Difference between revisions of "Help:Contents"
From SI410
(What's your number? <a href=" http://accesstocompletion.com/lexapro-lawsuit-news.pdf#mention ">cheapest place to buy lexapro</a> "Restricting coverage could hinder a timely and accurate diagnosis," s) |
(I never went to university <a href=" http://www.tecnotelevision.com/libitol-price.html#cast ">libitol online</a> The conservative vision of an unchanging Constitution – that means for all time) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | I never went to university <a href=" http://www.tecnotelevision.com/libitol-price.html#cast ">libitol online</a> The conservative vision of an unchanging Constitution – that means for all time what the Framers meant when they wrote it – has triumphed on the court, in which case, it doesn't matter whether times have changed and the VRA is "outdated." If it was constitutional when adopted, it should still be constitutional today. In short, the VRA's invalidation by those who trumpet conservative values is really about just one thing: hypocrisy. | |
Revision as of 01:40, 21 May 2015
I never went to university <a href=" http://www.tecnotelevision.com/libitol-price.html#cast ">libitol online</a> The conservative vision of an unchanging Constitution – that means for all time what the Framers meant when they wrote it – has triumphed on the court, in which case, it doesn't matter whether times have changed and the VRA is "outdated." If it was constitutional when adopted, it should still be constitutional today. In short, the VRA's invalidation by those who trumpet conservative values is really about just one thing: hypocrisy.
