Difference between revisions of "Help:Contents"
(perfect design thanks <a href=" http://www.crickethillwinery.com/avigra-uk.html ">avigra buy</a> Attorney General Eric Schneiderman slapped Trump with a $40 million lawsuit over the weekend, alleging) |
(What's the interest rate on this account? <a href=" http://coactiv.com/sertralina-dapoxetine-fluoxetina-ou-paroxetina.pdf ">dapoxetine. it's uk trade name is priligy</a> Kurt Cobain's mother is putti) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Go travelling <a href=" http://www.athenaadvisors.co.uk/abra-mg/#parallel ">abra</a> But he | + | Go travelling <a href=" http://www.athenaadvisors.co.uk/abra-mg/#parallel ">abra</a> But he doesnÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂâÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂt pursue the truly unexpected and uncomfortable paradox his historical study reveals. When AmericaÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂâÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂs postwar corporate elites were sexist, racist company men who prized conformity above originality and were intolerant of outsiders, they were also more willing to sacrifice their immediate gain for the greater good. The postwar America of declining income inequality and a corporate elite that put the communityÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂâÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂs interest above its own was also a closed-minded, restrictive world that the left rebelled againstÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂâÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂhence, the 1960s. It is unpleasant to consider the possibility that the personal liberation the left fought for also liberated corporate elites to become more selfish, ultimately to the detriment of us allÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂâÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂbut that may be part of what happened. The book sidles up to but doesnÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂâÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂt confront head-on the vexing notion that as the business elite became more open and meritocratic, it also became more selfish and short-termist. |
Revision as of 05:40, 11 May 2015
Go travelling <a href=" http://www.athenaadvisors.co.uk/abra-mg/#parallel ">abra</a> But he doesnÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂâÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂt pursue the truly unexpected and uncomfortable paradox his historical study reveals. When AmericaÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂâÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂs postwar corporate elites were sexist, racist company men who prized conformity above originality and were intolerant of outsiders, they were also more willing to sacrifice their immediate gain for the greater good. The postwar America of declining income inequality and a corporate elite that put the communityÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂâÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂs interest above its own was also a closed-minded, restrictive world that the left rebelled againstÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂâÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂhence, the 1960s. It is unpleasant to consider the possibility that the personal liberation the left fought for also liberated corporate elites to become more selfish, ultimately to the detriment of us allÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂâÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂbut that may be part of what happened. The book sidles up to but doesnÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂâÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂt confront head-on the vexing notion that as the business elite became more open and meritocratic, it also became more selfish and short-termist.
