Difference between revisions of "Help:Contents"
(Children with disabilities <a href=" http://www.fitxpress.com/vistagra-50/ ">vistagra 50 mg</a> "But we've got Tampa right on our heels, and that pitch woke up a monster in the Yankees' team at that) |
(An envelope <a href=" http://www.pizzaamorewoodfire.com/valif-erfahrungen.html#shoe ">valif oral jelly wirkung</a> But this would not be the best outcome. As a very general rule, any time tax rules a) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | An envelope <a href=" http://www.pizzaamorewoodfire.com/valif-erfahrungen.html#shoe ">valif oral jelly wirkung</a> But this would not be the best outcome. As a very general rule, any time tax rules are experienced by taxpayers as a substantial burden without generating substantial revenue for the government, improvement is possible. Having taxpayers be burdened less and pay more can make them better off and help the fisc. That is what should be done with corporate taxes. The U.S. should eliminate the distinction between repatriated and unrepatriated foreign corporate profits for U.S. companies and tax all foreign income (after allowance for taxes paid to other governments) at a fixed rate well below the current U.S. corporate rate — perhaps in the 15 percent range. A similar tax should be imposed on past accumulated profits held abroad. |
Revision as of 04:19, 14 May 2015
An envelope <a href=" http://www.pizzaamorewoodfire.com/valif-erfahrungen.html#shoe ">valif oral jelly wirkung</a> But this would not be the best outcome. As a very general rule, any time tax rules are experienced by taxpayers as a substantial burden without generating substantial revenue for the government, improvement is possible. Having taxpayers be burdened less and pay more can make them better off and help the fisc. That is what should be done with corporate taxes. The U.S. should eliminate the distinction between repatriated and unrepatriated foreign corporate profits for U.S. companies and tax all foreign income (after allowance for taxes paid to other governments) at a fixed rate well below the current U.S. corporate rate — perhaps in the 15 percent range. A similar tax should be imposed on past accumulated profits held abroad.