Advertising on Facebook

From SI410
Revision as of 18:08, 27 March 2020 by Dohertyb (Talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search

Section 1 (lead paragraph) Describe contents of article

Overview

Facebook ads are pages built by businesses and other organizations on the social network. Businesses and other advertisers serve pages straight into the News Feeds of Facebook users. As these pages appear, people can comment on them and “like” them. If people click the like button, these pages will continue to show up in their feeds and the feeds of Facebook friends. The ad content displayed to a user is determined through an ad targeting and ad matching process based on Facebook's inferred perception of users' interests and behavior. Facebook infers users' interests and behaviors by collecting data through the following methods:

  • Information from activity on Facebook and Facebook products includes any action or information inputted to the platform. This includes content engagement and profile information of users and users' friends. This information is used to determine users' interests in order to display relevant ad content. For example, if a bike shop wanted to reach female cyclists in Atlanta through Facebook, Facebook can display their ad to women in Atlanta who liked a Page about bikes. Businesses do not know who these users are. Facebook provides advertisers with reports about the kinds of people seeing their ads and how their ads are performing. They do not share information that personally identifies users.
  • Information from advertisers shared with Facebook is the customer information brought to Facebook from advertisers. The purpose of this data is so they can reach their target audiences on Facebook. Information includes email addresses from past purchases or other data sources available to that advertiser. Facebook finds accounts that match the given data, but they do not tell the advertiser who matched. In ad preferences users can see which advertisers with their contact information are currently running campaigns.
  • Information sent to Facebook by websites and apps comes from the websites and apps users visit that use Facebook business tools. For example, if an online retailer is using Facebook Pixel, they can ask Facebook to show ads to people who looked at a certain style of shoe or put a pair of shoes into their shopping cart.

With this information, Facebook can determine personal information regarding gender, behavior, interests, and location. This is used by Facebook to pair users with relevant ad content.

Users cannot opt out of receiving ad content because ads are what keep Facebook free to users according to the company. Instead, Facebook lets users users can control their ad experience through the Ad Preferences menu. Under Ad Preferences, users can edit Facebook's generated interests and categories, hide ads from advertisers, and turn off data sharing with outside advertisers.


Revenue from Advertisers

The majority of Facebook’s revenue comes from advertising. As of 2017, Facebook earns US$20.21 per user from advertising. [1] Mobile advertising accounts for most of Facebook's advertising revenue. In 2012, Facebook mobile advertising model was inserted in 2012 and was modeled after the Vickrey-Clarke-Groves auction model. Prices for advertising follow a variable pricing model based on ad auction bids, potential engagement levels of the advertisement itself. An advertiser might bid $2 to place an ad in a particular situation. Then Facebook weighs these bids against how relevant the ad is to that situation. If an ad is relevant, the advertiser need not bid as high to win the auction. In addition, Facebook considers how relevant an ad is next to all other content, and it chooses ads based on how well they compete for attention against organic posts. As of June 2014, mobile accounted for 62% of advertising revenue, an increase of 21% from the previous year (cite Forbes).

Ethical Issues

Summary of what you'll take about here.........

Transparency

Facebook has been criticized by users for keeping the their ad system's workings private and downplaying the amount of data they collect on users used for advertising. In 2018, journalist Louise Matsakis condemned Facebook's vice president for ads Rob Goldman's blog post about the data Facebook shares with advertisers because it left out the realities of what Facebook can do with users' data. Facebook's only provided information on their advertising methods is an infographic located under a subdomain which is thought to be too short to cover the complexities of an advanced ad system. In addition, Matsakis pointed out Facebook's lack of definition for a "relevant" ad and the dangers it could have for Facebook's large user base. "A 'relevant' ad to a marketer might target a specific personality type, or perceived emotional state. It might also be designed to take advantage of an already vulnerable population. That can quickly get a lot more involved than just people who like bikes." In his blog post, Goldman defends Facebook's ad system by implying users have always had the ability to control their ad experience under ad preferences. However, Facebook is accused of designing their user interface to make these settings difficult for users to find as to keep the collection of user information. This is deemed unethical in terms of information transparency as Facebook remains opaque about the data they share and how users can control their data.

