-digital-avatar-instagram-influencer.html.
- ↑ Tiffany, Kaitlyn. “Lil Miquela and the Virtual Influencer Hype, Explained.” Vox, Vox, 3 June 2019, www.vox.com/the-goods/2019/6/3/18647626/instagram-virtual-influencers-lil-miquela-ai-startups.
- ↑ Tayenaka, Torrey. “CGI-Created Virtual Influencers Are the New Trend in Social Media Marketing.” Entrepreneur, Entrepreneur, 31 July 2020, https://entrepreneur.com/article/352937.
- ↑ Dodgson, Lindsay. “Fake, Computer-Generated Instagram Influencers Are Modeling Designer Clothes, Wearing Spanx, and Attending Red Carpet Premieres.” Insider, Insider, 15 Jan. 2020, https://insider.com/cgi-influencers-what-are-they-where-did-they-come-from-2019-8.
- ↑ Rebecca Paddon, et al. “CGI Betrayal: New Study Reveals 42% of People Don't Know They're Following a Bot.” Adotas, 24 Jan. 2019, https://adotas.com/2019/01/cgi-betrayal-new-study-reveals-42-people-dont-know-theyre-following-bot/.
- ↑ “CGI Influencers Are Ushering in a Brave New World in Advertising.” Newsela, https://newsela.com/read/cgi-instagram-influencers/id/2000000712/.
- ↑ Petrarca, Emilia. “Calvin Klein Apologizes for Bella Hadid and Lil Miquela Campaign.” The Cut, The Cut, 20 May 2019, https://thecut.com/2019/05/bella-hadid-lil-miquela-calvin-klein-apology.html.
- ↑ “CGI Influencers: What Are They and How to Work With Them.” GRIN, 12 Feb. 2021, https://grin.co/blog/cgi-influencers/.
- ↑ “What Are CGI Influencers : Pros and Cons Of CGI Influencers.” DigiReload, https://digireload.com/what-are-cgi-influencers-and-pros-cons-of-cgi-influencers.html.
