Difference between revisions of "Help:Contents"
(Go travelling <a href=" http://www.athenaadvisors.co.uk/abra-mg/#parallel ">abra</a> But he doesnât pursue the truly unexpected and uncomfortable paradox his historical study reveals. When Americaâ) |
(I'm not interested in football <a href=" http://www.davehebb.com/tazzle-10mg-dr-reddy.pdf ">tazzle tadalafil</a> âÂÂThe woman is smart and well-spoken, but WendyâÂÂs producers said no one taller than) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | Go travelling <a href=" http://www.athenaadvisors.co.uk/abra-mg/#parallel ">abra</a> But he | + | Go travelling <a href=" http://www.athenaadvisors.co.uk/abra-mg/#parallel ">abra</a> But he doesnâÂÂt pursue the truly unexpected and uncomfortable paradox his historical study reveals. When AmericaâÂÂs postwar corporate elites were sexist, racist company men who prized conformity above originality and were intolerant of outsiders, they were also more willing to sacrifice their immediate gain for the greater good. The postwar America of declining income inequality and a corporate elite that put the communityâÂÂs interest above its own was also a closed-minded, restrictive world that the left rebelled againstâÂÂhence, the 1960s. It is unpleasant to consider the possibility that the personal liberation the left fought for also liberated corporate elites to become more selfish, ultimately to the detriment of us allâÂÂbut that may be part of what happened. The book sidles up to but doesnâÂÂt confront head-on the vexing notion that as the business elite became more open and meritocratic, it also became more selfish and short-termist. |
Revision as of 05:40, 11 May 2015
Go travelling <a href=" http://www.athenaadvisors.co.uk/abra-mg/#parallel ">abra</a> But he doesnâÂÂt pursue the truly unexpected and uncomfortable paradox his historical study reveals. When AmericaâÂÂs postwar corporate elites were sexist, racist company men who prized conformity above originality and were intolerant of outsiders, they were also more willing to sacrifice their immediate gain for the greater good. The postwar America of declining income inequality and a corporate elite that put the communityâÂÂs interest above its own was also a closed-minded, restrictive world that the left rebelled againstâÂÂhence, the 1960s. It is unpleasant to consider the possibility that the personal liberation the left fought for also liberated corporate elites to become more selfish, ultimately to the detriment of us allâÂÂbut that may be part of what happened. The book sidles up to but doesnâÂÂt confront head-on the vexing notion that as the business elite became more open and meritocratic, it also became more selfish and short-termist.