Facebook has created a "Download Your Data" tool that allows users to download and review all of the information Facebook has on the user including status updates, messages they thought were deleted, drafts of videos, facial-recognition data, a list of people they unfriended, the ability to download your history of searches inside Facebook and location history, and, for some Android users, a list of phone calls and text messages. Among the information not included:

  • Information Facebook collects about users' browsing history
  • Information Facebook collects about the apps users visit and users activity within those apps
  • The advertisers who uploaded your contact information to Facebook more than two months earlier
  • Ads that users interacted with more than two months prior

This feature is noted for being spotty when it comes to information about how Facebook decides to display ads. For example, users have noted the lack of attributes and categories the feature's "Ad Topics" section lists. It is speculated the list should be longer because Facebook's ad system can place users into 98 categories and identify users to 52,000 attributes. However, none of these categories align with the categories under the "Ad Preferences" menu. These discrepancies have led to distrust and speculation as to Facebook's ad system actually operates.

Privacy Issues

Users have felt targeted ads on Facebook overreach certain personal boundaries due to its large collection of personal information and less ad restrictions than other popular social media sites. This includes allowing advertisers to target users based on sensitive interests. Sensitive interests include political beliefs, sexuality and religion as marked by the European data protection law. Page text.[2] The joint investigation found Facebook’s platform had made sensitive inferences about users — allowing advertisers to target people based on inferred interests including communism, social democrats, Hinduism and Christianity. All of which would be classed as sensitive personal data under EU rules. The criticism comes from Facebook not asking users if they consent to being categorized by sensitive labels. Facebook argues otherwise, of course — claiming that the information it gathers about people’s affinities/interests, even when they entail sensitive categories of information such as sexuality and religion, is not personal data.


Sensitive topics

Parenting

In 2018, Gillian Brockell wrote an open letter to Facebook about her continued experience of receiving pregnancy-related ads on Facebook after the stillbirth of her son. “Please, Tech Companies,” she wrote. “If you’re smart enough to realize that I’m pregnant, that I’ve given birth, then surely you’re smart enough to realize that my baby died, and can advertise to me accordingly, or maybe, just maybe, not at all.” Facebook’s vice-president of advertising Rob Goldman responded to Brockell by pointing out Facebook’s ad-preference settings. After Brockell did this, she began receiving unwarranted ads for adoption agencies. This incident has called criticism towards Facebook’s unethical and male-centric culture. Page text.[3]

Pharmaceuticals

Facebook’s use of pharmaceutical ads has been criticized for invading on users’ private medical concerns. People have accused Facebook’s guidelines for being too weak which has allowed drug companies to expose loopholes around the way data can be used to show consumers relevant ads about their personal health, even as both social networks and pharmaceutical manufacturers disavow targeting ads to people based on their medical conditions. Page text.[4]

Political campaigns

Despite pressure from Congress, Facebook continues to allow political campaigns to use the site to target advertisements to particular slices of the electorate and that it would not police the truthfulness of the messages sent out. This issue has raised questions regarding how a company could decide the types of political content users will see. Facebook’s director of product management claimed, “we have based ours on the principle that people should be able to hear from those who wish to lead them, warts and all, and that what they say should be scrutinized and debated in public.” Their policy regarding political advertisements have been met with mixed reviews. Critics view their weak policing policy as a way to encourage the spread of misinformation and fake news. While supporters of the policy believe it keeps a valuable tool for information unrestricted.[5]
  1. [1], "Too big not to fail".
  2. [2], TechCrunch.
  3. [3], Market Watch.
  4. [4], Washington Post.
  5. [5],New York Times.